[Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Measurement of Hepatic Stiffness Using Different Direct Inverse Problem Reconstruction Methods in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Liver Disease]
- PMID: 26902377
- DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2016_JSRT_72.2.128
[Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Measurement of Hepatic Stiffness Using Different Direct Inverse Problem Reconstruction Methods in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Liver Disease]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the mean hepatic stiffness values obtained by the application of two different direct inverse problem reconstruction methods to magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Thirteen healthy men (23.2±2.1 years) and 16 patients with liver diseases (78.9±4.3 years; 12 men and 4 women) were examined for this study using a 3.0 T-MRI. The healthy volunteers underwent three consecutive scans, two 70-Hz waveform and a 50-Hz waveform scans. On the other hand, the patients with liver disease underwent scanning using the 70-Hz waveform only. The MRE data for each subject was processed twice for calculation of the mean hepatic stiffness (Pa), once using the multiscale direct inversion (MSDI) and once using the multimodel direct inversion (MMDI). There were no significant differences in the mean stiffness values among the scans obtained with two 70-Hz and different waveforms. However, the mean stiffness values obtained with the MSDI technique (with mask: 2895.3±255.8 Pa, without mask: 2940.6±265.4 Pa) were larger than those obtained with the MMDI technique (with mask: 2614.0±242.1 Pa, without mask: 2699.2±273.5 Pa). The reproducibility of measurements obtained using the two techniques was high for both the healthy volunteers [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs): 0.840-0.953] and the patients (ICC: 0.830-0.995). These results suggest that knowledge of the characteristics of different direct inversion algorithms is important for longitudinal liver stiffness assessments such as the comparison of different scanners and evaluation of the response to fibrosis therapy.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic resonance elastography: evaluation of new inversion algorithm and quantitative analysis method.Abdom Imaging. 2015 Apr;40(4):810-7. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0372-5. Abdom Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25742725
-
Preliminary Comparison of Multi-scale and Multi-model Direct Inversion Algorithms for 3T MR Elastography.Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Jan 10;16(1):73-77. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2016-0047. Epub 2016 Oct 11. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 27725575 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance elastography: feasibility of liver stiffness measurements in healthy volunteers at 3T.Clin Radiol. 2012 Mar;67(3):258-62. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.08.022. Epub 2011 Oct 19. Clin Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22014555
-
Advances in Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2020 Aug;28(3):331-340. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Jun 6. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2020. PMID: 32624152 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2015 Nov;90-91:32-48. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 23. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2015. PMID: 26592944 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical