Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 26;17(5):e128.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.3863.

Disease detection or public opinion reflection? Content analysis of tweets, other social media, and online newspapers during the measles outbreak in The Netherlands in 2013

Affiliations

Disease detection or public opinion reflection? Content analysis of tweets, other social media, and online newspapers during the measles outbreak in The Netherlands in 2013

Liesbeth Mollema et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: In May 2013, a measles outbreak began in the Netherlands among Orthodox Protestants who often refuse vaccination for religious reasons.

Objective: Our aim was to compare the number of messages expressed on Twitter and other social media during the measles outbreak with the number of online news articles and the number of reported measles cases to answer the question if and when social media reflect public opinion patterns versus disease patterns.

Methods: We analyzed measles-related tweets, other social media messages, and online newspaper articles over a 7-month period (April 15 to November 11, 2013) with regard to topic and sentiment. Thematic analysis was used to structure and analyze the topics.

Results: There was a stronger correlation between the weekly number of social media messages and the weekly number of online news articles (P<.001 for both tweets and other social media messages) than between the weekly number of social media messages and the weekly number of reported measles cases (P=.003 and P=.048 for tweets and other social media messages, respectively), especially after the summer break. All data sources showed 3 large peaks, possibly triggered by announcements about the measles outbreak by the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment and statements made by well-known politicians. Most messages informed the public about the measles outbreak (ie, about the number of measles cases) (93/165, 56.4%) followed by messages about preventive measures taken to control the measles spread (47/132, 35.6%). The leading opinion expressed was frustration regarding people who do not vaccinate because of religious reasons (42/88, 48%).

Conclusions: The monitoring of online (social) media might be useful for improving communication policies aiming to preserve vaccination acceptability among the general public. Data extracted from online (social) media provide insight into the opinions that are at a certain moment salient among the public, which enables public health institutes to respond immediately and appropriately to those public concerns. More research is required to develop an automatic coding system that captures content and user's characteristics that are most relevant to the diseases within the National Immunization Program and related public health events and can inform official responses.

Keywords: Internet; Netherlands; Web 2.0; infectious disease outbreak; measles; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of relative proportions of weekly tweets, other social media messages, and online newspaper articles to measles cases from April 15 to November 11, 2013. Graph is scaled to the highest peak at week 28 for all 4 data sources (peak assigned a score of 100).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Knol MJ, Urbanus AT, Swart EM, Mollema L, Ruijs W, van Binnendijk RS, TeWierik MJ, de Melker HE, Timen A, Hahne SJ. Large ongoing measles outbreak in a religious community in the Netherlands since May 2013. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(36):pii=20580. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20580 - PubMed
    1. Van Lier A, Oomen P, Conyn-van Spaendonck MA, Drijfhout IH, de Hoogh PA, de Melker HE. Vaccination coverage of the National Immunisation Programme in the Netherlands; year of report 2013 [in Dutch] Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2014. [2015-01-16]. 6VcuxY8pG http://www.rivm.nl/en/Documents_and_publications/Scientific/Reports/2013....
    1. Ruijs WLM, Hautvast JLA, van der Velden K, de Vos S, Knippenberg H, Hulscher MEJL. Religious subgroups influencing vaccination coverage in the Dutch Bible belt: an ecological study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-102. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woonink F. Objections against vaccination: the perspective of those who refuse. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2009. [2015-01-16]. 6Yoc4g0FP http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=rivmp:55451&type=org&disposition=....
    1. Harmsen IA, Ruiter RAC, Paulussen TGW, Mollema L, Kok G, de Melker HE. Factors that influence vaccination decision-making by parents who visit an anthroposophical child welfare center: a focus group study. Adv Prev Med. 2012;2012:175694. doi: 10.1155/2012/175694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/175694 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed