Impact of Contraceptive Education on Contraceptive Knowledge and Decision Making: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 26190846
- PMCID: PMC4532374
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.031
Impact of Contraceptive Education on Contraceptive Knowledge and Decision Making: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Context: Educational interventions can help increase knowledge of available contraceptive methods, enabling individuals to make informed decisions and use contraception more effectively. This systematic review evaluated contraceptive education interventions to guide national recommendations on quality family planning services.
Evidence acquisition: Three databases (CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO) were searched from 1985 through 2012 for peer-reviewed articles on educational interventions, with supplemental searches conducted through 2015. Primary outcomes were knowledge, participation in and comfort with decision making, and attitudes toward contraception. Secondary outcomes included contraceptive use behaviors and unintended pregnancy.
Evidence synthesis: Database searches in 2011 identified 5,830 articles; 17 met inclusion criteria and were abstracted into evidence tables. Searches in 2012 and 2015 identified four additional studies. Studies used a wide range of tools (decision aids, written materials, audio/videotapes, and interactive games), with and without input from a healthcare provider or educator. Of 15 studies that examined the impact of educational interventions on knowledge, 14 found significant improvement using a range of tools, with and without input from a healthcare provider or educator. Fewer studies evaluated outcomes related to decision making, attitudes toward contraception, contraceptive use behaviors, or unintended pregnancy.
Conclusions: Results from this systematic review are consistent with evidence from the broader healthcare field suggesting that a range of educational interventions can increase knowledge. Future studies should assess what aspects of educational interventions are most effective, the extent to which it is necessary to include a healthcare provider or educator, and the extent to which educational interventions can impact behaviors.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact of Contraceptive Education on Knowledge and Decision Making: An Updated Systematic Review.Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):703-715. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.012. Am J Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 30342633 Free PMC article.
-
An interactive website for informed contraception choice: randomised evaluation of Contraception Choices.Digit Health. 2020 Jun 26;6:2055207620936435. doi: 10.1177/2055207620936435. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2020. PMID: 32704380 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26629725 English, French.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda.Contraception. 2003 Feb;67(2):115-32. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00472-9. Contraception. 2003. PMID: 12586322 Review.
Cited by
-
Bridging the Gap Between Family Medicine and Adolescents: Creating Opportunities Through Sex Education.Cureus. 2022 Nov 14;14(11):e31472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31472. eCollection 2022 Nov. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36532900 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-Conceptional and Antenatal Care for Improved Newborn and Child Survival in India: A Review.Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;90(Suppl 1):10-19. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04841-0. Epub 2023 Sep 13. Indian J Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37700121 Review.
-
United States Government-Supported Family Planning and Reproductive Health Outreach in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Lessons Learned and Recommendations.Open Access J Contracept. 2024 Mar 5;15:13-21. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S446263. eCollection 2024. Open Access J Contracept. 2024. PMID: 38476860 Free PMC article.
-
Bridging disparity in knowledge and utilization of contraceptive methods among married couples in the pastoralist community of Fentale District, Eastern Ethiopia.PLoS One. 2024 Nov 11;19(11):e0309703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309703. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39527571 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with modern contraceptive utilization among reproductive age women in Cambodia; evidenced by the recent Cambodia demographic and health survey.Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Oct 16;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00315-6. Contracept Reprod Med. 2024. PMID: 39415275 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Vital Health Stat. 2010;23(29):1–44. - PubMed
-
- Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011;84(5):478–485. http://dx.doi.org/1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gold RB, Sonfield A, Richards CL, Frost JJ. Next Steps for America’s Family Planning Program: Leveraging the Potential of Medicaid and Title X in an Evolving Health Care System. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2009.
-
- Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women’s knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1417–1422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Grady WR, Klepinger DH, Nelson-Wally A. Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999;31(4):168–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2991589. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous