Training health professionals to recruit into challenging randomized controlled trials improved confidence: the development of the QuinteT randomized controlled trial recruitment training intervention
- PMID: 29191445
- PMCID: PMC5844671
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.015
Training health professionals to recruit into challenging randomized controlled trials improved confidence: the development of the QuinteT randomized controlled trial recruitment training intervention
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe and evaluate a training intervention for recruiting patients to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), particularly for those anticipated to be difficult for recruitment.
Study design and setting: One of three training workshops was offered to surgeons and one to research nurses. Self-confidence in recruitment was measured through questionnaires before and up to 3 months after training; perceived impact of training on practice was assessed after. Data were analyzed using two-sample t-tests and supplemented with findings from the content analysis of free-text comments.
Results: Sixty-seven surgeons and 32 nurses attended. Self-confidence scores for all 10 questions increased after training [range of mean scores before 5.1-6.9 and after 6.9-8.2 (scale 0-10, all 95% confidence intervals are above 0 and all P-values <0.05)]. Awareness of hidden challenges of recruitment following training was high-surgeons' mean score 8.8 [standard deviation (SD), 1.2] and nurses' 8.4 (SD, 1.3) (scale 0-10); 50% (19/38) of surgeons and 40% (10/25) of nurses reported on a 4-point Likert scale that training had made "a lot" of difference to their RCT discussions. Analysis of free text revealed this was mostly in relation to how to convey equipoise, explain randomization, and manage treatment preferences.
Conclusion: Surgeons and research nurses reported increased self-confidence in discussing RCTs with patients, a raised awareness of hidden challenges and a positive impact on recruitment practice following QuinteT RCT Recruitment Training. Training will be made more available and evaluated in relation to recruitment rates and informed consent.
Keywords: Equipoise; Patient treatment preference; Professional education; Randomized controlled trial; Recruitment to randomized controlled trials; Training health professionals.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials.Trials. 2015 Sep 28;16:432. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26416143 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials.Trials. 2014 Jan 6;15:5. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-5. Trials. 2014. PMID: 24393291 Free PMC article.
-
Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians' Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials.PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002147. eCollection 2016 Oct. PLoS Med. 2016. PMID: 27755555 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches.Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):789-798. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 Jun 1. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28578829 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Trials. 2022 Oct 20;23(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06818-4. Trials. 2022. PMID: 36266700 Free PMC article.
-
A National Study of Oncology Nurses Discussing Cancer Clinical Trials With Patients.West J Nurs Res. 2019 Dec;41(12):1747-1760. doi: 10.1177/0193945919829145. Epub 2019 Feb 19. West J Nurs Res. 2019. PMID: 30782111 Free PMC article.
-
Pulmonary Metastasectomy versus Continued Active Monitoring in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC): a multicentre randomised clinical trial.Trials. 2019 Dec 12;20(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3837-y. Trials. 2019. PMID: 31831062 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Multi-professional perceptions of clinical research delivery and the Clinical Research Nurse role: a realist review.J Res Nurs. 2022 Mar;27(1-2):9-29. doi: 10.1177/17449871211068017. Epub 2022 Apr 1. J Res Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35392190 Free PMC article.
-
Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: further development and evaluation of the participatory and informed consent (PIC) measure.Trials. 2023 May 2;24(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07296-y. Trials. 2023. PMID: 37131255 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Treweek S., Mitchell E., Pitkethly M., Cook J., Kjeldstrøm M., Johansen M. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:MR000013. - PubMed
-
- Rosenthal R., Kasenda B., Dell-Kuster S., von Elm E., You J., Blumle A. Completion and publication rates of randomized controlled trials in surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;262:68–73. - PubMed
-
- Ross S., Grant A., Counsell C., Gillespie W., Russell I., Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:1143–1156. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources