Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb 25:16:45.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0735-7.

Validation of online psychometric instruments for common mental health disorders: a systematic review

Wouter van Ballegooijen  1   2   3 , Heleen Riper  4   5 , Pim Cuijpers  6   7 , Patricia van Oppen  8   9 , Johannes H Smit  10   11
Affiliations
Review

Validation of online psychometric instruments for common mental health disorders: a systematic review

Wouter van Ballegooijen et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Online questionnaires for measuring common mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety disorders are increasingly used. The psychometrics of several pen-and-paper questionnaires have been re-examined for online use and new online instruments have been developed and tested for validity as well. This study aims to review and synthesise the literature on this subject and provide a framework for future research.

Methods: We searched Medline and PsycINFO for psychometric studies on online instruments for common mental health disorders and extracted the psychometric data. Studies were coded and assessed for quality by independent raters.

Results: We included 56 studies on 62 online instruments. For common instruments such as the CES-D, MADRS-S and HADS there is mounting evidence for adequate psychometric properties. Further results are scattered over different instruments and different psychometric characteristics. Few studies included patient populations.

Conclusions: We found at least one online measure for each of the included mental health disorders and symptoms. A small number of online questionnaires have been studied thoroughly. This study provides an overview of online instruments to refer to when choosing an instrument for assessing common mental health disorders online, and can structure future psychometric research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of included studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Common mental health disorders: Identification and pathways to care. London: NICE; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Alfonsson S, Maathz P, Hursti T. Interformat reliability of digital psychiatric self-report questionnaires: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12) doi: 10.2196/jmir.3395. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hedman E, Ljotsson B, Ruck C, Furmark T, Carlbring P, Lindefors N, et al. Internet administration of self-report measures commonly used in research on social anxiety disorder: A psychometric evaluation. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(4):736–40. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.010. - DOI
    1. Carlbring P, Brunt S, Bohman S, Austin D, Richards J, Ost LG, et al. Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research. Comput Hum Behav. 2007;23(3):1421–34. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.05.002. - DOI
    1. Cuijpers P, Boluijt P, Van SA. Screening of depression in adolescents through the Internet : sensitivity and specificity of two screening questionnaires. Eur Child AdolescPsychiatry. 2008;17(1):32–8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-007-0631-2. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms