Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid As Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: Final Results of the NO16968 Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial
- PMID: 26324362
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.9107
Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid As Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: Final Results of the NO16968 Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial
Abstract
Purpose: To report the final efficacy findings and biomarker analysis from the NO16968 trial comparing bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in resected stage III colon cancer.
Patients and methods: After curative resection, patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX, as oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, or bolus FU/FA, as the Mayo Clinic or Roswell Park regimens, for 6 months. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS).
Results: The intention-to-treat population comprised 1,886 patients (XELOX, n = 944; FU/FA, n = 942). Seven-year DFS rates were 63% and 56% in the XELOX and FU/FA groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93; P = .004). Seven-year OS rates were 73% and 67% in the XELOX and FU/FA groups, respectively (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.99; P = .04). A total of 68% and 77% of patients who experienced relapse or a new colorectal cancer in the XELOX and FU/FA groups, respectively, received drug treatment for metastatic disease. Four hundred ninety-eight patients consented to the biomarker analysis: 242 in the XELOX group and 256 in the FU/FA group. Low tumor expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase may be predictive for XELOX efficacy; in the XELOX group, for high versus low dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression levels, DFS HR was 2.45 (95% CI, 1.55 to 3.86; P < .001), and OS HR was 2.75 (95% CI, 1.65 to 4.59; P < .001). In the FU/FA group, no statistically significant associations were observed between any tumor biomarker and outcomes.
Conclusion: XELOX improved OS compared with bolus FU/FA in patients with resected stage III colon cancer after a median follow-up of almost 7 years. XELOX should be considered a standard adjuvant treatment option in patients with stage III disease. Tumoral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression is a promising predictive, and potentially, highly clinically relevant, biomarker for XELOX efficacy requiring further prospective evaluation.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00069121.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Similar articles
-
Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 10;29(11):1465-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.6297. Epub 2011 Mar 7. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21383294 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase III trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: a planned safety analysis in 1,864 patients.J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 1;25(1):102-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1075. J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17194911 Clinical Trial.
-
Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer (AVANT): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.Lancet Oncol. 2012 Dec;13(12):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70509-0. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Lancet Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23168362 Clinical Trial.
-
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin and capecitabine for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(41):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-185. doi: 10.3310/hta10410. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 17049138 Review.
-
Can capecitabine replace 5-FU/leucovorin in combination with oxaliplatin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer?Oncology (Williston Park). 2002 Dec;16(12 Suppl No 14):23-6. Oncology (Williston Park). 2002. PMID: 12520636 Review.
Cited by
-
Chinese Medicine Combined with Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Improving Myelosuppression in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Chin J Integr Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):643-652. doi: 10.1007/s11655-023-3558-7. Epub 2024 Jan 12. Chin J Integr Med. 2024. PMID: 38212495 Review.
-
Prognostic Value of Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Levels for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Study.J Anus Rectum Colon. 2022 Oct 27;6(4):249-258. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2022-020. eCollection 2022. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2022. PMID: 36348948 Free PMC article.
-
The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase-Related Indicators in Clinical Outcomes of Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Jan;26(1):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-00563-3. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Pathol Oncol Res. 2020. PMID: 30519982
-
Expressions of 10 genes as candidate predictors of recurrence in stage III colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.Oncol Lett. 2019 Aug;18(2):1388-1394. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10437. Epub 2019 Jun 5. Oncol Lett. 2019. PMID: 31423202 Free PMC article.
-
Multicenter, phase II clinical trial of peptide vaccination with oral chemotherapy following curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer.Oncol Lett. 2018 Apr;15(4):4241-4247. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7905. Epub 2018 Jan 29. Oncol Lett. 2018. PMID: 29541190 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials