Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov:106:54-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.08.027. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

Perspectives of psychiatric investigators and IRB chairs regarding benefits of psychiatric genetics research

Affiliations

Perspectives of psychiatric investigators and IRB chairs regarding benefits of psychiatric genetics research

Laura Weiss Roberts et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

There is hope that psychiatric genetics inquiry will provide important insights into the origins and treatment of mental illness given the burden of these conditions. We sought to examine perspectives of psychiatric genetic investigators regarding the potential benefits of genetic research in general and the potential benefits of genetic research for the diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses specifically. We compared investigator attitudes with those of chairs of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) entrusted with evaluating the benefits and risks of human research studies. Two groups directly engaged with the conduct and oversight of psychiatric genetic research were examined (psychiatric investigators, n = 203; IRB Chairs, n = 183). Participants rated 15 survey items regarding current and future benefits of general genetic research, possible benefits of psychiatric genetic research, and the importance to society of genetic vs. non-genetic research examining causes and treatments of illnesses. Investigators and IRB Chairs strongly endorsed the future benefits of general genetic research for society and for the health of individuals; compared to IRB Chairs, investigators were more positive about these benefits. Even after adjusting for demographic variables, psychiatric genetic investigators were significantly more optimistic about genetic research compared with IRB Chairs. Both groups were moderately optimistic about the possible benefits of genetic research related to mental illness. Greater optimism was seen regarding new or personalized medications for mental illnesses, as well as genetic predictive testing of mental illnesses. Greater precision and circumspection about the potential benefits of psychiatric genetic research are needed.

Keywords: Clinical research; Ethics; Genetics; IRBs; Psychiatric genetics; Psychiatric investigators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Perceived Optimism and Benefits of Genetic Research as Assessed by Psychiatric Investigators (n = 183) and IRB Chairs (n = 203) * Indicates significant between-group differences in Composite 1 (P = 0.00001) and Composite 3 (P = 0.01)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott PW, Gumusoglu SB, Bittle J, Beversdorf DQ, Stevens HE, 2018. Prenatal stress and genetic risk: How prenatal stress interacts with genetics to alter risk for psychiatric illness. Psychoneuroendocrinology 90, 9–21. - PubMed
    1. Alford SH, McBride CM, Reid RJ, Larson EB, Baxevanis AD, Brody LC, 2011. Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group. Public Health Genomics 14(2), 85–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armor DA, Sackett AM, 2006. Accuracy, error, and bias in predictions for real versus hypothetical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(4), 583–600. - PubMed
    1. Biesecker BB, Peay HL, 2003. Ethical issues in psychiatric genetics research: points to consider. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 171(1), 27–35. - PubMed
    1. Biesecker BB, Peay HL, 2013. Genomic sequencing for psychiatric disorders: promise and challenge. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 16(7), 1667–1672. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types