Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan-Dec;10(sup1):1291169.
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1291169.

Producing HIV estimates: from global advocacy to country planning and impact measurement

Affiliations
Review

Producing HIV estimates: from global advocacy to country planning and impact measurement

Mary Mahy et al. Glob Health Action. 2017 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Background: The development of global HIV estimates has been critical for understanding, advocating for and funding the HIV response. The process of generating HIV estimates has been cited as the gold standard for public health estimates.

Objective: This paper provides important lessons from an international scientific collaboration and provides a useful model for those producing public health estimates in other fields.

Design: Through the compilation and review of published journal articles, United Nations reports, other documents and personal experience we compiled historical information about the estimates and identified potential lessons for other public health estimation efforts.

Results: Through the development of core partnerships with country teams, implementers, demographers, mathematicians, epidemiologists and international organizations, UNAIDS has led a process to develop the capacity of country teams to produce internationally comparable HIV estimates. The guidance provided by these experts has led to refinements in the estimated numbers of people living with HIV, new HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths over the past 20 years. A number of important updates to the methods since 1997 resulted in fluctuations in the estimated levels, trends and impact of HIV. The largest correction occurred between the 2005 and 2007 rounds with the additions of household survey data into the models. In 2001 the UNAIDS models at that time estimated there were 40 million people living with HIV. In 2016, improved models estimate there were 30 million (27.6-32.7 million) people living with HIV in 2001.

Conclusions: Country ownership of the estimation tools has allowed for additional uses of the results than had the results been produced by researchers or a team in Geneva. Guidance from a reference group and input from country teams have led to critical improvements in the models over time. Those changes have improved countries' and stakeholders' understanding of the HIV epidemic.

Keywords: Bringing the indicators home: Country perspective on the utility of global estimates for health indicators (WHO); Estimation; HIV; models; strategic information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Past and current estimates of the global numbers of people living with HIV, new HIV infections, and AIDS-related deaths and major factors contributing to the changes in past estimates, 1997–2015.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garnett GP, Cousens S, Hallett TB, et al. Mathematical models in the evaluation of health programmes. Lancet. 2011. August 6;378:515–70. - PubMed
    1. Winslow CE. The untilled fields of public health. Science. 1920. January 9;51:23–33. - PubMed
    1. Hallett TB, White PJ, Garnett GP.. Appropriate evaluation of HIV prevention interventions: from experiment to full-scale implementation. Sex Transm Infect. 2007. August;83:i55–i60. - PubMed
    1. Diaz T, Garcia-Calleja JM, Ghys PD, et al. Advances and future directions in HIV surveillance in low- and middle-income countries. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009. July;4:253–259. - PubMed
    1. UNAIDS Focus on population and location. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2015.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources