Imaging of Hepatic Fibrosis
- PMID: 30159792
- DOI: 10.1007/s11894-018-0652-7
Imaging of Hepatic Fibrosis
Abstract
Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to discuss the current imaging techniques for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis (LF).
Recent findings: Elastography-based techniques are the most widely used imaging methods for the evaluation of LF. Currently, MR elastography (MRE) is the most accurate non-invasive method for detection and staging of LF. Ultrasound-based vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is the most widely used as it can be easily performed at the point of care but has technical limitations especially in the obese. Innovations and technical improvements continue to evolve in elastography for improving accuracy and avoiding misinterpretation from confounding factors. Other imaging methods including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), hepatocellular contrast-enhanced (HCE) MRI, T1 relaxometry, T1ρ imaging, textural analysis, liver surface nodularity, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and perfusion imaging are promising but need further evaluation and clinical validation. MRE is the most accurate imaging technique for assessment of LF.
Keywords: Functional imaging; Liver fibrosis; Magnetic resonance elastography.
Similar articles
-
Liver fibrosis assessment: MR and US elastography.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Sep;47(9):3037-3050. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03269-4. Epub 2021 Oct 23. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022. PMID: 34687329 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Staging liver fibrosis on multiparametric MRI in a rabbit model with elastography, susceptibility-weighted imaging and T1ρ imaging: a preliminary study.Acta Radiol. 2021 Feb;62(2):155-163. doi: 10.1177/0284185120917117. Epub 2020 Apr 23. Acta Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32326722
-
Prospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to transient elastography and serum markers for liver fibrosis detection.Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):659-66. doi: 10.1111/liv.13058. Epub 2016 Feb 7. Liver Int. 2016. PMID: 26744140 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Elastography with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography for Pre-operative Staging of Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Dec;43(12):2783-2790. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.08.1879. Epub 2017 Sep 29. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017. PMID: 28965721
-
American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Elastography in Chronic Liver Diseases.Gastroenterology. 2017 May;152(6):1544-1577. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.016. Gastroenterology. 2017. PMID: 28442120 Review.
Cited by
-
Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: A Single-Institution Review of Cases Performed in a 5-Year Interval.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;46(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001228. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022. PMID: 34581704 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Stage Using Integrative Analysis of Hepatic Heterogeneity and Nodularity in Routine MRI with FIB-4 Index as Reference Standard.J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 15;10(8):1697. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081697. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33920804 Free PMC article.
-
The Advance of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Tumor Diagnosis.Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 31;11:722703. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.722703. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34532290 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison and optimization of b value combinations for diffusion-weighted imaging in discriminating hepatic fibrosis.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Apr;49(4):1113-1121. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04159-7. Epub 2024 Jan 29. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024. PMID: 38285179
-
Updates on Imaging of Liver Tumors.Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Apr 16;22(5):46. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00907-w. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020. PMID: 32296952 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials