Factors affecting eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients with visual field defect
- PMID: 29023521
- PMCID: PMC5638255
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185874
Factors affecting eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients with visual field defect
Abstract
Background: To investigate the success rate of eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients with visual field defect as well as non-glaucoma volunteers. Factors that may affect the success rate of eye drop instillation were also evaluated.
Design: A prospective, observational study.
Participants: Seventy-eight glaucoma patients and 85 non-glaucoma volunteers were recruited in this study.
Methods: Open angle glaucoma patients with visual field defect as well as non-glaucoma volunteers were asked to video record their procedures of eye drop instillation using a 5-mL plastic bottle of artificial tear solution. Success of eye drop instillation was judged on video based on the first one drop of solution successfully applied on the cornea, by two investigators.
Main outcome measures: Success rate of eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients and non-glaucoma volunteers. Factors related to success rate of eye drop instillation, such as visual field defect and clinical characteristics, were also analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: No significant deference in mean age was observed between two groups (glaucoma: 64.5 ± 14.4 years, non-glaucoma: 60.9 ± 14.1 years, P = 0.1156). Success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly lower (P = 0.0215) in glaucoma patients (30/78; 38.5%) than in non-glaucoma volunteers (48/85; 56.5%). The most frequent reason of instillation failure in glaucoma patients was touching the bulbar conjunctiva, cornea, eyelid or eyelashes with the tip of the bottle (29.5%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified lower corrected visual acuity (VA) (≤ 1.0; odds ratio [OR] = 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.93, P = 0.0411), lower mean deviation (MD) (< -12 dB; OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.86, P = 0.0307) and visual field defect (VFD) in the inferior hemifield (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.34, P < 0.001) to be significantly related to instillation failure in glaucoma patients.
Conclusions: Success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly lower in glaucoma patients than in non-glaucoma volunteers. Corrected VA ≤ 1.0, MD < -12 dB and/or VFD in the inferior hemifield may be related to failure of eye drop instillation.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Comparison of success rates in eye drop instillation between sitting position and supine position.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0204363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204363. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30235323 Free PMC article.
-
A video study of drop instillation in both glaucoma and retina patients with visual impairment.Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;152(6):982-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Aug 6. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 21821228
-
Evaluating eye drop instillation technique in glaucoma patients.J Glaucoma. 2012 Mar;21(3):189-92. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820bd2e1. J Glaucoma. 2012. PMID: 21336146
-
Drop instillation and glaucoma.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;29(2):171-177. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000451. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29140818 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Aids for eye drop administration.Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 May-Jun;62(3):332-345. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 21. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28011246 Review.
Cited by
-
Estimation of Topical Glaucoma Medication Over-Prescription and Its Associated Factors.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):184. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010184. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202191 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life in glaucoma.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;261(10):3023-3030. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06050-z. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37017741 Review.
-
Comparison of success rates in eye drop instillation between sitting position and supine position.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0204363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204363. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30235323 Free PMC article.
-
Co-Delivery of Timolol and Brimonidine with a Polymer Thin-Film Intraocular Device.J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar;35(2):124-131. doi: 10.1089/jop.2018.0096. Epub 2019 Jan 7. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2019. PMID: 30615539 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251699. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33989342 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Takahashi M, Naito T, Ootuki H, Mizoue S, Yoshikawa K: Influence of Eyedrop Bottle Shape on Handling. Journal of the eye (Atarashii Ganka). 2010; 27: 1107–11. [in Japanese]
-
- Nordstrom BL, Friedman DS, Mozaffari E, Quigley HA, Walker AM. Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140(4): 598–606. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.051 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hennessy AL, Katz J, Covert D, Protzko C, Robin AL. Videotaped evaluation of eyedrop instillation in glaucoma patients with visual impairment or moderate to severe visual field loss. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(12): 2345–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.040 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hennessy AL, Katz J, Covert D, Kelly CA, Suan EP, Speicher MA, et al. A video study of drop instillation in both glaucoma and retina patients with visual impairment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 152(6): 982–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.015 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous