Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec 1;28(12):2943-2949.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx501.

Incorporating BEAMing technology as a liquid biopsy into clinical practice for the management of colorectal cancer patients: an expert taskforce review

Affiliations
Review

Incorporating BEAMing technology as a liquid biopsy into clinical practice for the management of colorectal cancer patients: an expert taskforce review

J García-Foncillas et al. Ann Oncol. .

Abstract

The importance of mutation identification for advanced colorectal cancer treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents is well established. However, due to delays in turnaround time, low-quality tissue samples, and/or lack of standardization of testing methods a significant proportion of patients are being treated without the information that Kirsten rat sarcoma and neuroblastoma rat sarcoma (RAS) testing can provide. The detection of mutated circulating tumor DNA by BEAMing technology addresses this gap in care and allows these patients to receive international guideline-recommended expanded RAS testing with rapid turnaround times. Furthermore, the overall concordance between OncoBEAM RAS colorectal cancer testing and standard of care tissue testing is very high (93.3%). This article presents an overview of the clinical utility and potential applications of this minimally invasive method, such as early detection of emergent resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. If appropriately implemented, BEAMing technology holds considerable promise to enhance the quality of patient care and improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords: EGFR; colorectal cancer; liquid biopsy; mutation testing; tumor resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A.. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67: 7–30. - PubMed
    1. Ait Ouakrim D, Pizot C, Boniol M. et al. Trends in colorectal cancer mortality in Europe: retrospective analysis of the WHO mortality database. BMJ 2015; 351: h4970.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qiu LX, Mao C, Zhang J. et al. Predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a meta-analysis of 22 studies. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2781–2787. - PubMed
    1. Douillard J-Y, Oliner KS, Siena S. et al. Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1023–1034. - PubMed
    1. Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T. et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 1065–1075. - PubMed

MeSH terms