Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;68(10):1530-7.
doi: 10.1002/acr.22844. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

Development and First Validation of a Disease Activity Score for Gout

Collaborators, Affiliations

Development and First Validation of a Disease Activity Score for Gout

Carlo A Scirè et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a new composite disease activity score for gout and provide its first validation.

Methods: Disease activity has been defined as the ongoing presence of urate deposits that lead to acute arthritis and joint damage. Every measure for each Outcome Measures in Rheumatology core domain was considered. A 3-step approach (factor analysis, linear discriminant analysis, and linear regression) was applied to derive the Gout Activity Score (GAS). Decision to change treatment or 6-month flare count were used as the surrogate criteria of high disease activity. Baseline and 12-month followup data of 446 patients included in the Kick-Off of the Italian Network for Gout cohort were used. Construct- and criterion-related validity were tested. External validation on an independent sample is reported.

Results: Factor analysis identified 5 factors: patient-reported outcomes, joint examination, flares, tophi, and serum uric acid (sUA). Discriminant function analysis resulted in a correct classification of 79%. Linear regression analysis identified a first candidate GAS including 12-month flare count, sUA, visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, VAS global activity assessment, swollen and tender joint counts, and a cumulative measure of tophi. Alternative scores were also developed. The developed GAS demonstrated a good correlation with functional disability (criterion validity) and discrimination between patient- and physician-reported measures of active disease (construct validity). The results were reproduced in the external sample.

Conclusion: This study developed and validated a composite measure of disease activity in gout. Further testing is required to confirm its generalizability, responsiveness, and usefulness in assisting with clinical decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Formula for the calculation of different candidate gout activity scores. GAS = Gout Activity Score; sUA = serum uric acid (mg/dl); VAS = visual analog scale (0–10 cm); TJC = tender joint count (0–68); SJC = swollen joint count (0–66).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stamp LK, Khanna PP, Dalbeth N, Boers M, Maksymowych WP, Schumacher HR, et al. Serum urate in chronic gout: will it be the first validated soluble biomarker in rheumatology? J Rheumatol 2011;38:1462–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stamp LK, Zhu X, Dalbeth N, Jordan S, Edwards NL, Taylor W. Serum urate as a soluble biomarker in chronic gout: evidence that serum urate fulfills the OMERACT validation criteria for soluble biomarkers. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2011;40:483–500. - PubMed
    1. Taylor WJ, Brown M, Aati O, Weatherall M, Dalbeth N. Do patient preferences for core outcome domains for chronic gout studies support the validity of composite response criteria? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65:1259–64. - PubMed
    1. Perez‐Ruiz F. Treating to target: a strategy to cure gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:ii9–14. - PubMed
    1. Taylor WJ, Singh JA, Saag KG, Dalbeth N, MacDonald PA, Edwards NL, et al. Bringing it all together: a novel approach to the development of response criteria for chronic gout clinical trials. J Rheumatol 2011;38:1467–70. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms