Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 11;10(10):CD002142.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002142.pub4.

Postoperative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Affiliations
Review

Postoperative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Sarah Burdett et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the treatment of patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was not clear. A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate available evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). These results were first published in Lung Cancer in 2013.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of PORT on survival and recurrence in patients with completely resected NSCLC. To investigate whether predefined patient subgroups benefit more or less from PORT.

Search methods: We supplemented MEDLINE and CANCERLIT searches (1965 to 8 July 2016) with information from trial registers, handsearching of relevant meeting proceedings and discussion with trialists and organisations.

Selection criteria: We included trials of surgery versus surgery plus radiotherapy, provided they randomised participants with NSCLC using a method that precluded prior knowledge of treatment assignment.

Data collection and analysis: We carried out a quantitative meta-analysis using updated information from individual participants from all randomised trials. We sought data on all participants from those responsible for the trial. We obtained updated individual participant data (IPD) on survival and date of last follow-up, as well as details on treatment allocation, date of randomisation, age, sex, histological cell type, stage, nodal status and performance status. To avoid potential bias, we requested information on all randomised participants, including those excluded from investigators' original analyses. We conducted all analyses on intention-to-treat on the endpoint of survival.

Main results: We identified 14 trials evaluating surgery versus surgery plus radiotherapy. Individual participant data were available for 11 of these trials, and our analyses are based on 2343 participants (1511 deaths). Results show a significant adverse effect of PORT on survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.18, or an 18% relative increase in risk of death. This is equivalent to an absolute detriment of 5% at two years (95% confidence interval (CI) 2% to 9%), reducing overall survival from 58% to 53%. Subgroup analyses showed no differences in effects of PORT by any participant subgroup covariate.We did not undertake analysis of the effects of PORT on quality of life and adverse events. Investigators did not routinely collect quality of life information during these trials, and it was unlikely that any benefit of PORT would offset the observed survival disadvantage. We considered risk of bias in the included trials to be low.

Authors' conclusions: Results from 11 trials and 2343 participants show that PORT is detrimental to those with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer and should not be used in the routine treatment of such patients. Results of ongoing RCTs will clarify the effects of modern radiotherapy in patients with N2 tumours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
2
2
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
3
3
Overall survival.
4
4
PORT effect on overall survival by trial according to stage.
5
5
Hazard ratio (HR) for the interaction between the effect of PORT on survival and (a) stage or (b) nodal status.
6
6
Sensitivity analysis 1: only trials with all stage subgroups included.
7
7
Sensitivity analysis (2): only trials with stage II and III subgroups represented.
8
8
PORT effect on overall survival by trial according to nodal status.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Surgery + PORT versus surgery alone, Outcome 1 Survival.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Surgery + PORT versus surgery alone, Outcome 2 Local recurrence‐free survival.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Surgery + PORT versus surgery alone, Outcome 3 Distant recurrence‐free survival.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Surgery + PORT versus surgery alone, Outcome 4 Recurrence‐free survival.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Surgery + PORT versus surgery alone, Outcome 5 RT delivery method.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Surgery + PORT versus surgery alone, Outcome 6 RT dose.

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Belgium 1966 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Houtte P, Rocmans P, Smets P, Goffin JC, Lustman‐Marecal J, Vanderhoeft P, et al. Postoperative radiation therapy in lung cancer: a controlled trial after resection of curative design. International Journal of Radiation, Oncology, Biology and Physics 1980;6:983‐6. - PubMed
CAMS 1981 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Feng QF, Wang M, Wang LJ, Yang ZY, Zhang YG, Zhang DW, et al. A study of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2000;47(4):925‐9. - PubMed
EORTC 08861 {unpublished data only}
    1. EORTC 08861(unpublished). Phase III randomised trial of adjuvant radiotherapy vs no adjuvant therapy with completely resected non‐small cell lung cancer.
GETCB 04CB86 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Dautzenberg B, Arriagada R, Chammard AB, Jarema A, Mezzetti M, Mattson K, et al. for the Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement des Cancers Bronchiques. A controlled study of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 1999; Vol. 86, issue 2:265‐273. - PubMed
GETCB 05CB88 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Dautzenberg B, Arriagada R, Chammard AB, Jarema A, Mezzetti M, Mattson K, et al. for the Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement des Cancer Bronchiques. A controlled study of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 1999;86(2):265‐73; Vol. 86, issue 2:265‐273. - PubMed
Italy 2002 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Trodella L, Granone P, Valente S, Valentini V, Balducci M, Mantini G, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer with pathological stage I: definitive results of a phase III randomised trial. Radiotherapy and Oncology 2002;62:11‐9. - PubMed
Korea 2007 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Park JH. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for stage IIIa non‐small cell lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2007;2 (8 Suppl 4):S651.
LCSG 773 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Lung Cancer Study Group. Effects of postoperative mediastinal radiation on completely resected stage II and stage III epidermoid cancer of the lung. New England Journal of Medicine 1986;315(22):1377‐81. - PubMed
Lille 1985 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Lafitte JJ, Ribet ME, Prévost BM, Gosselin BH, Copin M‐C, Brichet AH. Post‐irradiation for T2 N0 M0 non‐small cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1996;62:830‐4. - PubMed
MRC LU11 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Stephens RJ, Girling DJ, Bleehen NM, Moghissi K, Yosef HMA, Machin D. The role of post‐operative radiotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer: a multicentre randomised trial in patients with pathologically staged T1‐2, N1‐2, M0 disease. British Journal of Cancer 1996;74:632‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Slovenia 1988 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Debevec M, Bitenc M, Vidmar S, Rott T, Orel J, Strojan P, et al. Post‐operative radiotherapy for radically resected N2 non‐small cell lung cancer: randomised clinical study 1988‐92. Lung Cancer 1996;14:99‐107. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Austria 1996 {published data only}
    1. Mayer R, Smolle‐Juettner F‐M, Szolar D, Stuecklschweiger GF, Quehenberger F, Friehs G, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in radically resected non‐small cell lung cancer. Chest 1997;112:954‐9. - PubMed
Dymek 2003 {published data only}
    1. Dymek P, Kowalska T, Reinfuss M, Walasek T, Zareba‐Szlubowska M, Mitus J, et al. The efficacy of adjuvant thoracic radiation therapy in NSCLC patients with ipsilateral mediastinal/hilar lymph node involvement [Ocena skutecznosci pooperacyjnej teleradioterapii chorych na NDRP zoperowanych miejscowo doszczetnie z obecnoscia przerzutow w usunietych wezlach chlonnych srodpiersia albo wneki (kontrolowane doswiadczenie kliniczne)]. Pneumonol Alergol Pol 2003;71(11‐12):496‐503. - PubMed
LCSG 841 {unpublished data only}
    1. Lung Cancer Study Group (Unpublished). Phase III randomised study of post‐op radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy following resection of non‐small cell lung cancer.

