Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;21(1):130-139.
doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1207-x.

Evaluating Ga-68 Peptide Conjugates for Targeting VPAC Receptors: Stability and Pharmacokinetics

Affiliations

Evaluating Ga-68 Peptide Conjugates for Targeting VPAC Receptors: Stability and Pharmacokinetics

Pardeep Kumar et al. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the use of gallium-68 labeled receptor-specific peptides for imaging oncologic diseases. The objective was to examine the stability and pharmacokinetics of [68Ga]NODAGA and DOTA-peptide conjugate targeting VPAC [combined for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP)] receptors on tumor cells.

Procedures: A VPAC receptor-specific peptide was chosen as a model peptide and conjugated to NODAGA and DOTA via solid-phase synthesis. The conjugates were characterized by HPLC and MALDI-TOF. Following Ga-68 chelation, the radiochemical purity of Ga-68 labeled peptide conjugate was determined by radio-HPLC. The stability was tested against transmetallation using 100 nM Fe3+/Zn2+/Ca2+ ionic solution and against transchelation using 200 μM DTPA solution. The ex vivo and in vivo stability of the Ga-68 labeled peptide conjugate was tested in mouse plasma and urine. Receptor specificity was determined ex vivo by cell binding assays using human breast cancer BT474 cells. Positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging, tissue distribution, and blocking studies were performed in mice bearing BT474 xenografts.

Results: The chemical and radiochemical purity was greater than 95 % and both conjugates were stable against transchelation and transmetallation. Ex vivo stability at 60 min showed that the NODAGA-peptide-bound Ga-68 reduced to 42.1 ± 3.7 % (in plasma) and 37.4 ± 2.9 % (in urine), whereas the DOTA-peptide-bound Ga-68 was reduced to 1.2 ± 0.3 % (in plasma) and 4.2 ± 0.4 % (in urine) at 60 min. Similarly, the in vivo stability for [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide was decreased to 2.1 ± 0.2 % (in plasma) and 2.2 ± 0.4 % (in urine). For [68Ga]DOTA-peptide, it was decreased to 1.4 ± 0.3 % (in plasma) and 1.2 ± 0.4 % (in urine) at 60 min. The specific BT474 cell binding was 53.9 ± 0.8 % for [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide, 25.8 ± 1.4 % for [68Ga]-DOTA-peptide, and 18.8 ± 2.5 % for [68Ga]GaCl3 at 60 min. Inveon microPET/CT imaging at 1 h post-injection showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher tumor to muscle (T/M) ratio for [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide (3.4 ± 0.3) as compared to [68Ga]DOTA-peptide (1.8 ± 0.6). For [68Ga]GaCl3 and blocked mice, their ratios were 1.5 ± 0.6 and 1.5 ± 0.3 respectively. The tissue distributions data were similar to the PET imaging data.

Conclusion: NODAGA is superior to DOTA in terms of radiolabeling kinetics. The method of radiolabeling was reproducible and yielded higher specific activity. Although both agents have relatively low in vivo stability, PET/CT imaging studies delineated BC tumors with [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide, but not with [68Ga]DOTA-peptide.

Keywords: Chelating agents; Gallium-68; Molecular imaging; Radiochemistry; Tumor imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Mathew L. Thakur is consultant to NuView and Zevacor, Inc. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
MALDI-TOF MS analysis of a NODAGA-peptide and b DOTA-peptide conjugates showing respective molecular weights (Da). The major peaks at 3787 Da for the NODAGA-peptide and 3717 Da for the DOTA-peptide are in concurrence with the calculated masses.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radio-HPLC showing peaks for Ga-68Cl3 at 3.1 min and [68Ga]NODAGA and DOTA-peptide conjugate at 10.2 ± 0.3 min.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
HPLC analysis of plasma showed decrease in the radiolabeling of a [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide and b [68Ga]DOTA-peptide conjugate upon incubation at 37 °C.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cell uptake of [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide, [68Ga]DOTA-peptide, and free Ga-68(III) at various time points.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
PET/CT images show biodistribution of a [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide, b [68Ga]DOTA-peptide, c blocked mouse, and d [68Ga]Cl3. The tumor to muscle (T/M) ratio for [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide was 3.4 ± 0.3, 1.8 ± 0.6 for [68Ga]DOTA-peptide, 1.6 ± 0.3 in receptor-blocked mice, and 1.5 ± 0.6 for [68Ga]Cl3. T/M ratios were significantly (p < 0.05) greater for NODAGA-peptide than for the DOTA-peptide. Arrow indicates the tumor.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Tissue distribution %ID/g of [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide, [68Ga]DOTA-peptide, [68Ga]GaCl3, and blocked mouse.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Nahhas A, Win Z, Szyszko T et al. (2007) Gallium-68 PET: a new frontier in receptor cancer imaging. Anticancer Res 27:4087–4094 - PubMed
    1. Banerjee SR, Pullambhatla M, Byun Y et al. (2010) [68Ga]-labeled inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for imaging prostate cancer. J Med Chem 53:5333–5341 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ambrosini V, Campana D, Tomassetti P et al. (2011) PET/CT with [68Ga]gallium-DOTA-peptides in NET: an overview. Eur J Radiol 80:116 - PubMed
    1. Baum RP, Kulkarni HR, Carreras C (2012) Peptides and receptors in image-guided therapy: theranostics for neuroendocrine neoplasms. Semin Nucl Med 42:190–207 - PubMed
    1. Weiner RE, Thakur ML (2005) Radiolabeled peptides in oncology: role in diagnosis and treatment. BioDrugs 19:145–163 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources