Neoadjuvant 5-FU or Capecitabine Plus Radiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 26374429
- PMCID: PMC4849360
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv248
Neoadjuvant 5-FU or Capecitabine Plus Radiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial
Erratum in
-
Erratum.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Mar 8;108(4):djw057. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw057. Print 2016 Apr. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016. PMID: 26957623 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Corrigendum to "Neoadjuvant 5-FU or Capecitabine Plus Radiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial".J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jul 1;110(7):794. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy096. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018. PMID: 29800481 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project R-04 was designed to determine whether the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine could be substituted for continuous infusion 5-FU in the curative setting of stage II/III rectal cancer during neoadjuvant radiation therapy and whether the addition of oxaliplatin could further enhance the activity of fluoropyrimidine-sensitized radiation.
Methods: Patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer undergoing preoperative radiation were randomly assigned to one of four chemotherapy regimens in a 2x2 design: CVI 5-FU or oral capecitabine with or without oxaliplatin. The primary endpoint was local-regional tumor control. Time-to-event endpoint distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: Among 1608 randomized patients there were no statistically significant differences between regimens using 5-FU vs capecitabine in three-year local-regional tumor event rates (11.2% vs 11.8%), 5-year DFS (66.4% vs 67.7%), or 5-year OS (79.9% vs 80.8%); or for oxaliplatin vs no oxaliplatin for the three endpoints of local-regional events, DFS, and OS (11.2% vs 12.1%, 69.2% vs 64.2%, and 81.3% vs 79.0%). The addition of oxaliplatin was associated with statistically significantly more overall and grade 3-4 diarrhea (P < .0001). Three-year rates of local-regional recurrence among patients who underwent R0 resection ranged from 3.1 to 5.1% depending on the study arm.
Conclusions: Continuous infusion 5-FU produced outcomes for local-regional control, DFS, and OS similar to those obtained with oral capecitabine combined with radiation. This study establishes capecitabine as a standard of care in the pre-operative rectal setting. Oxaliplatin did not improve the local-regional failure rate, DFS, or OS for any patient risk group but did add considerable toxicity.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
Comment in
-
Curing more colorectal cancer.Natl Med J India. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):155-157. Natl Med J India. 2016. PMID: 27808066 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1927-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.7753. Epub 2014 May 5. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24799484 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy endpoints of radiation therapy group protocol 0247: a randomized, phase 2 study of neoadjuvant radiation therapy plus concurrent capecitabine and irinotecan or capecitabine and oxaliplatin for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.031. Epub 2014 Nov 5. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015. PMID: 25446610 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Chronicle: results of a randomised phase III trial in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation randomising postoperative adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus control.Ann Oncol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1356-1362. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu147. Epub 2014 Apr 8. Ann Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24718885 Clinical Trial.
-
Radiotherapy and oral capecitabine in the preoperative treatment of patients with rectal cancer: rationale, preliminary results and perspectives.Tumori. 2003 Jul-Aug;89(4):361-7. doi: 10.1177/030089160308900403. Tumori. 2003. PMID: 14606636 Review.
-
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin and capecitabine for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(41):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-185. doi: 10.3310/hta10410. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 17049138 Review.
Cited by
-
Phase II study of long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer in Japan: ENSEMBLE-2.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Aug 3;8(6):1067-1075. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12848. eCollection 2024 Nov. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024. PMID: 39502728 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative short-course radiation therapy with PROtons compared to photons in high-risk RECTal cancer (PRORECT): Initial dosimetric experience.Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Dec 17;39:100562. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100562. eCollection 2023 Mar. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36582423 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Outcome in a Phase II Study of Regional Hyperthermia Added to Preoperative Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Adenocarcinomas.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;14(3):705. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030705. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35158972 Free PMC article.
-
Debating Pros and Cons of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 18;13(24):6361. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246361. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34944980 Free PMC article.
-
Addition of Platinum Derivatives to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Stage II/III Rectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):887-902. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz081. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019. PMID: 31077329 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64 (5):9–29. - PubMed
-
- O’Connell MJ, Martenson JA, Wieand HS, et al. Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protracted-infusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. N Engl J Med. 1994;331 (8):502–507. - PubMed
-
- Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J, et al. Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19 (21):4097–4106. - PubMed
-
- Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, et al. Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19 (8):2282–2292. - PubMed
-
- Glen H, Cassidy J. Redefining adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer: X-ACT trial. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008;8 (4):547–551. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources