Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep 30;19(3):103-112.
doi: 10.5770/cgj.19.225. eCollection 2016 Sep.

Frailty and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: a Scoping Review

Katherine McKenzie  1 , Lynn Martin  2 , Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz  1
Affiliations
Review

Frailty and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: a Scoping Review

Katherine McKenzie et al. Can Geriatr J. .

Abstract

Background: Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are both living longer than in previous generations and experiencing premature aging. Improved understanding of frailty in this aging population may inform community supports and avoid negative outcomes.

Methods: The objective of this study was to review the literature on frailty and IDD and determine areas for future research and application. The methodological framework for a scoping review as developed by H. Arksey and L. O'Malley was applied to identify and select original studies published since 2000.

Results: Seventeen studies were identified; these were based on the work of researchers from four research programs. The studies utilized six measures of frailty, including two frailty indices, the VFQ-ID(-R), the frailty phenotype, and the frailty marker. Frailty was equally studied as an outcome and as predictor for other outcomes (e.g., mobility, falls, care intensity, institutionalization, and survival).

Conclusions: There is evidence of a growing interest in the measurement of frailty in aging adults with IDD. As in the general population, frailty in this group is associated with many negative outcomes. While a few measures have emerged, more work is required to replicate results, validate tools, and test the feasibility of applying frailty measures in practice and to inform policy.

Keywords: developmental disabilities; epidemiology; frail; frailty; intellectual disabilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Flowchart of search results
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Ageing and intellectual disabilities- improving longevity and promoting healthy ageing: summative report. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2000.
    1. Ouellette-Kuntz H, Garcin N, Lewis S, et al. Addressing health disparities through promoting equity for individuals with intellectual disability. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(S2):S8–S22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ouellette-Kuntz H, Martin L. Applied Health Research Question Report: Aging profiles of adults with and without developmental disabilities in Ontario. Toronto, ON: H-CARDD; 2014.
    1. Issacs BJ, Jaakkimainen RL, Barnsley J, et al. Health services utilization. In: Lunsky Y, Klein-Geltink JE, Yates EA, editors. Atlas on the primary care of adults with developmental disabilities in Ontario. Toronto, ON: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; 2013. pp. 41–62.
    1. Ouellette-Kuntz H, Martin L, McKenzie K. Chapter 6 – A review of health surveillance in older adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Int Rev Res Develop Disabil. 2015;48:151–94. doi: 10.1016/bs.irrdd.2015.03.004. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources