Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr 30;47(2):639-650.
doi: 10.1042/BST20180445. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

Membrane trafficking in osteoclasts and implications for osteoporosis

Affiliations
Review

Membrane trafficking in osteoclasts and implications for osteoporosis

Pei Ying Ng et al. Biochem Soc Trans. .

Abstract

Osteoclasts are large multinucleated cells exquisitely adapted to resorb bone matrix. Like other eukaryotes, osteoclasts possess an elaborate ensemble of intracellular organelles through which solutes, proteins and other macromolecules are trafficked to their target destinations via membrane-bound intermediaries. During bone resorption, membrane trafficking must be tightly regulated to sustain the structural and functional polarity of the osteoclasts' membrane domains. Of these, the ruffled border (RB) is most characteristic, functioning as the osteoclasts' secretory apparatus. This highly convoluted organelle is classically considered to be formed by the targeted fusion of acidic vesicles with the bone-facing plasma membrane. Emerging findings disclose new evidence that the RB is far more complex than previously envisaged, possessing discrete subdomains that are serviced by several intersecting endocytic, secretory, transcytotic and autophagic pathways. Bone-resorbing osteoclasts therefore serve as a unique model system for studying polarized membrane trafficking. Recent advances in high-resolution microscopy together with the convergence of genetic and cell biological studies in humans and in mice have helped illuminate the major membrane trafficking pathways in osteoclasts and unmask the core molecular machinery that governs these distinct vesicle transport routes. Among these, small Rab GTPases, their binding partners and members of the endocytic sorting nexin family have emerged as critical regulators. This mini review summarizes our current understanding of membrane trafficking in osteoclasts, the key molecular participants, and discusses how these transport machinery may be exploited for the development of new therapies for metabolic disorders of bone-like osteoporosis.

Keywords: Rab GTPases; membrane trafficking; osteoclast; osteoporosis; secretory lysosomes; sorting nexins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Intracellular roadmap of polarized membrane trafficking in bone-resorbing osteoclasts.
(A) Transmission electron micrograph of a cross-section taken through a bone-resorbing osteoclast in situ from a 5-day-old mouse femur. (B) The osteoclast plasma membrane is segregated into four distinct subdomains: the functional secretory domain (FSD, blue), the basolateral domain (BD, green), the sealing zone (SZ, yellow) and the ruffled border (RB, red). Key intracellular organelles are highlighted. TV, transcytotic vesicle; SL, secretory lysosome; TGN, trans-Golgi network; RL, resorptive lacunae. Note that the pseudo-coloured organelles represent arbitrary author interpretations based on the size, morphology, position and intraluminal content of the compartments in the absence of intracellular markers. (C) The major vesicular transport routes in osteoclasts superimposed with key molecular participants. The ruffled border membrane is formed by the polarized trafficking and fusion of secretory lysosomes with the bone-apposed plasma membrane. The final fusion step is regulated by synaptotagmin 7 (SytVII) and expels cathepsin K (CTSK) and acid into the resorption lacunae for bone digestion. Secretory lysosome trafficking is regulated by Rab7 and its effector PLEKHM1 (Pleckstrin Homology And RUN Domain Containing M1), possibly in conjunction with other LRO-associated Rabs (RabX), i.e. Rab27A, Rab38 and Rab44 that may be recruited through GTP/GDP-dependent ‘Rab-transitions’. At the same time, LC3 (Microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3) is recruited to the ruffled border, possibly via the fusion of autophagosomes/phagosomes with secretory lysosomes, in a process analogous to LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP). The post-TGN-secretory vesicle trafficking route operated by Rab3D also services the ruffled border membrane but is distinct from lysosomes. During bone resorption degraded bone matrix including collagen-1a (Col-1a) is internalized at the ruffled border and transported apico-basolaterally to the FSD by transcytosis. The FSD serves as an exist site for degraded bone matrix and is distinguished from the basolateral domain via the post-Golgi trafficking of haemagglutinin (HA) and vesicular stomatitis virus G-protein (VSG-G), respectively, the latter potentially regulated by Rab13. The dashed boxed inset highlights the molecular anatomy of a secretory lysosome and its essential nanomachinery including SNX10 (Sorting nexin 10), the α3 subunit of the Vacuolar-type H+ ATPase (V-ATPase) proton pump, chloride ion channel 7 α subunit CLC-7 and its transmembrane coregulatory protein OSTM1 (osteopetrosis-associated transmembrane protein 1). N, nucleus.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Apicobasolateral transcytosis of degraded bone matrix from the ruffled border to the FSD in osteoclasts.
(A) Cartoon depicting a cross-section of a polarized bone-resorbing osteoclast to orientate the respective imaging planes. (B,C) Fluorescent confocal images of a bone-resorbing osteoclast derived from mouse bone marrow monocytes cultured in the presence of M-CSF and RANKL. Osteoclasts were cultured on devitalized bovine bone discs labelled with fluorescently conjugated bisphosphonates (cyan), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then stained with specific markers against cathepsin K (green), F-actin (Rhodamine-conjugated Phalloidin, red) and nuclei (Hoechst 33256, magenta). Images were obtained using a confocal microscope (Nikon A1) equipped with a 60× oil objective (NA = 1.4). Images represent serial confocal planes of individual pseudo-coloured fluorescent channels merged together. XY = top view (B), XZ = side view (C). Representative views of a bone-resorbing osteoclast are taken from the top (FSD), mid-point (nuclear level) and bottom (ruffled border/bone surface). Insets correspond to the magnification of boxed regions 1–3. Yellow dashed line in Inset 1 demarcates the FSD. White arrows denote degraded bone matrix delivered apciobasolaterally from the ruffled border to the FSD, presumably via transcytotic carrier vesicles. Solid white line indicates the orientation of XZ plane shown in (C). Asterisks correspond to the trailing resorptive pit. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martin T.J. and Sims N.A. (2005) Osteoclast-derived activity in the coupling of bone formation to resorption. Trends Mol. Med. 11, 76–81 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.12.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crockett J.C., Rogers M.J., Coxon F.P., Hocking L.J. and Helfrich M.H. (2011) Bone remodelling at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 124, 991–998 10.1242/jcs.063032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Novack D.V. and Teitelbaum S.L. (2008) The osteoclast: friend or foe? Annu. Rev. Pathol. 3, 457–484 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151431 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teitelbaum S.L. and Ross F.P. (2003) Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 638–649 10.1038/nrg1122 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Väänänen H.K., Zhao H., Mulari M. and Halleen J.M. (2000) The cell biology of osteoclast function. J. Cell Sci. 113, 377–381 PMID: - PubMed

Publication types

Substances