Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jul-Aug;96(7-8):757-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

Epistaxis: The role of arterial embolization

A Reyre  1 , J Michel  2 , L Santini  2 , P Dessi  2 , V Vidal  3 , J-M Bartoli  3 , G Moulin  3 , A Varoquaux  3
Affiliations
Free article
Review

Epistaxis: The role of arterial embolization

A Reyre et al. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015 Jul-Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Epistaxis is defined as flow of blood from the nasal fossae and is a common and benign disorder in the great majority of cases which does not require medical care. It may however become a genuine medical or surgical emergency because of the amount, repeated episodes or patient's medical vulnerability (such as coronary artery disease patients). Epistaxis may be either primary or a symptom of an underlying disease. Four levels of problems need to be answered faced with epistaxis: recognizing it, and in particular not missing "epistaxis" due to swallowed blood or venous hemorrhage, which falls outside of the scope of interventional radiology; establishing the amount and its repercussions, particularly as a decompensating factor in another disease; investigating its cause and in particular never missing a tumor (male adolescents); obtaining hemostasis. Epistaxis varies not only in type and cause but must be considered in its clinical context. Arterial embolization is a treatment of choice for severe refractory epistaxis and some hemorrhages. When carried out by trained operators, it is an effective method with few risks of complications and is increasingly being used in reference centers (Brinjikji et al.). It remains, however, a method which is less widely used than surgery, particularly in the United States where in a series of 69,410 patients treated over the last 10 years for refractory epistaxis, 92.6% underwent surgical ligation, 6.4% embolization and 1% combined treatments (Brinjikji et al.). Epistaxis is occasionally catastrophic and requires extremely urgent management. In each case, close collaboration with the surgeon, the presence of an intensive care anesthetist and at least sedation are all factors which improve management and therefore the results of embolization. All patients and/or their friends/close family should have given "reliable, clear and appropriate" information.

Keywords: Arteriography; CT angiography; Embolization; Epistaxis; Internal maxillary and sphenopalatine artery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources