Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 5;17(5):597-610.
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

HDAC8 Inhibition Specifically Targets Inv(16) Acute Myeloid Leukemic Stem Cells by Restoring p53 Acetylation

Affiliations

HDAC8 Inhibition Specifically Targets Inv(16) Acute Myeloid Leukemic Stem Cells by Restoring p53 Acetylation

Jing Qi et al. Cell Stem Cell. .

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is driven and sustained by leukemia stem cells (LSCs) with unlimited self-renewal capacity and resistance to chemotherapy. Mutation in the TP53 tumor suppressor is relatively rare in de novo AML; however, p53 can be regulated through post-translational mechanisms. Here, we show that p53 activity is inhibited in inv(16)(+) AML LSCs via interactions with the CBFβ-SMMHC (CM) fusion protein and histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8). HDAC8 aberrantly deacetylates p53 and promotes LSC transformation and maintenance. HDAC8 deficiency or inhibition using HDAC8-selective inhibitors (HDAC8i) effectively restores p53 acetylation and activity. Importantly, HDAC8 inhibition induces apoptosis in inv(16)(+) AML CD34(+) cells, while sparing the normal hematopoietic stem cells. Furthermore, in vivo HDAC8i administration profoundly diminishes AML propagation and abrogates leukemia-initiating capacity of both murine and patient-derived LSCs. This study elucidates an HDAC8-mediated p53-inactivating mechanism promoting LSC activity and highlights HDAC8 inhibition as a promising approach to selectively target inv(16)(+) LSCs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that no conflicts of interest exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. CM fusion protein binds to p53 and impairs p53 acetylation
A. Western blot time course analysis of Ac-p53, p53, CM, CBFβ, β-actin after IR (3 Gy) in CM-expressing or control BM cells. B. Western blot time course analysis of Ac-p53, p53, CM, CBFβ, HDAC8 and β-actin after IR (3Gy) in 32D-CM or 32D-CBFβ cells. C. Western blot of Ac-p53, p53, CM, CBFβ, β-actin in Cbfb56M/+ BM progenitor cells transduced with MIG-Cre and stimulated with IR (3Gy, 6 h). D. Western blot of Ac-p53, p53, CM, CBFβ, β-actin in 32D-CM cells expressing control (Ctrl)-shRNA or CM-shRNA (A3, D4) 6 h after IR. E. Western blot of CM and β-actin (top) and relative expression of p53 target genes in sorted AML cells transduced with ctrl-shRNA or CM-shRNA (A3, D4) and induced with IR (bottom). Shown are fold change (mean ± SD) relative to ctrl-shRNA-expressing cells, performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. F. Co-IP and immunoblot (IB) analysis in 32D-CM (top) or 32D-CBFβ (bottom) cells using anti-p53 or anti-mouse IgG for IP, and anti-p53 (left) or anti-CBFβ (right) for IB. G. Representative images of Duolink in situ PLA using mouse anti-CBFβ, rabbit anti-p53 antibodies and PLA probes. Red foci indicate CM-p53 interactions (left), DAPI-stained nuclei are in blue (center) and GFP+ indicates transduced cells (right); scale bar, 10 μm. H. Co-IP (anti-CBFβ) and IB (anti-p53 or anti-CBFβ) analysis in control BM or CM BM cells with or without IR (3Gy). I. Co-IP (anti-p53 or IgG) and IB (anti- CBFβ or anti-p53) in inv(16)+ AML (163, 987) or non-inv(16) AML (467, 865) CD34+ cells 3h after IR. See also Figure S1.
Figure 2
Figure 2. CM fusion protein recruits HDAC8 and p53 in a protein complex and promotes the deacetylation of p53 by HDAC8
A. Sequential co-IP (1° IP anti-HDAC8 or anti-p53, 2° IP anti-CBFβ) and IB (anti-p53 or anti-HDAC8) analysis in 32D-CBFβ or CM cells that were not IR (left) or IR (3 Gy)-treated (right). B. Illustration of CM deletion variants (left) used in the co-IP (anti-p53) and IB (anti-CBFβ or anti-p53) analysis (right). Red arrows indicate the expected size of CM variants. C. Representative images of in situ PLA in 32D FL-CM, d134, d179, ΔC95, Ctrl- or Hdac8-shRNA (sh1 or sh2) expressing cells using mouse anti-CBFβ, rabbit anti-p53 and PLA probes. CM-p53 interactions are shown in red (top), DAPI staining is in blue (center) and the GFP reporter indicates transduced cells (bottom); scale bar, 10 μm. D. Co-IP (IgG or anti-p53) and IB (anti-CBFβ or anti-p53) in 32D-CM cells expressing Ctrl- or Hdac8-shRNA (sh1 or sh2). E. Western blotting of Hdac8, Ac-p53 (K379), p53 and β-actin in 32D-CM cells expressing Ctrl- or Hdac8-shRNA after IR (3Gy, 6h). F. Western blotting of Ac-p53, p53 in CM-, ΔC95-, CBFβ- or FLAG-expressing 32D cells before or after IR (3Gy). G. Fold induction of p53 target genes in CBFβ, CM or CM-ΔC95 expressing cells, 24h after 3Gy IR. Bars represent mean ± SD duplicated assays and two experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. See also Figure S2.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Hdac8 deletion diminishes CM-induced LSC transformation and promotes p53 activation
A. Western blot analysis of Hdac8, CM, CBFβ in BM cells from Cbfb56M/+/Mx1-Cre (CM) or CM/Hdac8KO mice 2 weeks after 7 doses of pIpC treatment. B. Western blotting of Ac-p53, p53 before or after (2h) IR (3Gy) in pre-leukemic CM or CM/Hdac8KO BM cells. C. Kaplan-Meier survival curve of induced CM (n=23; median survival 122 days) or CM/Hdac8KO mice (n=56) mice monitored up to 1 year. D. Western blotting of Ac-p53, p53, Hdac8 and β-actin in 32D-CM cells treated with indicated dose of HDAC8i PCI-34051 (μM), 22d (μM) or Nutlin-3 (2.5 μM) for 6 h. E. Western blotting of Ac-p53, p53, Ac-Smc3, Smc3, and β-actin in 32D-CM cells treated with 22d (5 μM), MS-275 (2.5 μM), TV6 (2.5 μM), PCI-24781 (200 nM) or Nutlin-3 (2.5 μM). F. Fold activation of p53 targets in 32D-CM cells treated with HDAC8i PCI-34051 (10 μM) or 22d (10 μM) for 16 h, relative to levels in vehicle-treated cells (dashed line). Shown are mean ± SD of triplicated qRT-PCR assays and two experiments. G. Fold activation of p53 targets in primary CM (n=4) or CM/Hdac8KO (n=5) progenitors cells treated with the HDAC8i 22d (10 μM) for 16 h, relative to levels in vehicle treated cells (dashed line). Mean ± SD of triplicated qRT-PCR assays are shown. H. Survival inhibition dose-response curve and IC50 of HDAC8i 22d for 32D-CBFβ, 32D-CM or 32D-CM cells overexpressing HDAC8. I. Western blot analysis of Ac-p53, p53, Ac-SMC3, SMC3, HDAC8 and β-actin in 32D-CM cells with or without HDAC8 overexpression (O/E) treated with 22d (0, 2.5, 5, 10 μM). J. Fold induction of luciferase reporter under the control of p53 responsive elements in K562 cells co-transfected with CM and p53-WT or p53-8KR mutant, and treated with 22d (10 μM). Dashed line indicates levels in vehicle treated cells. Mean ± SD of four assays in two experiments are shown. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; see also Figure S3.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Inhibition of HDAC8 selectively induces p53-dependent apoptosis in inv(16)+ AML stem/progenitor cells
A. Relative expression of HDAC8 in normal (NL) PBSC (n=7; mean indicated by dashed line), inv(16)+ AML (n=7) or non-inv(16)+ AML (n=19) CD34+ cells. Each dot represents the average of triplicate qRT-PCR assays from an individual patient and line indicates the mean ± SEM of all samples. B. Percent survival of NL (n=7), inv(16)+ AML (n=12), t(8;21) AML (n=3) or other non-inv(16) AML (n=4) CD34+ cells treated with HDAC8i 22d for 48 h, measured by Annexin V labeling. Each dot represents an individual subject and lines indicate the mean ± SEM. C. Survival inhibition dose-response curve and IC50 of HDAC8i 22d for NL, inv(16)+ AML, t(8;21) AML or other non-inv(16) AML CD34+ cells as described in B. D. Western blots of Ac-p53 (K382), p53 and β-actin in inv(16)+ AML CD34+ cells treated with 22d (10 μM) or Nutlin-3 (2.5 μM) for 6 h. Shown are representative results from four patients. E. Fold induction of p53 target genes in inv(16)+ AML CD34+ (n=9–13) or NL CD34+ (n=7) cells treated with 22d (10 μM) for 16 h, relative to the levels in vehicle-treated cells (dashed line). Each dot represents the mean of triplicated qRT-PCR assay for an individual subject and the lines indicate the mean ± SEM. F. Representative FACS plot of Annexin V/DAPI labeling in inv(16)+ AML CD34+ cells expressing control (ctrl) or p53 shRNA (GFP+) and treated with 22d for 48 h. G. Relative survival of sorted GFP+ inv(16)+ AML CD34+ cells expressing ctrl- or p53-shRNA treated with 22d for 48 h (top). Each dot represents an individual patient and the lines indicate mean ± SEM. Dose-response curve and IC50 of shctrl- (solid line) or shp53-cells (dashed line) treated with 22d (bottom). H. Percent survival of inv(16)+ AML (n=3–7) CD34+ cells treated with 22d (5 or 10 μM) or combined with DNR (50 or 100 nM) or Ara-C (0.2, 1, 5μM). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns: not significant. See also Figure S4 and Table S1.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Ex vivo treatment of HDAC8i 22d diminishes AML engraftment and leukemia initiation
A. Schematic illustration of the experimental design. AML cells were isolated from pIpC-induced Cbfb+/56MMx1Cre/tdTomato+ moribund mice, treated with 22d or vehicle for 48 or 72 h and transplanted into congenic mice. Engraftment of AML in PB was monitored over time (4, 8 weeks). Mice were analyzed for BM and spleen engraftment at 8 weeks or monitored for leukemia onset and survival up to 8 months. B. Engraftment of AML cells in the PB at 4 (n=7; P=0.0006) or 8 weeks (vehicle, n=5; 22d, n=7; P=0.0025). Shown are mean ± SEM. C. Representative images of spleens from recipients of vehicle-treated (top) or 22d-treated cells (bottom) at 8 weeks. D. Representative FACS plots and frequencies of engrafted dTomato+/cKit+ AML cells in the BM at 8 weeks. E. Frequency of AML cells in the BM of recipients of vehicle treated (n=5) or 22d treated cells (n=7). Each dot represent results from an individual mouse and lines indicate mean ± SEM. **P=0.0025 F. Frequency of AML cells in the spleen of recipients of vehicle-treated (n=5) or 22d-treated cells (n=7). **P=0.0025 G. Survival curve of mice transplanted with AML cells treated with 22d (n=8) or vehicle (n=11; ***P=0.0007). H. The frequency of dTomato+ cells in the PB 8 weeks after transplantation of 2×106 live AML cells treated with 22d or vehicle ex vivo for 48 h (n=4). Each dot represents results from individual mice and line indicate mean ± SEM. *P=0.0357 I. The frequency of dTomato+/ckit+ cells in the BM 28 weeks after transplantation of 2×106 live cells treated with 22d (n=4) or vehicle (n=2; another 2 had died of AML prior to analysis) ex vivo for 48 h (n=4). Each dot represents results from individual mice and line indicate mean ± SEM. *P=0.0206 J. Survival curve of mice transplanted with 2×106 live AML cells treated with 22d or vehicle (n=4; **P=0.0091). See also Figure S5.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Administration of HDAC8i 22d in vivo effectively reduces AML burden and abrogates LSC activity
A. Schematic illustration of the experimental design. CM/tdTomato+ AML cells (2×106) were transplanted into cohorts of congenic mice. After 5–6 weeks, mice were treated with vehicle or 22d (50mg/kg/dose) twice a day for 2 weeks. AML engraftment was analyzed at the end of treatment and BM cells were transplanted into second recipients, which were analyzed for engraftment at 8 weeks or monitored for leukemia onset and survival monitored up to 1 year. B. Western blot analysis of Ac-p53, Ac-SMC3 levels in BM cells from mice treated with HDAC8i 22d or vehicle. C. Representative FACS plots showing gating and frequency of dTomato+/cKit+ AML cells in the BM of vehicle- (top) or 22d (bottom)-treated mice. D. Frequency of AML cells in the BM of mice treated with vehicle (n=13) or 22d (n=13) for 2 weeks. Each dot represents results from an individual mouse and lines indicate mean ± SEM. **P=0.0097 E. Total number of AML cells in the BM of mice treated with vehicle (n=13) or 22d (n=13) for 2 weeks. *P=0.01 F. Frequency of AML cells in the BM of secondary transplant recipients of BM from vehicle- (n=5) or 22d-treated (n=4) mice. ***P<0.0001 G. Total number of AML cells in the BM of second transplant recipients of vehicle (n=5) or 22d treated (n=4) BM. ***P=0.0006 H. Spleen weight of second transplant recipients of vehicle (n=5) or 22d treated (n=4) BM. *P=0.0159 I. Survival curve of second transplant recipients of vehicle- (n=5) or 22d-treated (n=4) BM. **P=0.0049
Figure 7
Figure 7. Propagation of primary inv(16)+ AML is diminished by in vivo HDAC8i 22d treatment
A. Schematic illustration of the experimental design. Primary inv(16)+ AML cells from patient AML1070 (see Table S1) were depleted of T cells and directly injected intrafemorally into irradiated (300cGy) NSGS mice (1×106 cells/mouse). Human AML hCD45+ cells were selected from the leukemic BM for transplantation (2×106 hCD45+ cells/mouse) into larger cohorts of NSGS mice. When AML progression is evident, we began treatment with 22d (50mg/kg/dose) or vehicle twice daily for 2 weeks. Treated mice were then analyzed for AML burden and BM cells were transplanted into secondary recipients. B. Representative FACS plots showing gating and frequency of hCD45+ (left) and hCD45+/CD34+ (right) cells in mice received vehicle (top) or 22d (bottom) treatment for 2 weeks. C. Frequency of hCD45+ AML cells in the PB of vehicle or 22d treated mice (n=5; P=0.0159). D. Frequency of hCD45+ AML cells in the BM of vehicle or 22d treated mice (n=5; P=0.0079). E. Frequency of hCD45+/CD34+ AML cells in the BM of vehicle or 22d treated mice (n=5; P=0.0079). F. The spleen weight of mice treated with vehicle (n=5) or 22d (n=5). *P=0.0159 G. Representative FACS plots of hCD45+/CD34+ AML cell frequency in BM of vehicle- or 22d-treated secondary transplants 12 weeks after transplantation. H. Frequency of hCD45+ AML cells in BM of vehicle- or 22d-treated secondary transplants (n=4; P=0.0007). I. Frequency of hCD45+/CD34+ AML cells in BM of vehicle- or 22d-treated secondary transplants (n=4; P=0.0006). J. Frequency of immunophenotypic populations within hCD45+ cells in BM of vehicle- or 22d-treated secondary transplants (n=4; *P<0.05; ***P<0.001). K. Survival curve of 2nd transplant recipients of vehicle- (n=4) or 22d-treated (n=3) BM up to 5 months after transplantation. *P=0.0285 See also Figure S6.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adya N, Stacy T, Speck NA, Liu PP. The leukemic protein core binding factor beta (CBFβ)-smooth-muscle myosin heavy chain sequesters CBFalpha2 into cytoskeletal filaments and aggregates. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:7432–443. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amann JM, Nip J, Strom DK, Lutterbach B, Harada H, Lenny N, Downing JR, Meyers S, Hiebert SW. ETO, a target of t(8;21) in acute leukemia, makes distinct contacts with multiple histone deacetylases and binds mSin3A through its oligomerization domain. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:6470–483. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balasubramanian S, Ramos J, Luo W, Sirisawad M, Verner E, Buggy JJ. A novel histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8)-specific inhibitor PCI-34051 induces apoptosis in T-cell lymphomas. Leukemia. 2008;22:1026–034. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Ami O, Friedman D, Leshkowitz D, Goldenberg D, Orlovsky K, Pencovich N, Lotem J, Tanay A, Groner Y. Addiction of t(8;21) and inv(16) Acute Myeloid Leukemia to Native RUNX1. Cell Rep. 2013;4:1131–143. - PubMed
    1. Bots M, Verbrugge I, Martin BP, Salmon JM, Ghisi M, Baker A, Stanley K, Shortt J, Ossenkoppele GJ, et al. Differentiation therapy for the treatment of t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia using histone deacetylase inhibitors. Blood. 2014;123:1341–352. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms