Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Conventionally Fractionated Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Altered Fractionation Radiotherapy Alone in the Definitive Management of Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- PMID: 26454839
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.09.002
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Conventionally Fractionated Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Altered Fractionation Radiotherapy Alone in the Definitive Management of Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
Aims: Treatment intensification either by using concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or altered fractionation radiotherapy (AFRT) improves outcomes of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The superiority of one approach over the other, however, remains to be firmly established. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes of CCRT versus AFRT in the definitive non-surgical management of locoregionally advanced HNSCC for evidence-based decision making.
Materials and methods: An electronic search of Medline via PubMed was conducted with no language, year, or publication status restrictions. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) were also searched electronically. Only randomised controlled trials assigning HNSCC patients randomly to conventionally fractionated CCRT or AFRT alone were included. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and pooled using the Cochrane methodology for meta-analysis and expressed as a hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Overall survival was the primary outcome of interest, whereas disease-free survival, locoregional control and toxicity were secondary end points.
Results: Five randomised controlled trials (involving 1117 patients and 627 deaths) directly comparing conventionally fractionated CCRT with AFRT alone were included. The risk of bias in included studies was low for efficacy outcomes, but high for toxicity outcomes. The overall pooled hazard ratio of death was 0.73 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.86), which significantly favoured conventionally fractionated CCRT over AFRT alone (P < 0.0001). Similarly, disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.68-0.92; P = 0.002) and locoregional control (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.59-0.84; P < 0.0001) were significantly improved with CCRT. There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe acute toxicity (dermatitis and mucositis) between the two approaches of treatment intensification. Late xerostomia was significantly increased with CCRT. Significant haematological toxicity and nephrotoxicity were seen exclusively with chemotherapy.
Conclusion: There is moderate quality evidence that conventionally fractionated CCRT improves survival outcomes compared with AFRT alone in the definitive radiotherapeutic management of locoregionally advanced HNSCC. No form of acceleration can potentially compensate fully for the lack of concurrent chemotherapy.
Keywords: Altered fractionation; chemoradiotherapy; concurrent; head and neck cancer; meta-analysis.
Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus altered fractionation radiotherapy in the radiotherapeutic management of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis.Head Neck. 2015 May;37(5):670-6. doi: 10.1002/hed.23661. Epub 2014 Apr 30. Head Neck. 2015. PMID: 24596112 Review.
-
Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of the currently available treatment options.Oral Oncol. 2018 May;80:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 27. Oral Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29706187
-
Weekly Low-Dose Versus Three-Weekly High-Dose Cisplatin for Concurrent Chemoradiation in Locoregionally Advanced Non-Nasopharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Data.Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1056-1066. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0015. Epub 2017 May 22. Oncologist. 2017. PMID: 28533474 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.J BUON. 2009 Jul-Sep;14(3):361-73. J BUON. 2009. PMID: 19810125 Review.
-
Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis.Oncologist. 2016 Jan;21(1):59-71. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0246. Epub 2015 Dec 28. Oncologist. 2016. PMID: 26712958 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Early Competing Deaths in Locally Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer.Indian J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct-Dec;24(4):446-450. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_91_18. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018. PMID: 30410256 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-mediated cavitation enhances the delivery of an EGFR-targeting liposomal formulation designed for chemo-radionuclide therapy.Theranostics. 2019 Jul 28;9(19):5595-5609. doi: 10.7150/thno.34669. eCollection 2019. Theranostics. 2019. PMID: 31534505 Free PMC article.
-
Serum Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines and Leptin as Potential Biomarkers for Treatment Response and Toxicity in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.Diseases. 2024 Mar 11;12(3):55. doi: 10.3390/diseases12030055. Diseases. 2024. PMID: 38534979 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Conventional Fractionation and Accelerated Fractionation With Concomitant Boost for Radiotherapy of Non-metastatic Stage IV Head-and-Neck Cancer.In Vivo. 2021 Jan-Feb;35(1):411-415. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12272. In Vivo. 2021. PMID: 33402490 Free PMC article.
-
Radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer-technical aspects and alternate fractionation.J Radiat Res. 2017 Jul 1;58(4):495-508. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrx023. J Radiat Res. 2017. PMID: 28898958 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical