Current Approaches to Bone Tissue Engineering: The Interface between Biology and Engineering
- PMID: 29280321
- DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201701061
Current Approaches to Bone Tissue Engineering: The Interface between Biology and Engineering
Abstract
The successful regeneration of bone tissue to replace areas of bone loss in large defects or at load-bearing sites remains a significant clinical challenge. Over the past few decades, major progress is achieved in the field of bone tissue engineering to provide alternative therapies, particularly through approaches that are at the interface of biology and engineering. To satisfy the diverse regenerative requirements of bone tissue, the field moves toward highly integrated approaches incorporating the knowledge and techniques from multiple disciplines, and typically involves the use of biomaterials as an essential element for supporting or inducing bone regeneration. This review summarizes the types of approaches currently used in bone tissue engineering, beginning with those primarily based on biology or engineering, and moving into integrated approaches in the areas of biomaterial developments, biomimetic design, and scalable methods for treating large or load-bearing bone defects, while highlighting potential areas for collaboration and providing an outlook on future developments.
Keywords: biomaterials; bone regeneration; scaffolds; tissue engineering.
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Similar articles
-
Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering.Acta Biomater. 2018 Oct 15;80:1-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.031. Epub 2018 Sep 22. Acta Biomater. 2018. PMID: 30248515 Review.
-
Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: A review of in vivo studies in bone defect models.Acta Biomater. 2017 Oct 15;62:1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030. Epub 2017 Aug 24. Acta Biomater. 2017. PMID: 28844964 Review.
-
Silk scaffolds in bone tissue engineering: An overview.Acta Biomater. 2017 Nov;63:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Sep 20. Acta Biomater. 2017. PMID: 28941652 Review.
-
Biomimetic Materials and Fabrication Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering.Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 Dec;6(23). doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700612. Epub 2017 Nov 24. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017. PMID: 29171714 Review.
-
Biomimetic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1064:109-121. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0445-3_7. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018. PMID: 30471029 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Calcium Carbonate Microcapsules and Nanohydroxyapatite on Properties of Thermosensitive Chitosan/Collagen Hydrogels.Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;15(2):416. doi: 10.3390/polym15020416. Polymers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36679297 Free PMC article.
-
Structure-optimized and microenvironment-inspired nanocomposite biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Burns Trauma. 2024 Jun 9;12:tkae036. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae036. eCollection 2024. Burns Trauma. 2024. PMID: 38855573 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Research progress and clinical translation of three-dimensional printed porous tantalum in orthopaedics.Biomater Transl. 2023 Sep 28;4(3):166-179. doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2023.03.005. eCollection 2023. Biomater Transl. 2023. PMID: 38283089 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Osteogenic and anti-inflammatory effect of the multifunctional bionic hydrogel scaffold loaded with aspirin and nano-hydroxyapatite.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jan 24;11:1105248. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1105248. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 36761294 Free PMC article.
-
[Research progress of porous tantalum in bone tissue engineering].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 15;32(6):753-757. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201711040. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29905056 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous