Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):78-85.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0402OC.

Effect of Nintedanib in Subgroups of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis by Diagnostic Criteria

Affiliations

Effect of Nintedanib in Subgroups of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis by Diagnostic Criteria

Ganesh Raghu et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Rationale: In the absence of a surgical lung biopsy, patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in clinical practice could participate in the INPULSIS trials of nintedanib if they had honeycombing and/or traction bronchiectasis plus reticulation, without atypical features of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Thus, the patients in these trials represented patients with definite UIP and a large subgroup of patients with possible UIP.

Objectives: To investigate the potential impact of diagnostic subgroups on the progression of IPF and the effect of nintedanib.

Methods: We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with honeycombing on HRCT and/or confirmation of UIP by biopsy versus patients without either, using pooled data from the INPULSIS trials.

Measurements and main results: Seven hundred twenty-three (68.1%) patients had honeycombing and/or biopsy, and 338 (31.9%) patients had no honeycombing or biopsy. In these subgroups, respectively, the adjusted annual rate of decline in FVC in patients treated with placebo was -225.7 and -221.0 ml/yr, and the nintedanib versus placebo difference in the adjusted annual rate of decline in FVC was 117.0 ml/yr (95% confidence interval, 76.3-157.8) and 98.9 ml/yr (95% confidence interval, 36.4-161.5). There was no significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction (P = 0.8139). Adverse events were similar between the subgroups.

Conclusions: Patients with IPF diagnosed in clinical practice who had possible UIP with traction bronchiectasis on HRCT and had not undergone surgical lung biopsy had disease that progressed in a similar way, and responded similarly to nintedanib, to that of patients with honeycombing on HRCT and/or confirmation of UIP by biopsy.

Keywords: HRCT; diagnosis; high-resolution computed tomography; honeycombing; traction bronchiectasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Eligibility criteria based on high-resolution computed tomography (upper, middle, and lower zones). (A) Criteria A, B, and C met. (B) Criteria B and C met.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Annual rate of decline in FVC (ml/yr) by subgroup. CI = confidence interval; HRCT = high-resolution computed tomography; UIP = usual interstitial pneumonia.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Change from baseline in FVC over time by subgroup. SLB = surgical lung biopsy; UIP = usual interstitial pneumonia.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Time to first acute exacerbation over 52 weeks by subgroup. SLB = surgical lung biopsy; UIP = usual interstitial pneumonia.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Change from baseline in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score over 52 weeks by subgroup. CI = confidence interval; HRCT = high-resolution computed tomography; UIP = usual interstitial pneumonia.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, Martinez FJ, Behr J, Brown KK, Colby TV, Cordier JF, Flaherty KR, Lasky JA, et al. ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Committee on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:788–824. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flaherty KR, Andrei AC, King TE, Jr, Raghu G, Colby TV, Wells A, Bassily N, Brown K, du Bois R, Flint A, et al. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: do community and academic physicians agree on diagnosis? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:1054–1060. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flaherty KR, King TE, Jr, Raghu G, Lynch JP, III, Colby TV, Travis WD, Gross BH, Kazerooni EA, Toews GB, Long Q, et al. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: what is the effect of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:904–910. - PubMed
    1. Kreider ME, Hansen-Flaschen J, Ahmad NN, Rossman MD, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC, Shrager JB. Complications of video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy in patients with interstitial lung disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1140–1144. - PubMed
    1. Ryerson CJ, Urbania TH, Richeldi L, Mooney JJ, Lee JS, Jones KD, Elicker BM, Koth LL, King TE, Jr, Wolters PJ, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:750–757. - PubMed

Publication types