Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
- PMID: 26756737
- DOI: 10.7326/M15-0970
Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
Erratum in
-
Correction: Harms of Breast Cancer Screening.Ann Intern Med. 2018 Nov 20;169(10):740. doi: 10.7326/L18-0570. Ann Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30452573 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended biennial mammography screening for women aged 50 to 74 years and selective screening for those aged 40 to 49 years.
Purpose: To review studies of screening in average-risk women with mammography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasonography that reported on false-positive results, overdiagnosis, anxiety, pain, and radiation exposure.
Data sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases through December 2014.
Study selection: English-language systematic reviews, randomized trials, and observational studies of screening.
Data extraction: Investigators extracted and confirmed data from studies and dual-rated study quality. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus.
Data synthesis: Based on 2 studies of U.S. data, 10-year cumulative rates of false-positive mammography results and biopsies were higher with annual than biennial screening (61% vs. 42% and 7% vs. 5%, respectively) and for women aged 40 to 49 years, those with dense breasts, and those using combination hormone therapy. Twenty-nine studies using different methods reported overdiagnosis rates of 0% to 54%; rates from randomized trials were 11% to 22%. Women with false-positive results reported more anxiety, distress, and breast cancer-specific worry, although results varied across 80 observational studies. Thirty-nine observational studies indicated that some women reported pain during mammography (1% to 77%); of these, 11% to 46% declined future screening. Models estimated 2 to 11 screening-related deaths from radiation-induced cancer per 100,000 women using digital mammography, depending on age and screening interval. Five observational studies of tomosynthesis and mammography indicated increased biopsies but reduced recalls compared with mammography alone.
Limitations: Studies of overdiagnosis were highly heterogeneous, and estimates varied depending on the analytic approach. Studies of anxiety and pain used different outcome measures. Radiation exposure was based on models.
Conclusion: False-positive results are common and are higher for annual screening, younger women, and women with dense breasts. Although overdiagnosis, anxiety, pain, and radiation exposure may cause harm, their effects on individual women are difficult to estimate and vary widely.
Primary funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Comment in
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: In women ≥ 40 years of age at average risk, breast cancer screening causes some harms.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):JC39. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2016-164-8-039. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27089087 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-1. PMID: 26889531 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26757170
-
Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):268-78. doi: 10.7326/M15-1789. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26757021 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26756588 Review.
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Screening for Breast Cancer: A Comparative Review of Guidelines.Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;14(6):777. doi: 10.3390/life14060777. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38929759 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program after a false-positive result in the Local Health Authority of Bologna (Italy).Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 20;11(1):8530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87864-x. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33879804 Free PMC article.
-
AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2019.Breast Care (Basel). 2019 Aug;14(4):224-245. doi: 10.1159/000501000. Epub 2019 Aug 6. Breast Care (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31558897 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Utilization and Cost of Mammography Screening Among Commercially Insured Women 50 to 64 Years of Age in the United States, 2012-2016.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Mar;29(3):327-337. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7543. Epub 2019 Oct 15. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020. PMID: 31613693 Free PMC article.
-
Does patient age affect the PPV3 of ACR BI-RADS Ultrasound categories 4 and 5 in the diagnostic setting?Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2492-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5203-3. Epub 2018 Jan 4. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29302783
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical