Association of Bystander Interventions With Neurologically Intact Survival Among Patients With Bystander-Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Japan
- PMID: 26197185
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.8068
Association of Bystander Interventions With Neurologically Intact Survival Among Patients With Bystander-Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Japan
Abstract
Importance: Neurologically intact survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been increasing in Japan. However, associations between increased prehospital care, including bystander interventions and increases in survival, have not been well estimated.
Objective: To estimate the associations between bystander interventions and changes in neurologically intact survival among patients with OHCA in Japan.
Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective descriptive study using data from Japan's nationwide OHCA registry, which started in January 2005. The registry includes all patients with OHCA transported to the hospital by emergency medical services (EMS) and recorded patients' characteristics, prehospital interventions, and outcomes. Participants were 167,912 patients with bystander-witnessed OHCA of presumed cardiac origin in the registry between January 2005 and December 2012.
Exposures: Prehospital interventions by bystander, including defibrillation using public-access automated external defibrillators and chest compression.
Main outcomes and measures: Neurologically intact survival was defined as Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category score 1 or 2 and overall performance category scores 1 or 2 at 1 month or at discharge. The association between the interventions and neurologically intact survival was evaluated.
Results: From 2005 to 2012, the number of bystander-witnessed OHCAs of presumed cardiac origin increased from 17,882 (14.0 per 100,000 persons [95% CI, 13.8-14.2]) to 23,797 (18.7 per 100,000 persons [95% CI, 18.4-18.9]), and neurologically intact survival increased from 587 cases (age-adjusted proportion, 3.3% [95% CI, 3.0%-3.5%]) to 1710 cases (8.2% [95% CI, 7.8%-8.6%]). The rates of bystander chest compression increased from 38.6% to 50.9%, bystander-only defibrillation increased from 0.1% to 2.3%, bystander defibrillation combined with EMS defibrillation increased from 0.1% to 1.4%, and EMS-only defibrillation decreased from 26.6% to 23.5%. Performance of bystander chest compression, compared with no bystander chest compression, was associated with increased neurologically intact survival (8.4% [6594 survivors/78,592 cases] vs 4.1% [3595 survivors/88,720 cases]; odds ratio [OR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.45-1.60]). Compared with EMS-only defibrillation (15.0% [6445 survivors/42,916 cases]), bystander-only defibrillation (40.7% [931 survivors/2287 cases]) was associated with increased neurologically intact survival (OR, 2.24 [95% CI, 1.93-2.61]), as was combined bystander and EMS defibrillation (30.5% [444 survivors/1456 cases]; OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.31-1.71]), whereas no defibrillation (2.0% [2369 survivors/120,653 cases]) was associated with reduced survival (OR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.39-0.48]).
Conclusions and relevance: In Japan, between 2005 and 2012, the rates of bystander chest compression and bystander defibrillation increased and were associated with increased odds of neurologically intact survival.
Comment in
-
Bystander Interventions Can Improve Outcomes From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):231-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7519. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26197181 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Relationship Between Emergency Medical Services Response Time and Bystander Intervention in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 27;7(9):e007568. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007568. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29703811 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Bystander and First-Responder Intervention With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in North Carolina, 2010-2013.JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):255-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7938. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26197186
-
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance --- Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005--December 31, 2010.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 Jul 29;60(8):1-19. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011. PMID: 21796098
-
Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):63-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010. PMID: 20123673 Review.
-
When is a Cardiac Arrest Non-Cardiac?Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Oct;32(5):523-527. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006446. Epub 2017 May 2. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017. PMID: 28463098 Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparison between Conventional and Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 21;10(3):591. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030591. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35327068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Smartphone Application to Reduce the Time to Automated External Defibrillator Delivery After a Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Simulation-Based Study.Simul Healthc. 2018 Dec;13(6):387-393. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000305. Simul Healthc. 2018. PMID: 29659413 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Relationship Between Emergency Medical Services Response Time and Bystander Intervention in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 27;7(9):e007568. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007568. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29703811 Free PMC article.
-
Prehospital predicting factors using a decision tree model for patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and an initial shockable rhythm.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43106-w. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37758799 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of real-time visual feedback device 'Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (QCPR) Classroom' with a metronome sound on layperson CPR training in Japan: a cluster randomized control trial.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 11;9(6):e026140. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026140. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31189674 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical