Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;68(6):933-943.
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

Isolated De Novo Antiendothelial Cell Antibodies and Kidney Transplant Rejection

Affiliations

Isolated De Novo Antiendothelial Cell Antibodies and Kidney Transplant Rejection

Elena Sánchez-Zapardiel et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Studies analyzing the role of antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) in large series of kidney transplant recipients are scarce, and HLA, MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I-related chain A (MICA), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor have not been formally excluded as targets.

Study design: Retrospective study of a cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

Setting & participants: 324 kidney transplant recipients who were negative for anti-HLA, anti-MICA, and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies were tested for AECAs in pre- and posttransplantation serum samples.

Predictors: AECA-positive (preformed [pre+/post+] vs de novo [pre-/post+]) versus AECA-negative (pre-/post-) before or after transplantation.

Outcomes: Patient mortality, transplant loss, and acute rejection events.

Results: 66 (20%) patients were AECA positive (39 [12%] preformed, 27 [8%] de novo) and 258 (80%) were AECA negative. During a follow-up of 10 years, 7 (18%) AECA pre+/post+ patients had rejections compared with 14 (52%) AECA pre-/post+ and 57 (22%) AECA pre-/post- recipients (OR, 3.80; P=0.001). AECA pre-/post+ status emerged as an independent risk factor for transplant rejection compared to the AECA pre-/post- group (OR, 5.17; P<0.001). However, AECA pre+/post+ and AECA pre-/post+ patients did not show higher risk for either patient death (ORs of 1.49 [P=0.7] and 1.06 [P=0.9], respectively) or transplant loss (ORs of 1.22 and 0.86, respectively; P for both = 0.8) compared to the AECA pre-/post- population.

Limitations: Retrospective study. Posttransplantation sera were collected before or after rejection, entailing a nearly cross-sectional relationship between the exposure and outcome. Lack of identification of precise antigens for AECAs.

Conclusions: De novo AECAs may be associated with rejection. These antibodies might serve as biomarkers of endothelium damage in kidney transplant recipients.

Keywords: Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs); acute rejection; allograft loss; allograft rejection; de novo antibodies; immunofluorescence patterns; kidney transplantation; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources