Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 4:2:41.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0085-8. eCollection 2016.

The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction

Shelley Potter  1 , Elizabeth J Conroy  2 , Paula R Williamson  2 , Steven Thrush  3 , Lisa J Whisker  4 , Joanna M Skillman  5 , Nicola L P Barnes  6 , Ramsey I Cutress  7 , Elizabeth M Teasdale  8 , Nicola Mills  1 , Senthurun Mylvaganam  9 , Olivier A Branford  10 , Katherina McEvoy  11 , Abhilash Jain  12 , Matthew D Gardiner  12 , Jane M Blazeby  1 , Christopher Holcombe  8 ; Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative
Affiliations

The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction

Shelley Potter et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK. The introduction of techniques to augment the subpectoral pocket has revolutionised the procedure, but there is a lack of high-quality outcome data to describe the safety or effectiveness of these techniques. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the best way of comparing treatments, but surgical RCTs are challenging. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study aims to determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic RCT to examine the effectiveness of approaches to IBBR.

Methods/design: The iBRA study is a trainee-led research collaborative project with four phases:Phase 1 - a national practice questionnaire (NPQ) to survey current practicePhase 2 - a multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients undergoing IBBR to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomesPhase 3- an IBBR-RCT acceptability survey and qualitative work to explore patients' and surgeons' views of proposed trial designs and candidate outcomes.Phase 4 - phases 1 to 3 will inform the design and conduct of the future RCT All centres offering IBBR will be encouraged to participate by the breast and plastic surgical professional associations (Association of Breast Surgery and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons). Data collected will inform the feasibility of undertaking an RCT by defining current practice and exploring issues surrounding recruitment, selection of comparator arms, choice of primary outcome, sample size, selection criteria, trial conduct, methods of data collection and feasibility of using the trainee collaborative model to recruit patients and collect data.

Discussion: The preliminary work undertaken within the iBRA study will determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a definitive RCT in IBBR. It will work with the trainee collaborative to build capacity by creating an infrastructure of research-active breast and plastic surgeons which will facilitate future high-quality research that will ultimately improve outcomes for all women seeking reconstructive surgery.

Trial registration: ISRCTN37664281.

Keywords: ADM; Breast reconstruction; Dermal sling; Feasibility study; Implant; Methodology; Randomised clinical trial; Trainee collaboratives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cancer Research, U.K., http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st... Accessed 26th April 2016.
    1. Matala CM, McIntosh SA, Purushotham AD. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1455–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01593.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harcourt D, Rumsey N. Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35(4):477–87. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01865.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Clinical Excellence., Breast cancer (early & locally advanced): diagnosis and treatment. Vol. Clinical guidelines CG80. 2009.
    1. Jeevan R, et al, The National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit. A national audit of provision and outcomes of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery for women in England. Second Annual Report. Vol. IC23090109. 2009.