Fragile X checklists: A meta-analysis and development of a simplified universal clinical checklist
- PMID: 29624914
- PMCID: PMC6081230
- DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.398
Fragile X checklists: A meta-analysis and development of a simplified universal clinical checklist
Abstract
Background: Clinical checklists available have been developed to assess the risk of a positive Fragile X syndrome but they include relatively small sample sizes. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis that included statistical pooling of study results to obtain accurate figures on the prevalence of clinical predictors of Fragile X syndrome among patients with intellectual disability, thereby helping health professionals to improve their referrals for Fragile X testing.
Methods: All published studies consisting of cytogenetic and/or molecular screening for fragile X syndrome among patients with intellectual disability, were eligible for the meta-analysis. All patients enrolled in clinical checklists trials of Fragile X syndrome were eligible for this review, with no exclusion based on ethnicity or age. Odds ratio values, with 95% confidence intervals as well as Cronbach coefficient alpha, was reported to assess the frequency of clinical characteristics in subjects with intellectual disability with and without the fragile X mutation to determine the most discriminating.
Results: The following features were strongly associated with Fragile X syndrome: skin soft and velvety on the palms with redundancy of skin on the dorsum of hand [OR: 16.85 (95% CI 10.4-27.3; α:0.97)], large testes [OR: 7.14 (95% CI 5.53-9.22; α: 0.80)], large and prominent ears [OR: 18.62 (95% CI 14.38-24.1; α: 0.98)], pale blue eyes [OR: 8.97 (95% CI 4.75-16.97; α: 0.83)], family history of intellectual disability [OR: 3.43 (95% CI 2.76-4.27; α: 0.81)] as well as autistic-like behavior [OR: 3.08 (95% CI 2.48-3.83; α: 0.77)], Flat feet [OR: 11.53 (95% CI 6.79-19.56; α:0.91)], plantar crease [OR: 3.74 (95% CI 2.67-5.24; α: 0.70)]. We noted a weaker positive association between transverse palmar crease [OR: 2.68 (95% CI 1.70-4.18; α: 0.51)], elongated face [OR: 3.69 (95% CI 2.84-4.81; α: 0.63)]; hyperextensible metacarpo-phalangeal joints [OR: 2.68 (95% CI 2.15-3.34; α: 0.57)] and the Fragile X syndrome.
Conclusion: This study has identified the highest risk features for patients with Fragile X syndrome that have been used to design a universal clinical checklist.
Keywords: checklists; clinical features; fragile X; meta-analysis.
© 2018 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[A simplified six-item checklist for screening of fragile X syndrome].Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2000 Feb;22(1):85-7. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2000. PMID: 12903502 Chinese.
-
A simplified six-item checklist for screening for fragile X syndrome in the pediatric population.J Pediatr. 1996 Oct;129(4):611-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70130-0. J Pediatr. 1996. PMID: 8859272
-
A 15-item checklist for screening mentally retarded males for the fragile X syndrome.Clin Genet. 1991 May;39(5):347-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1991.tb03041.x. Clin Genet. 1991. PMID: 1860251 Free PMC article.
-
An assessment of screening strategies for fragile X syndrome in the UK.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(7):1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta5070. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11262423 Review.
-
Epidemiology of fragile X syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Jul;164A(7):1648-58. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36511. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Am J Med Genet A. 2014. PMID: 24700618 Review.
Cited by
-
FMR1 gene CGG repeat distribution among the three individual cohorts with intellectual disability, autism, and primary ovarian insufficiency from Tamil Nadu, Southern India.Adv Genet (Hoboken). 2021 May 28;2(2):e10048. doi: 10.1002/ggn2.10048. eCollection 2021 Jun. Adv Genet (Hoboken). 2021. PMID: 36618123 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Individuals with Non-Syndromic Global Developmental Delay and Intellectual Disability.Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;10(3):414. doi: 10.3390/children10030414. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36979972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-derived iPSC modeling of rare neurodevelopmental disorders: Molecular pathophysiology and prospective therapies.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Feb;121:201-219. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.025. Epub 2020 Dec 25. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021. PMID: 33370574 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genetic Testing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 19;9:526779. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.526779. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 33681094 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Fragile X Syndrome and Fragile X Premutation Associated Conditions in Africa.Genes (Basel). 2024 May 25;15(6):683. doi: 10.3390/genes15060683. Genes (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38927619 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Arvio, M. , Peippo, M. , & Simola, K. O. (1997). Applicability of a checklist for clinical screening of the fragile X syndrome. Clinical genetics, 52(4), 211–215. - PubMed
-
- Behery, A. K. (2008). Fragile x‐syndrome: Clinical and molecular studies. The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 83(3–4), 273–283. - PubMed
-
- Bellavance, J. , & Morin, D. (2017). French translation and validation of a fragile X syndrome screening checklist. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 6, 1–6. 10.3109/13668250.2017.1310807 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources