Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar 15;30(6):611-21.
doi: 10.1101/gad.273805.115.

Building up the nucleus: nuclear organization in the establishment of totipotency and pluripotency during mammalian development

Máté Borsos  1 , Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla  1
Affiliations
Review

Building up the nucleus: nuclear organization in the establishment of totipotency and pluripotency during mammalian development

Máté Borsos et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

In mammals, epigenetic reprogramming, the acquisition and loss of totipotency, and the first cell fate decision all occur within a 3-d window after fertilization from the one-cell zygote to the formation of the blastocyst. These processes are poorly understood in molecular detail, yet this is an essential prerequisite to uncover principles of stem cells, chromatin biology, and thus regenerative medicine. A unique feature of preimplantation development is the drastic genome-wide changes occurring to nuclear architecture. From studying somatic and in vitro cultured embryonic stem cells (ESCs) it is becoming increasingly established that the three-dimensional (3D) positions of genomic loci relative to each other and to specific compartments of the nucleus can act on the regulation of gene expression, potentially driving cell fate. However, the functionality, mechanisms, and molecular characteristics of the changes in nuclear organization during preimplantation development are only now beginning to be unraveled. Here, we discuss the peculiarities of nuclear compartments and chromatin organization during mammalian preimplantation development in the context of the transition from totipotency to pluripotency.

Keywords: mouse embryo; nuclear architecture; totipotency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Changes of chromatin organization during preimplantation development. (A) Schematic representation of the main building blocks and their organization on a mouse chromosome. rDNA repeats are present in only five of the 20 chromosomes in mice. (B) The differences in nuclear organization between mature gametes, preimplantation stages, and somatic cells are readily observable by a simple DNA (DAPI) staining. The top part of the scheme depicts the localization of the repetitive DNA elements studied by FISH: major satellites (green), minor satellites (yellow), rDNA (purple), and distal telomeres (red). In the mature sperm, rDNA and centromeric repeats cluster in the center, while distal telomeres are peripheral. During oocyte growth, centromeric repeats gradually assemble into a ring-like structure around the nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs) and stay associated with them until the late two-cell stage, when they start reclustering into chromocenters, similar to somatic cells (fibroblast). rDNA is associated with the periphery of NPBs in oocytes and early embryos and gradually occupies nucleolar localization as somatic-like nucleoli form in place of NPBs. The localization of telomeres has not been determined in oocytes and, apart from the mature sperm, their localization has not been associated with nuclear compartments. The second scheme shows the localization of gene-rich (orange) and gene-poor (green) chromosomes as well as paternal (light blue) and maternal (pink) X chromosomes. Based on studies in bovine embryos, the gene density of a chromosome does not correlate with its radial position prior to embryonic genome activation (EGA, which occurs at the eight-cell stage in cattle and at the two-cell stage in mice). However, after EGA, gene-poor chromosomes occupy more peripheral localization compared with gene-dense ones. The imprinted inactive paternal X chromosome is preferably associated with the NPB in two- and four-cell stage mouse embryos but relocates from the NPB by the eight-cell stage. In the somatic cell depicted, due to random X inactivation, one of the X chromosomes forms the Barr body, preferentially located at the nuclear periphery.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aguirre-Lavin T, Adenot P, Bonnet-Garnier A, Lehmann G, Fleurot R, Boulesteix C, Debey P, Beaujean N. 2012. 3D-FISH analysis of embryonic nuclei in mouse highlights several abrupt changes of nuclear organization during preimplantation development. BMC Dev Biol 12: 30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed K, Dehghani H, Rugg-Gunn P, Fussner E, Rossant J, Bazett-Jones DP. 2010. Global chromatin architecture reflects pluripotency and lineage commitment in the early mouse embryo. PLoS One 5: e10531. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiken CE, Swoboda PP, Skepper JN, Johnson MH. 2004. The direct measurement of embryogenic volume and nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio during mouse pre-implantation development. Reproduction 128: 527–535. - PubMed
    1. Amendola M, van Steensel B. 2015. Nuclear lamins are not required for lamina-associated domain organization in mouse embryonic stem cells. EMBO Rep 16: 610–617. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrey G, Montavon T, Mascrez B, Gonzalez F, Noordermeer D, Leleu M, Trono D, Spitz F, Duboule D. 2013. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 340: 1234167. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources