Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 12;90(19):8842-54.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.01163-16. Print 2016 Oct 1.

Virus-Like Particles Displaying Trimeric Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Envelope gp160 Enhance the Breadth of DNA/Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara SIV Vaccine-Induced Antibody Responses in Rhesus Macaques

Affiliations

Virus-Like Particles Displaying Trimeric Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Envelope gp160 Enhance the Breadth of DNA/Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara SIV Vaccine-Induced Antibody Responses in Rhesus Macaques

Smita S Iyer et al. J Virol. .

Abstract

The encouraging results of the RV144 vaccine trial have spurred interest in poxvirus prime-protein boost human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine modalities as a strategy to induce protective immunity. Because vaccine-induced protective immunity is critically determined by HIV envelope (Env) conformation, significant efforts are directed toward generating soluble trimeric Env immunogens that assume native structures. Using the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-macaque model, we tested the immunogenicity and efficacy of sequential immunizations with DNA (D), modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) (M), and protein immunogens, all expressing virus-like particles (VLPs) displaying membrane-anchored trimeric Env. A single VLP protein boost displaying trimeric gp160 adjuvanted with nanoparticle-encapsulated Toll-like receptor 4/7/8 (TLR4/7/8) agonists, administered 44 weeks after the second MVA immunization, induced up to a 3-fold increase in Env-specific IgG binding titers in serum and mucosa. Importantly, the VLP protein boost increased binding antibody against scaffolded V1V2, antibody-dependent phagocytic activity against VLP-coated beads, and antibody breadth and neutralizing antibody titers against homologous and heterologous tier 1 SIVs. Following 5 weekly intrarectal SIVmac251 challenges, two of seven DNA/MVA and VLP (DM+VLP)-vaccinated animals were completely protected compared to productive infection in all seven DM-vaccinated animals. Vaccinated animals demonstrated stronger acute viral pulldown than controls, but a trend for higher acute viremia was observed in the DM+VLP group, likely due to a slower recall of Gag-specific CD8 T cells. Our findings support immunization with VLPs containing trimeric Env as a strategy to augment protective antibody but underscore the need for optimal engagement of CD8 T cells to achieve robust early viral control.

Importance: The development of an effective HIV vaccine remains a global necessity for preventing HIV infection and reducing the burden of AIDS. While this goal represents a formidable challenge, the modest efficacy of the RV144 trial indicates that multicomponent vaccination regimens that elicit both cellular and humoral immune responses can prevent HIV infection in humans. However, whether protein immunizations synergize with DNA prime-viral vector boosts to enhance cellular and humoral immune responses remains poorly understood. We addressed this question in a nonhuman primate model, and our findings show benefit for sequential protein immunization combined with a potent adjuvant in boosting antibody titers induced by a preceding DNA/MVA immunization. This promising strategy can be further developed to enhance neutralizing antibody responses and boost CD8 T cells to provide robust protection and viral control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Characterization of SIV VLPs produced in 293F cells. (A) Western blot analysis of sucrose fractions collected from a 20 to 60% sucrose gradient. Supernatants collected from 293F producer cells were pelleted through 20% sucrose, resuspended, and loaded onto a 20 to 60% gradient. Twelve fractions were collected from top to bottom. (B) Transmission electron micrograph of SIV VLPs budding from 293F producer cells. N, nucleus.
FIG 2
FIG 2
NP-adjuvanted VLP protein boost elicits strong recall of DNA/MVA-induced anti-Env binding Ab titers in sera. (A) Experimental design. (B) Kinetics of Env-specific binding after each booster immunization against soluble gp140 and ConA-captured VLP-derived gp160. Geometric means and standard errors of the means are shown. (C) Magnitude of gp140 or ConA-captured gp160 Env-specific IgG response 2 weeks after the second MVA immunization (n = 14) and 2 weeks after VLP immunization (n = 7) as determined by an ELISA (background, 0.07 μg/ml). (D) Magnitude of gp120-specific (background, 0.006 μg/ml) (*, P < 0.05) and HIV gp36-specific (highly homologous to SIV gp41) (background, 0.008 μg/ml) IgG responses as determined by using a BAMA. (E) Magnitude of SIV p55-specific IgG responses. (F) Comparison of antibody responses at the memory time point after the second MVA and VLP boosts. *, P < 0.05.
FIG 3
FIG 3
NP-adjuvanted VLP protein boost elicits strong recall of serum antibody with neutralization and antibody-dependent phagocytosis activities. (A) Kinetics of neutralization against homologous SIVmac251.6 and heterologous SIVsmE660 tissue culture laboratory-adapted (TCLA) tier 1 viruses, measured by using a TZM-bl cell-based assay. (B) Fold increase in neutralization titers at the peak time point after VLP immunization relative to the second MVA immunization (*, P < 0.05). (C) Scatter plots showing associations between gp140 binding titers and SIVmac251 neutralization responses in sera (R2 = 0.61; *, P < 0.05 at peak). (D and E) Increase in phagocytosis scores (ADP score of vaccine sera/ADP score of naive monkey sera) measured against SIVmac251 gp120-coated beads at a 1:2,000 dilution of sera (E) and ADP score measured against SIV239 VLP-coated beads at a 1:200 dilution of sera in THP-1 monocytes at the peak time point post-VLP immunization compared to the peak time point after the second MVA immunization (E) (*, P < 0.05). Kinetic data show geometric means and standard errors of the means. ID50, 50% infectious dose.
FIG 4
FIG 4
NP-adjuvanted VLP protein boost elicits strong increases in Env-specific IgG and IgA titers in rectal mucosa. (A) Kinetics of gp140-specific IgG in rectal mucosa. Scatter plots show increases in binding titers against gp140 (**, P < 0.01). (B) gp120- and HIV gp36 (highly homologous to SIV gp41)-specific IgG titers after VLP boost at the peak time point relative to the second MVA immunization, measured by a BAMA (*, P < 0.01). (C) Robust induction of gp140-specific IgA responses in rectal mucosa following the VLP boost (**, P < 0.01). (D) gp120- and HIV gp36-specific IgA titers after VLP boost at the peak time point relative to the second MVA immunization, measured by a BAMA (*, P < 0.01). Kinetic data are shown as geometric means and standard errors of the means.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Breadth/epitope specificity after VLP immunization. Linear epitope mapping of sera was performed against a peptide library of 15-mers overlapping by 12 covering SIV239 gp160. (A) Signal intensity computed after baseline subtraction for defined regions of gp160 at the peak time point after the second MVA immunization and at the peak time point post-VLP immunization. (B) Heat map overview of signal intensity values for each region for 7 animals at peak MVA and VLP time points. Values of >200 are considered positive. (C) Increase in epitope specificity for C5, V2, gp41-ID, and KE regions after VLP boost (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). (D) Proportion of responses to different regions with a KE-dominant response after VLP boost. (E) Anti-gp70 V1V2 IgG titers in sera as measured by ELISAs correlate with binding intensity against the linear V1b peptide. ns, not significant. (F) Anti-gp70 V1V2 titers are significantly increased in mucosal secretions following VLP boost and correlate with responses in sera (*, P < 0.05). (G) Negative electron microscopy stain of VLPs from an HIV Gag construct showing an image of a broken VLP identified by a visible Gag protein lattice (arrow) together with three unbroken VLPs.
FIG 6
FIG 6
NP-adjuvanted VLP immunization elicits SIV-specific IFN-γ-centric CD4 T cell responses. (A) Flow plots showing coproduction of IFN-γ with IL-2, IL-21, and TNF-α in PBMCs after stimulation with Gag peptide pools 1 week after the second MVA immunization and 1 week post-VLP immunization. The background frequency from unstimulated PBMCs is shown in gray. (B, left) Kinetics of Gag- and Env-specific CD4 T cell responses (geometric means and standard errors of the means) over the course of immunization. (Right) Magnitude of IFN-γ-positive (IFN-γ+) responses to Gag and Env antigens (geometric means and standard errors of the means) 1 week after the second MVA immunization and 1 week post-VLP immunization. (C) Boolean gating analysis of cytokine-positive populations after stimulation for production of IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α, or IL-21. Each responding cell is assigned to 1 of 15 possible combinations of IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α, or IL-21, and data are presented as a pie chart illustrating polyfunctionality. (D) Ag-specific CD8 T cells are not recalled after VLP immunization. The bar graph shows kinetics of Gag- and Env-specific CD8 T cell responses (geometric means and standard errors of the means) over the course of immunization.
FIG 7
FIG 7
Acquisition and viral control in DM and DM+VLP vaccine regimens. (A) Acquisition curves against intrarectal SIVmac251 challenge. (B) SIV239 anti-gp70 V1V2 IgG titers (micrograms per milliliter) in serum are correlated with protection. UI, uninfected (C) Kinetics of viral loads after productive infection (* indicates significant differences between controls and each of the vaccinated groups, with a P value of <0.05; △ indicates significant differences between vaccine groups, with a P value of <0.05; and ** indicates a P value of <0.01). (D) Scatter plots showing virus control in vaccinated animals at week 1, week 3, and week 24 postinfection. (E) Viral load kinetics in control, DM, and DM+VLP groups. The red X's in the control group for three animals indicate euthanasia due to the development of AIDS-related complications. Data for A*01 animals in each of the groups are shown in green. Kinetic data are shown as medians and standard errors of the means for each group.
FIG 8
FIG 8
Immune correlates of viral control. (A) Kinetics of SIV-specific CD8 T cell responses following infection. The magnitude of the Gag-specific CD8 T cell response at week 3 postinfection correlates inversely with the viral load at week 3 (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05). (B) Kinetics of SIV-specific CD4 T cell responses following infection. The magnitude of Gag-specific CD4 T cell responses at week 3 correlates inversely with the viral load at week 3 in unvaccinated controls (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05). (C) Kinetics of gp140-specific antibody titers following infection. The magnitude of titers at week 7 correlates inversely with the week 7 viral load in unvaccinated controls (**, P < 0.01). Kinetic data are shown as median values for each group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fauci AS, Folkers GK, Marston HD. 2014. Ending the global HIV/AIDS pandemic: the critical role of an HIV vaccine. Clin Infect Dis 59(Suppl 2):S80–S84. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu420. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, Kaewkungwal J, Chiu J, Paris R, Premsri N, Namwat C, de Souza M, Adams E, Benenson M, Gurunathan S, Tartaglia J, McNeil JG, Francis DP, Stablein D, Birx DL, Chunsuttiwat S, Khamboonruang C, Thongcharoen P, Robb ML, Michael NL, Kunasol P, Kim JH. 2009. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med 361:2209–2220. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim JH, Excler JL, Michael NL. 2015. Lessons from the RV144 Thai phase III HIV-1 vaccine trial and the search for correlates of protection. Annu Rev Med 66:423–437. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-052912-123749. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esparza J. 2013. A brief history of the global effort to develop a preventive HIV vaccine. Vaccine 31:3502–3518. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corey L, Gilbert PB, Tomaras GD, Haynes BF, Pantaleo G, Fauci AS. 2015. Immune correlates of vaccine protection against HIV-1 acquisition. Sci Transl Med 7:310rv7. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aac7732. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms