Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;10(2):153-159.
doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9397-4.

Lumbar disc replacement surgery-successes and obstacles to widespread adoption

Stephan N Salzmann  1 , Nicolas Plais  1 , Jennifer Shue  1 , Federico P Girardi  2
Affiliations
Review

Lumbar disc replacement surgery-successes and obstacles to widespread adoption

Stephan N Salzmann et al. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Lumbar disc replacement has been a surgical alternative to fusion surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) for many years. Despite enthusiasm after the approval of the first devices, implantation rates have remained low, especially in the USA. The goal of this review is to provide a general overview of lumbar disc replacement in order to comprehend the successes and obstacles to widespread adoption.

Recent findings: Although a large amount of evidence-based data including satisfactory long-term results is available, implantation rates in the USA have not increased in the last decade. Possible explanations for this include strict indications for use, challenging surgical techniques, lack of device selection, fear of late complications or revision surgeries, and reimbursement issues. Recent publications can address some of the past concerns, but there still remain obstacles to widespread adoption. Upcoming data on long-term outcome, implant durability and possible very late complications will determine the future of lumbar disc replacement surgery.

Keywords: Degenerative disc disease; Fusion; Lumbar spine; Total disc replacement; Widespread adoption.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

Stephan N. Salzmann, Nicolas Plais and Jennifer Shue declare that they have no conflict of interest. Federico P. Girardi reports grants from MiMedx, personal fees from Paradigm Spine, LLC, personal fees from HealthPoint Capital, LP, personal fees from Spineart USA, personal fees and other from Centinel Spine, grants from Spinal Kinetics, personal fees from Scient'x USA, personal fees from Pharmawrite, LLC, personal fees from DePuy Spine, personal fees from OrthoDevelopment Corp, personal fees from Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc., personal fees from Lanx, Inc., grants from Aesculap Implant Systems, other from Paradigm Spine, other from LifeSpine, other from Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc., and other from Small Bone Innovations, outside the submitted work.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2028–2037. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz J. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Jt Surg. 2006;88:21–24. - PubMed
    1. Garcia R, Yue JJ, Blumenthal S, et al. Lumbar total disc replacement for discogenic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:1873–1881. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001245. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee YC, Zotti MGT, Osti OL. operative management of lumbar degenerative disc disease. Asian Spine J. 2016;10:801–819. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.801. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2119–2126. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a56a. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources