Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;35(1):105-13.
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000635.

Expression of NeuGc on Pig Corneas and Its Potential Significance in Pig Corneal Xenotransplantation

Affiliations

Expression of NeuGc on Pig Corneas and Its Potential Significance in Pig Corneal Xenotransplantation

Whayoung Lee et al. Cornea. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Pigs expressing neither galactose-α1,3-galactose (Gal) nor N-glycolylneuraminic acid (NeuGc) take xenotransplantation one step closer to the clinic. Our aims were (1) to document the lack of NeuGc expression on corneas and aortas and cultured endothelial cells [aortic endothelial cells (AECs); corneal (CECs)] of GTKO/NeuGcKO pigs, and (2) to investigate whether the absence of NeuGc reduced human antibody binding to the tissues and cells.

Methods: Wild-type (WT), GTKO, and GTKO/NeuGcKO pigs were used for the study. Human tissues and cultured cells were negative controls. Immunofluorescence staining was performed using anti-Gal and anti-NeuGc antibodies, and human IgM and IgG binding to tissues was determined. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine Gal and NeuGc expression on cultured CECs and AECs and to measure human IgM/IgG binding to these cells.

Results: Both Gal and NeuGc were detected on WT pig corneas and aortas. Although GTKO pigs expressed NeuGc, neither humans nor GTKO/NeuGcKO pigs expressed Gal or NeuGc. Human IgM/IgG binding to corneas and aortas from GTKO and GTKO/NeuGcKO pigs was reduced compared with binding to WT pigs. Human antibody binding to GTKO/NeuGcKO AECs was significantly less than that to GTKO AECs, but there was no significant difference in binding between GTKO and GTKO/NeuGcKO CECs.

Conclusions: The absence of NeuGc on GTKO aortic tissue and AECs is associated with reduced human antibody binding, and possibly will provide a better outcome in clinical xenotransplantation using vascularized organs. For clinical corneal xenotransplantation, the absence of NeuGc expression on GTKO/NeuGcKO pig corneas may not prove an advantage over GTKO corneas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Gal (green) expression on corneas by immunofluorescence WT pig corneas expressed Gal (largely on anterior stroma), whereas GTKO, GTKO/NeuGcKO, and human corneas were negative for Gal expression. (B) NeuGc (red) expression on corneas by immunofluorescence Corneas from WT pigs and GTKO pigs of two different genetic backgrounds expressed NeuGc on the epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cells (and stroma), but NeuGc was not detectable on either GTKO/NeuGcKO pig or human corneas. (C) Expression of Gal and NeuGc on aortas Aortas from WT pigs expressed Gal on the endothelial cells (red arrows) and NeuGc. GTKO pigs of two different genetic backgrounds expressed NeuGc, but not Gal. Neither Gal nor NeuGc was detectable on GTKO/NeuGcKO pig aortas from two different genetic backgrounds. Figures are representative of at least 3 different experiments. (Magnification 200x; nuclei – blue; Gal – green; NeuGc – red).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Gal and NeuGc expression on CECs (A, B) and AECs (C, D) by flow cytometry
(A, C) WT pCECs and pAECs expressed Gal whereas CECs and AECs from GTKO, GTKO/NeuGcKO, and human corneas and aortas did not. (B, D) WT and GTKO pCECs and pAECs expressed NeuGc to varying extents. NeuGc was not expressed on either GTKO/NeuGcKO pig or human CECs and AECs. Figures are representative of experiments with WT cells (n=3), Revivicor GTKO cells (n=3), NSRRC GTKO cells (n=2), Indiana university GTKO/NeuGcKO cells (n=2), Revivicor GTKO/NeuGcKO cells (CECs; n=6, AECs; n=2 respectively), and human cells (n=2). rMFI= relative mean fluorescence intensity
Figure 3
Figure 3. Levels of NeuGc expression on CECs (A) and AECs (B) by flow cytometry
(A, B) The level of NeuGc expression of pCECs and pAECs from different sources differed. Expression of NeuGc on CECs of NSRRC GTKO pigs appeared to be higher than on CECs of Revivicor GTKO pigs. Statistical analysis was not possible due to the small number of samples tested. Figures are from different samples from WT pigs (n=3), Revivicor GTKO pigs (n=3), NSRRC GTKO pigs (n=2), Indiana university GTKO/NeuGcKO pigs (n=2), Revivicor GTKO/NeuGcKO pigs (CECs; n=6, AECs; n=2 respectively), and humans (n=2). rMFI= relative mean fluorescence intensity
Figure 4
Figure 4. Human antibody binding to pig and human corneas by immunofluorescence
(A) Human IgM binding to corneas after co-culture with 20% pooled human serum. Compared to binding to WT corneas, human IgM binding to GTKO corneas was decreased and further decreased to GTKO/NeuGcKO corneas. However, there was still some binding, especially in the limbal area. There was minimal IgM binding to a human cornea. (B) Human IgG binding to corneas after co-culture with 5% pooled human serum. Compared to binding to WT corneas, human IgG binding to GTKO corneas was decreased and further decreased to GTKO/NeuGcKO corneas. There was minimal IgG binding to a human cornea. (C) Human IgM and IgG binding to aortas after co-culture with pooled human serum (20% for IgM and 5% for IgG respectively) Compared to binding to WT aortas, human IgM/IgG binding to GTKO aorta was decreased, and further decreased to GTKO/NeuGcKO aortas, particularly to the aortic endothelium. Figures are representative of at least 3 different experiments. (Magnification 200x; nuclei – blue; IgM - green, IgG – green)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Human IgM and IgG antibody binding to CECs (A and B) and AECs (C and D) by flow cytometry using different individual human sera
(A) Human IgM binding to WT pCECs was variable, but binding to GTKO and GTKO/NeuGcKO pig CECs and to human CECs was significantly decreased (n=6, *p<0.05). Binding of human IgM antibody to human CECs was significantly lower than to all other pCECs (*p<0.05). There was no significant difference in binding to GTKO and GTKO/NeuGcKO pCECs. (B) Human IgG binding to WT CECs was variable, but binding to GTKO, GTKO/NeuGcKO, or human CECs was significantly decreased (n=6, *p<0.05). There was no significant difference in binding to GTKO, GTKO/NeuGcKO, and human CECs. (C) Human IgM binding to WT pAECs was variable, but binding to GTKO and GTKO/NeuGcKO pAECs was significantly decreased (n=6, *p<0.05). There was no significant difference in IgM binding to pAECs from GTKO pigs of the two different genetic backgrounds, but binding to GTKO pAECs was significantly greater than to GTKO/NeuGcKO pAECs (* p<0.05; ns=not significant). There was no significant difference in IgM binding to pAECs from GTKO/NeuGcKO pigs of the two different genetic backgrounds. Binding of human IgM antibody to human CECs was significantly lower than to all other pCECs (* p<0.05). (D) Human IgG binding to WT and GTKO pAECs and was variable, but almost no binding to GTKO/NeuGcKO pAECs was detected. Compared to WT pAECs, human IgG binding to GTKO and GTKO/NeuGcKO pAECs was significantly decreased (n=6, * p<0.05). There was no significant difference in IgG binding to GTKO pAECs of the two different genetic backgrounds, but binding to GTKO pAECs was significantly greater than to GTKO/NeuGcKO pAECs (* p<0.05; ns=not significant). There was no significant difference in IgG binding to pAECs from GTKO/NeuGcKO pigs of the two different genetic backgrounds.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Phelps CJ, Koike C, Vaught TD, et al. Production of alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs. Science. 2003;299:411–414. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lutz AJ, Li P, Estrada JL, et al. Double knockout pigs deficient in N-glycolylneuraminic acid and galactose alpha-1,3-galactose reduce the humoral barrier to xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2013;20:27–35. - PubMed
    1. Zhu A, Hurst R. Anti-N-glycolylneuraminic acid antibodies identified in healthy human serum. Xenotransplantation. 2002;9:376–381. - PubMed
    1. Salama A, Evanno G, Harb J, et al. Potential deleterious role of anti-Neu5Gc antibodies in xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2015;22:85–94. - PubMed
    1. Miwa Y, Kobayashi T, Nagasaka T, et al. Are N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Hanganutziu-Deicher) antigens important in pig-to-human xenotransplantation? Xenotransplantation. 2004;11:247–253. - PubMed

Publication types