Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 1;4(2):190-195.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4211.

Estimating Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Ovarian Cancer Screening Program in the United States: Secondary Analysis of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)

Affiliations

Estimating Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Ovarian Cancer Screening Program in the United States: Secondary Analysis of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)

Haley A Moss et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) is the largest randomized clinical trial to evaluate screening's impact on ovarian cancer mortality, assigning women to multimodal screening (MMS) with serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) interpreted using a risk algorithm. If the MMS screening method is eventually shown to reduce mortality and be cost-effective, then it may be accepted by the medical community as a feasible screening tool.

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of an MMS screening program in the United States.

Design, setting, and participants: A Markov simulation model was constructed using data from UKCTOCS to compare MMS with no screening in the United States. Screening would begin at the age of 50 years for women in the general population. Published estimates of the long-term effect of MMS screening on ovarian cancer mortality and the trial's published hazard ratios were used to simulate mortality estimates up to 40 years from start of screening. Base-case costs included CA-125, ultrasound, and false-positive work-up results, in addition to a risk algorithm cost estimate of $100. The utility and costs of ovarian cancer treatment were incorporated into the model.

Interventions: Screening strategies varied by costs of the algorithm and treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, rates of screening compliance, ovarian cancer incidence, and extrapolation of ovarian cancer mortality.

Main outcomes and measures: Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and mortality reduction of ovarian cancer screening.

Results: Multimodal screening is both more expensive and more effective in reducing ovarian cancer mortality over a lifetime than no screening. After accounting for uncertainty in the underlying parameters, screening women starting at age 50 years with MMS is cost-effective 70% of the time, when decision makers are willing to pay $150 000 per QALY. Screening reduced mortality by 15%, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) ranging from $106 187 (95% CI, $97 496-$127 793) to $155 256 (95% CI, $150 369-$198 567).

Conclusions and relevance: Ovarian cancer screening is potentially cost-effective in the United States depending on final significance of mortality reduction and cost of the CA-125 risk algorithm. These results are limited by uncertainty around the effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality beyond the 11 years of UKCTOCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Havrilesky receives grant funding from Astra Zeneca and her spouse is an employee of Bioventus. No other disclosures are reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Decision Tree With Markov States
Triangles indicate terminal nodes; blue circles, chance nodes; and orange circles, Marhov nodes.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. One-Way Sensitivity Analysis Adjusting the Cost of Screening Algorithm
QALY indicates quality-adjusted life-years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing the base-case scenario with the 2 alternative scenarios (1% maximum ovarian cancer mortality; extrapolated screening mortality). Willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold: $100 000/QALY (blue solid line); $150 000 (blue dashed line).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Are W. The Key Statistics About Ovarian Cancer? Cancer A-Z 2017; https://www.cancer.org/cancer/ovarian-cancer/about/key-statistics.html. Accessed April 5, 2017.
    1. Cress RD, Chen YS, Morris CR, Petersen M, Leiserowitz GS. Characteristics of long-term survivors of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):491-497. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurman RJ, Visvanathan K, Roden R, Wu TC, Shih IeM. Early detection and treatment of ovarian cancer: shifting from early stage to minimal volume of disease based on a new model of carcinogenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):351-356. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Nagell JR Jr, DePriest PD, Ueland FR, et al. . Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened. Cancer. 2007;109(9):1887-1896. - PubMed
    1. Jacobs IJ, Skates SJ, MacDonald N, et al. . Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9160):1207-1210. - PubMed

MeSH terms