Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation
- PMID: 26671514
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4353-8
Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation
Abstract
Purpose: The primary objective of this paper was to provide a systematic review of the available clinical studies of Ti/PEEK combined cages in spinal interbody fusion surgeries, focusing on their radiological and clinical outcomes. A secondary aim was to provide a review and evaluation of the in vitro and preclinical studies reported on Ti/PEEK-coated implants.
Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in March 2015 via three databases: Medline, Embase and Cochrane library. The following key search terms were combined with synonyms to identify relevant articles: "spinal fusion," "PEEK," "titanium" and "cage."
Results: The novelty of this intervention translates into a paucity of clinical trials, albeit the results of the seven clinical studies that met the criteria for inclusion are promising. All studies reported rate of fusion as a primary outcome. Two studies reported slightly improved fusion in the experimental Ti/PEEK combination cohort, one study identical fusion (91.7 %) and three studies excellent fusion (96, 100 and 94 %) in the Ti/PEEK cohort, although no differences reached statistical significance.
Conclusions: Clinical studies at this early stage demonstrate that Ti/PEEK implants are safe and efficacious, exhibiting similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes compared to the current standard PEEK. There is clinical evidence substantiating the improved radiographic fusion of Ti/PEEK, albeit the differences were not significant. This field is promising, gaining substantial popularity, and further clinical trials are needed in the future to establish Ti/PEEK cages as a mainstay of clinical practice.
Keywords: Cage; PEEK; Spinal fusion; Ti/PEEK; Titanium.
Similar articles
-
Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1285-1295. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06748-w. Epub 2021 Feb 8. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33555365 Review.
-
Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.062. Epub 2017 Jul 21. J Clin Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28736113 Review.
-
Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.J Orthop Sci. 2020 Jul;25(4):565-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 30. J Orthop Sci. 2020. PMID: 31375363
-
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review.Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1446-60. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Dec 27. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 24374100 Review.
-
[Clinical and Radiological Results after Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Cage Fusion - a Retrospective Comparison of PEEK vs. Titanium Cages].Z Orthop Unfall. 2017 Apr;155(2):201-208. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118717. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Z Orthop Unfall. 2017. PMID: 28073140 German.
Cited by
-
3D-printed titanium alloy cage in anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease.J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):22-29. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-120. Epub 2024 Mar 14. J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 38567003 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single-centre randomised study.Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):332-338. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07947-3. Epub 2023 Sep 22. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 37737497 Clinical Trial.
-
Titanium‑coated polyetheretherketone cages vs. polyetheretherketone cages in lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.Exp Ther Med. 2023 May 9;25(6):305. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12004. eCollection 2023 Jun. Exp Ther Med. 2023. PMID: 37229321 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of expandable versus static lordotic interbody implants in minimally invasive spine surgery: patient reported outcomes, sagittal alignment, and restoration of disc height and foraminal height.J Spine Surg. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):39-53. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-55. Epub 2023 Jan 9. J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 37038423 Free PMC article.
-
Single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion: an overview of terminology, concepts, rationale and the current evidence base.Eur Spine J. 2022 Sep;31(9):2167-2174. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07229-4. Epub 2022 Aug 1. Eur Spine J. 2022. PMID: 35913621 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous