Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey
- PMID: 30782882
- PMCID: PMC6367953
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023506
Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence and associated factors for personal, work-related and patient/client-related burnout in clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in academic medicine.
Design: Prevalence survey using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory.
Setting: Mid-size academic health centre.
Participants: Clinical providers (n=6489) and biomedical scientists (n=248) were invited to complete the survey. 1646 completed responses (response rate 24.4%) were analysed.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Prevalence estimates and adjusted ORs (AOR) were stratified for gender, age and professional category.
Results: Type of burnout varies across professional categories, with significant differences between clinicians and scientists. The prevalence of personal burnout was 52.7% (95%CI 50% to 55%), work-related burnout 47.5% (95%CI 45% to 49%) and patient/client-related burnout 20.3% (95%CI 18% to 22%). The prevalence of personal and work-related burnout was higher among women, while those aged 20-30 had a higher prevalence of all three burnout categories. Overall, clinical professionals had higher personal and work-related burnout, while biomedical scientists had higher client-related burnout. Accounting for the effects of gender and age, a significantly higher risk for personal burnout was found for physicians (AOR 1.64; 95%CI 1.3 to 2.1) and nurses (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.03 to 2.2). Significantly higher odds of work-related burnout were found for nurses (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.2 to 1.9) and residents (AOR 1.9; 95%CI 1.04 to 3.6). Basic scientists (AOR 10.0; 95%CI 5.7 to 17.6), physicians (AOR 2.8; 95%CI 1.9 to 4.1) and nurses (AOR 2.1; 95%CI 1.3 to 3.5) had higher odds of patient/client-related burnout.
Conclusions: Types of burnout are unevenly distributed in academic medical centres. Physicians have higher risk of personal and patient/client-related burnout, residents have higher risk of work-related burnout, basic scientists are at higher risk of client-related burnout and nurses have higher odds of all three types of burnout. Interventions addressing the problem of burnout in clinical environments may be inadequate to support biomedical scientists.
Keywords: academic medicine; burnout; engagement; prevalence; professional wellbeing.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Burnout prevalence in New Zealand's public hospital senior medical workforce: a cross-sectional mixed methods study.BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 23;6(11):e013947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013947. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27881531 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships of work-related psychosocial risks, stress, individual factors and burnout - Questionnaire survey among emergency physicians and nurses.Med Pr. 2017 Mar 24;68(2):167-178. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00516. Epub 2017 Mar 13. Med Pr. 2017. PMID: 28345677 English.
-
Short sleep duration is dose-dependently related to job strain and burnout in nurses: a cross sectional survey.Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Oct 11. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015. PMID: 25311378
-
Factors that influence the development of compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction in emergency department nurses.J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Mar;47(2):186-94. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12122. Epub 2015 Jan 20. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015. PMID: 25644276 Review.
-
Burnout in Academic Medicine: A Peripandemic Assessment.Perm J. 2023 Jun 15;27(2):150-159. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.042. Epub 2023 Jun 14. Perm J. 2023. PMID: 37312568 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Nurses' burnout and quality of life: A systematic review and critical analysis of measures used.Nurs Open. 2022 May;9(3):1564-1574. doi: 10.1002/nop2.936. Epub 2021 May 15. Nurs Open. 2022. PMID: 33991408 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Job stressors in relation to burnout and compromised sleep among academic physicians in India.Work. 2024;78(2):505-525. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230383. Work. 2024. PMID: 38189728 Free PMC article.
-
Burnout of residents: Overview from various medical institutions - A suggested model for improvement.Urol Ann. 2020 Jan-Mar;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_107_19. Epub 2019 Nov 7. Urol Ann. 2020. PMID: 32015610 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Addressing Burnout and Enhancing Well-Being Among Academic Physicians: A Call for Future Research and Organizational Support.HCA Healthc J Med. 2024 Jun 1;5(3):199-208. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1742. eCollection 2024. HCA Healthc J Med. 2024. PMID: 39015590 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Moral Distress among Frontline Physicians and Nurses in the Early Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9682. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159682. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35955032 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Maslach C. Job Burnout: New Directions in Research and Intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003;12:189–92.
-
- Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, et al. . The copenhagen burnout inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress 2005;19:192–207. 10.1080/02678370500297720 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources