Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 7:20:83.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1267-8.

Characteristics and outcomes of anti-infective de-escalation during health care-associated intra-abdominal infections

Affiliations

Characteristics and outcomes of anti-infective de-escalation during health care-associated intra-abdominal infections

Philippe Montravers et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: De-escalation is strongly recommended for antibiotic stewardship. No studies have addressed this issue in the context of health care-associated intra-abdominal infections (HCIAI). We analyzed the factors that could interfere with this process and their clinical consequences in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with HCIAI.

Methods: All consecutive patients admitted for the management of HCIAI who survived more than 3 days following their diagnosis, who remained in the ICU for more than 3 days, and who did not undergo early reoperation during the first 3 days were analyzed prospectively in an observational, single-center study in a tertiary care university hospital.

Results: Overall, 311 patients with HCIAI were admitted to the ICU. De-escalation was applied in 110 patients (53%), and no de-escalation was reported in 96 patients (47%) (escalation in 65 [32%] and unchanged regimen in 31 [15%]). Lower proportions of Enterococcus faecium, nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB), and multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains were cultured in the de-escalation group. No clinical difference was observed at day 7 between patients who were de-escalated and those who were not. Determinants of de-escalation in multivariate analysis were adequate empiric therapy (OR 9.60, 95% CI 4.02-22.97) and empiric use of vancomycin (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.46-7.87), carbapenems (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.01-6.91), and aminoglycosides (OR 2.31 95% CI 1.08-4.94). The presence of NFGNB (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.89) and the presence of MDR bacteria (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.52) were risk factors for non-de-escalation. De-escalation did not change the overall duration of therapy. The risk factors for death at day 28 were presence of fungi (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.34-5.17), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on admission (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.16-1.42), and age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05). The survival rate expressed by a Kaplan-Meier curve was similar between groups (log-rank test p value 0.176).

Conclusions: De-escalation is a feasible option in patients with polymicrobial infections such as HCIAI, but MDR organisms and NFGNB limit its implementation.

Keywords: Antibiotic therapy; De-escalation; Health care-associated intra-abdominal infections; Multidrug-resistant bacteria; Peritonitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the 206 patients studied. ICU intensive care unit
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with de-escalation, without any change, and with escalation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weiss E, Zahar JR, Lesprit P, Ruppe E, Leone M, Chastre J, et al. Elaboration of a consensual definition of de-escalation allowing a ranking of β-lactams. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:649.e1–10. - PubMed
    1. Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE, Jr, Gerding DN, Weinstein RA, Burke JP, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:159–77. doi: 10.1086/510393. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garnacho-Montero J, Gutiérrez-Pizarraya A, Escoresca-Ortega A, Corcia-Palomo Y, Fernández-Delgado E, Herrera-Melero I, et al. De-escalation of empirical therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:32–40. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3077-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giantsou E, Liratzopoulos N, Efraimidou E, Panopoulou M, Alepopoulou E, Kartali-Ktenidou S, et al. De-escalation therapy rates are significantly higher by bronchoalveolar lavage than by tracheal aspirate. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1533–40. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0619-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed