Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 27;9(2):13.
doi: 10.3390/cancers9020013.

Immune Modulation by Androgen Deprivation and Radiation Therapy: Implications for Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Immune Modulation by Androgen Deprivation and Radiation Therapy: Implications for Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy

Jennifer L Kalina et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Prostate cancer patients often receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with radiation therapy (RT). Recent evidence suggests that both ADT and RT have immune modulatory properties. First, ADT can cause infiltration of lymphocytes into the prostate, although it remains unclear whether the influx of lymphocytes is beneficial, particularly with the advent of new classes of androgen blockers. Second, in rare cases, radiation can elicit immune responses that mediate regression of metastatic lesions lying outside the field of radiation, a phenomenon known as the abscopal response. In light of these findings, there is emerging interest in exploiting any potential synergy between ADT, RT, and immunotherapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the rationale behind combining immunotherapy with ADT and RT for the treatment of prostate cancer, including an examination of the current clinical trials that employ this combination. The reported outcomes of several trials demonstrate the promise of this combination strategy; however, further scrutiny is needed to elucidate how these standard therapies interact with immune modulators. In addition, we discuss the importance of synchronizing immune modulation relative to ADT and RT, and provide insight into elements that may impact the ability to achieve maximum synergy between these treatments.

Keywords: androgen deprivation therapy; cancer vaccines; checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy; prostate cancer; radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cellular and molecular effects of ADT and RT as they relate to the development of anti-tumor immunity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huggins C. Effect of Orchiectomy and Irradiation on Cancer of the Prostate. Ann. Surg. 1942;115:1192–1200. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194206000-00030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolla M., Van Tienhoven G., Warde P., Dubois J.B., Mirimanoff R.O., Storme G., Bernier J., Kuten A., Sternberg C., Billiet I., et al. External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-Year results of an EORTC randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:1066–1073. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70223-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B., Schultz D., Blank K., Broderick G.A., Tomaszewski J.E., Renshaw A.A., Kaplan I., Beard C.J., et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969–974. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.969. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B., Schultz D., Renshaw A.A., Tomaszewski J.E., Richie J.P., Wein A. Optimizing patient selection for dose escalation techniques using the prostate-specific antigen level, biopsy gleason score, and clinical T-stage. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1999;45:1227–1233. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00303-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hernandez D.J., Nielsen M.E., Han M., Partin A.W. Contemporary evaluation of the D’amico risk classification of prostate cancer. Urology. 2007;70:931–935. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.055. - DOI - PubMed