References to ongoing studies

Lung ART‐IGR 2006/1202 {unpublished data only}
    1. LUNG ART‐IGR 2006/1202 (ongoing). Phase III study comparing post‐operative conformal radiotherapy to no post‐operative radiotherapy in patients with completely resected non‐small cell lung cancer and mediastinal N2 involvement. NCT00410683.

Additional references

American Cancer Society 2007
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2007. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2007.
Billiet 2014
    1. Billiet C, Dealuwe H, Peeters S, Vansteenkiste J, Dooms C, Haustermans K, et al. Corrigendum to "Modern post‐operative radiotherapy for stage III non‐small cell lung cancer may improve local control and survival: A meta‐analysis". Radiotherapy and Oncology 2014;113(2):300‐1. - PubMed
Datta 2003
    1. Datta D, Lahiri B. Preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing lung resection surgery. Chest 2003;123:2096‐103. - PubMed
Dickersin 1995
    1. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. In: Chalmers I, Altman DG editor(s). Systematic Reviews. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1995:17‐36. - PMC - PubMed
Fisher 2011
    1. Fisher DJ, Copas AJ, Tierney JF, Parmar MKB. A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient‐level interactions in individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis of randomised trials, and guidance for practitioners. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64:949‐67. - PubMed
Higgins 2002
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:1539‐58. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ‐ Version 5.0.1 [updated in September 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Jemal 2011
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2011;61:69‐90. - PubMed
Kaplan 1958
    1. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1958;53:457‐81.
Lefebvre 2001
    1. Lefebvre C, Clarke MJ. Identifying randomised trials. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Healthcare. 2nd Edition. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001:69‐87.
Lefebvre 2008
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J, on behalf of the Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2008:95‐150.
Mountain 1987
    1. Mountain CF. The new international staging system for lung cancer. Surgical Clinics of North America 1987;67(5):925‐35. - PubMed
Mountain 1997
    1. Mountain CF. Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest 1997;111(6):1710‐7. - PubMed
NSCLCCG 1995
    1. Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer: a meta‐analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. British Medical Journal 1995;311(7010):899‐909. - PMC - PubMed
Parmar 1995
    1. Parmar MKB, Machin D. Survival Analysis: A Practical Approach. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1995.
Patel 2014
    1. Patel SH, Ma Y, Wernicke AG, Nori D, Chao KSC, Parashar B. Evidence supporting contemporary post‐operative radiation therapy (PORT) using linear accelerators in N2 lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2014;84:156‐60. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3.5. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Schemper 1996
    1. Schemper M, Smith TL. A note on quantifying follow‐up in studies of failure time. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17(4):343‐6. - PubMed
Stata 2013 [Computer program]
    1. StataCorp LP. StataCorp 2013. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2013.
Yusuf 1985
    1. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P. Beta‐blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomised trials. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 1985;27(5):335‐71. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

PORT 1998
    1. PORT Meta‐analysis Trialists Group. Postoperative radiotherapy in non‐small‐cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis of individual patient data from nine randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1998;352:257‐63. - PubMed
PORT 2005
    1. Burdett S, Stewart L, on behalf of the PORT Meta‐analysis Trialist Group. Postoperative radiotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer: update of an individual patient data meta‐analysis. Lung Cancer 2005;47(1):81‐3. - PubMed
PORT 2013
    1. Burdett S, Rydzewska L, Tierney JF, Fisher DJ. A closer look at the effects of postoperative radiotherapy by stage and nodal status: updated results of an individual participant data meta‐analysis in non‐small‐cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2013;80:350‐2. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources