Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;49(1):9-15.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-1020-3.

Fat-Free Adipose Tissue Mass: Impact on Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) in Adolescents with and without Obesity

Takashi Abe  1 , Jeremy P Loenneke  2 , Robert S Thiebaud  3
Affiliations
Review

Fat-Free Adipose Tissue Mass: Impact on Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) in Adolescents with and without Obesity

Takashi Abe et al. Sports Med. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Fat-free body mass (FFM) is a surrogate for skeletal muscle mass and is often used for the normalization of several physiological variables (e.g., oxygen uptake). However, FFM includes non-skeletal muscle components such as the fat-free component of adipose tissue fat cells. As the amount of adipose tissue mass increases, the FFM will also increase and be included in the measurement of FFM. Therefore, FFM may not be an appropriate indicator of muscle mass when targeting individuals with a large amount of body fat. This review aimed (1) to examine the fat-free adipose tissue (FFAT) in adolescents with and without obesity and (2) to investigate the impact of FFAT on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) by comparing VO2peak expressed relative to FFM and FFM minus FFAT between adolescents with and without obesity. Calculated FFAT was threefold higher in adolescents with obesity compared to those without obesity (mean ± SD; 6.94 ± 1.40 vs. 2.22 ± 0.58 kg). The VO2peak expressed relative to FFM-FFAT was similar between the two groups (56.5 ± 6.7 vs. 57.4 ± 8.9 ml min-1 kg-1 FFM-FFAT, respectively). On the other hand, VO2peak expressed relative to FFM was approximately 8% different between groups. When normalizing VO2peak by FFM, eliminating the FFAT component from FFM may be needed, especially when comparing groups with different body fat mass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Obes Rev. 2014 Nov;15(11):894-904 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Oct;94(10):3687-95 - PubMed
    1. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014 Apr;54(2):186-96 - PubMed
    1. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005 Mar;45(1):13-9 - PubMed
    1. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2012 Oct 15;184(1):73-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources