The interaction between BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in determining survival outcomes after adjuvant 5FU based chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer
- PMID: 30399198
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.25275
The interaction between BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in determining survival outcomes after adjuvant 5FU based chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The predictive role of biomarkers in colon cancer is still being defined. The aim of this study is to determine the interaction between BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in determining survival benefit after adjuvant 5-FU based chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including all curatively resected stage III colon cancer cases over a 33-year period. A clinicopathological database was collated (adjuvant chemotherapy, age, gender, obstruction, perforation, tumor location, grade, mucin, nodal stage, extramural vascular, and perineural invasion). BRAF (V600E) mutation testing was performed and MSI status established by immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins and molecular testing for National Cancer Institute panel markers. Patients were categorized into four groups for comparison: MSS and BRAF-ve (termed " traditional"), MSI and BRAF-ve (termed " presumed Lynch"), MSI and BRAF+ve (termed " sporadic MSI"), and MSS and BRAF+ve (termed " other BRAF"). The primary endpoint was cancer specific survival. Interaction testing was conducted to determine whether there were different responses to chemotherapy between groups.
Results: A total of 686 unselected cases met inclusion criteria and had tissue available, of which 15.7% had BRAF mutation (BRAF+ve) and 13.8% had MSI. Thirty-nine percent received chemotherapy. Overall, adjuvant chemotherapy produced a cancer specific survival benefit (HR 0.66, 95% CI, 0.49-0.88, P < 0.01). On adjusted analysis, neither BRAF nor MSI status were individually predictive of survival benefit. On adjusted analysis specifically of the chemotherapy effect in each subgroup, only patients in the presumed Lynch (HR 0.260, 95% CI, 0.09-0.80, P < 0.01) and other BRAF groups (HR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.23-0.87, P < 0.01) had a significant survival benefit from chemotherapy. On interaction testing of subgroups, adjusting for all the clinicopathological parameters, only patients in the presumed Lynch group (HR 0.277, 95% CI, 0.10-0.75, P < 0.01) gained a differentially greater benefit from chemotherapy than other groups.
Conclusions: In this historical cohort, MSI testing is predictive of response to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer, but only when results are interpreted in combination with BRAF. This supports the role of routine testing for these biomarkers.
Keywords: BRAF; MSI; chemotherapy; colon cancer.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic significance of BRAF mutation alone and in combination with microsatellite instability in stage III colon cancer.Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;15(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13096. Epub 2018 Nov 13. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30421554
-
Prognostic Value of BRAF and KRAS Mutations in MSI and MSS Stage III Colon Cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Dec 31;109(5):djw272. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw272. Print 2017 May. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016. PMID: 28040692 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803.Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 1;18(3):890-900. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2246. Epub 2011 Dec 6. Clin Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 22147942 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Predictive and prognostic value of MSI phenotype in adjuvant colon cancer: Who and how to treat?].Bull Cancer. 2019 Feb;106(2):129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Dec 4. Bull Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30527814 Review. French.
-
Pathological complete response with anti-PD-1 therapy in a patient with microsatellite instable high, BRAF mutant metastatic colon cancer: a case report and review of literature.Discov Med. 2016 May;21(117):341-7. Discov Med. 2016. PMID: 27355330 Review.
Cited by
-
Sustainable Clinical Development of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Sep 9;6(1):37-45. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12503. eCollection 2022 Jan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021. PMID: 35106413 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Survival benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III microsatellite-high/deficient mismatch repair colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):1055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05065-6. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35058539 Free PMC article.
-
Controversies and management of deficient mismatch repair gastrointestinal cancers in the neoadjuvant setting.Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Mar 29;15:17588359231162577. doi: 10.1177/17588359231162577. eCollection 2023. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37007634 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Re-Evaluation of the Survival Paradox Between Stage IIB/IIC and Stage IIIA Colon Cancer.Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 18;10:595107. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.595107. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33312954 Free PMC article.
-
M2 macrophage-derived exosomal microRNA-155-5p promotes the immune escape of colon cancer by downregulating ZC3H12B.Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021 Feb 6;20:484-498. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2021.02.005. eCollection 2021 Mar 26. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021. PMID: 33718596 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous