Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 14;37(12):1022-1026.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.12.002.

[Efficacy and safety of Sorafenib as monotherapy to FLT3-ITD positive acute myeloid leukemia]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations

[Efficacy and safety of Sorafenib as monotherapy to FLT3-ITD positive acute myeloid leukemia]

[Article in Chinese]
J S Jia et al. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of Sorafenib as monotherapy to FLT3 positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: From April 2014 to December 2015, fourteen AML patients with FLT3 positive, 7 males and 7 females with a median age of 42 (range: 14-81) years old, were enrolled in this study. Of the 14 cases, 4 were de novo cases, 9 refractory cases and 1 relapsed case, including 78.6% patients with severe complications and 57.1% patients with KPS score less than 60 [the median KPS score was 45 (20-70) ]. The administration of Sorafenib was 400 mg twice daily and Sorafenib was continued if tolerated. The treatment response was evaluated by MICM and the data were analyzed by paired samples t test before and after Sorafenib treatment. Results: The peripheral blood WBC count [4.2 (0.9-11.8) ×109/L vs 39.6 (2.3-209.5) ×109/L, P<0.001 ], the percentage of peripheral blast cell [0.07 (0-0.54) vs 0.53 (0-0.94), P<0.001] and the percentage of bone marrow blast cell [0.266 (0.020-0.880) vs 0.604 (0.180-0.900), P=0.003] were significantly decreased after Sorafenib monotherapy compared with before. The overall response rate was 57.1% (8/14), including 5 cases (35.7%) with complete remission (CR). Of 4 de novo cases, 2 achieved CR, 1 with PR, 1 with NR; 3 of 10 refractory and relapsed patients achieved CR and 2 cases achieved PR, 5 cases NR. The median duration of achieving molecular remission (FLT3-ITD negative) after Sorafenib was 46(33-72) days, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 53 (28-175) days. Conclusion: Sorafenib shows activity in FLT3-ITD mutation positive AML patients. Sorafenib monotherapy could be used as a treatment option for elderly patients or patients with severe complications, and refractory and relapsed patients with not suitable for intensive chemotherapy.

目的: 探讨索拉非尼单药治疗FLT3-ITD突变阳性急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的有效性与安全性。

方法: 选取2014年4月至2015年12月使用索拉非尼单药治疗的FLT3-ITD突变阳性AML患者14例,其中男7例,女7例,中位年龄42(14~81)岁。4例为初治患者,9例为难治性患者,1例为复发患者。其中78.6%(11/14)的患者存在严重合并症;57.1%(8/14)的患者KPS评分<60分,中位评分45(20~70)分。索拉非尼起始用量为400 mg每日2次,如患者耐受持续使用。通过MICM检查对患者的治疗效果进行评价,通过配对t检验对索拉非尼治疗前后的临床指标进行分析。

结果: 索拉非尼单药治疗后与治疗前相比较,外周血WBC [4.2(0.9~11.8)×109/L对39.6(2.3~209.5)×109/L,P<0.001]、幼稚细胞比例[0.07(0~0.54)对0.53(0~0.94),P<0.001]以及骨髓幼稚细胞比例[0.266(0.020~0.880)对0.604(0.180~0.900),P=0.003]均明显下降。治疗总反应率为57.1%(8/14),5例(35.7%)达到完全缓解(CR);4例初治患者中2例达到CR, 1例达到部分缓解(PR),1例未缓解(NR);10例难治复发患者中3例达到CR, 2例达到PR,5例NR。有效患者达分子生物学缓解(FLT3-ITD转阴)的中位时间为46(33~72)d,中位无进展生存时间为53(28~175)d。治疗相关不良反应可耐受。

结论: 索拉非尼对FLT3-ITD突变阳性AML患者具有一定疗效。索拉非尼单药治疗方案可作为老年或伴有严重合并症、暂时不适宜行强化疗和难治复发FLT3-ITD突变阳性AML患者的一个治疗选择。

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haferlach T, Bacher U, Alpermann T, et al. Amount of bone marrow blasts is strongly correlated to NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutation rate in AML with normal karyotype[J] Leuk Res. 2012;36(1):51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.04.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Döhner K, Schlenk RF, Habdank M, et al. Mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1) predicts favorable prognosis in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: interaction with other gene mutations[J] Blood. 2005;106(12):3740–3746. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2164. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borthakur G, Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, et al. Phase I study of sorafenib in patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemias[J] Haematologica. 2011;96(1):62–68. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.030452. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ravandi F, Cortes JE, Jones D, et al. Phase I/II study of combination therapy with sorafenib, idarubicin, and cytarabine in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J] J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1856–1862. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4888. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. 刘 莎, 魏 旭东, 尹 青松, et al. 索拉非尼联合化疗治疗FLT3-ITD突变阳性急性髓系白血病九例报告并文献复习[J] 中华血液学杂志. 2015;36(3):241–244. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.03.016. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

基金项目:首都市民健康项目培育(Z131100006813026)