Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;36(7):769-81.
doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgv061. Epub 2015 May 4.

Dimethyl fumarate and the oleanane triterpenoids, CDDO-imidazolide and CDDO-methyl ester, both activate the Nrf2 pathway but have opposite effects in the A/J model of lung carcinogenesis

Affiliations

Dimethyl fumarate and the oleanane triterpenoids, CDDO-imidazolide and CDDO-methyl ester, both activate the Nrf2 pathway but have opposite effects in the A/J model of lung carcinogenesis

Ciric To et al. Carcinogenesis. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Lung cancer accounts for the highest number of cancer-related deaths in the USA, highlighting the need for better prevention and therapy. Activation of the Nrf2 pathway detoxifies harmful insults and reduces oxidative stress, thus preventing carcinogenesis in various preclinical models. However, constitutive activation of the Nrf2 pathway has been detected in numerous cancers, which confers a survival advantage to tumor cells and a poor prognosis. In our study, we compared the effects of two clinically relevant classes of Nrf2 activators, dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and the synthetic oleanane triterpenoids, CDDO-imidazolide (CDDO-Im) and CDDO-methyl ester (CDDO-Me) in RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage-like cells, in VC1 lung cancer cells and in the A/J model of lung cancer. Although the triterpenoids and DMF both activated the Nrf2 pathway, CDDO-Im and CDDO-Me were markedly more potent than DMF. All of these drugs reduced the production of reactive oxygen species and inhibited nitric oxide production in RAW264.7 cells, but the triterpenoids were 100 times more potent than DMF in these assays. Microarray analysis revealed that only 52 of 99 Nrf2-target genes were induced by all three compounds, and each drug regulated a unique subset of Nrf2 genes. These drugs also altered the expression of other genes important in lung cancer independent of Nrf2. Although all three compounds enhanced the phosphorylation of CREB, only DMF increased the phosphorylation of Akt. CDDO-Me, at either 12.5 or 50mg/kg of diet, was the most effective drug in our lung cancer mouse model. Specifically, CDDO-Me significantly reduced the average tumor number, size and burden compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, 52% of the tumors in the control group were high-grade tumors compared with only 14% in the CDDO-Me group. Though less potent, CDDO-Im had similar activity as CDDO-Me. In contrast, 61-63% of the tumors in the DMF groups (400-1200mg/kg diet) were high-grade tumors compared with 52% for the controls (P < 0.05). Additionally, DMF significantly increased the average number of tumors compared with the controls (P < 0.05). Thus, in contrast to the triterpenoids, which effectively reduced pathogenesis in A/J mice, DMF enhanced the severity of lung carcinogenesis in these mice. Collectively, these results suggest that although CDDO-Im, CDDO-Me and DMF all activate the Nrf2 pathway, they target distinct genes and signaling pathways, resulting in opposite effects for the prevention of experimental lung cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CDDO-Im (Im), CDDO-Me (Me) and DMF induce NQO1 and HO-1 gene expression and inhibit NO and ROS production in RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells were treated with DMSO or various concentrations of Im, Me or DMF. In (A), cells were lysed after 6h and RNA was extracted to measure NQO1 (left panel) and HO-1 (right panel) mRNA induction by qPCR; *P < 0.05 versus DMSO; #P < 0.05 versus 0.05 μM Im or 0.1 μM Im. In (B), cells were treated with drugs and stimulated with 10ng/ml of IFNγ (left panel) or 3ng/ml of LPS (right panel) for 24h before the NO level in media was measured by the Griess reaction; *P < 0.05 versus IFNγ or LPS-stimulated control. In (C), cells were treated with compounds for 24h, incubated with 10 μM of 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate for 30min, and then challenged with 250 μM of tBHP for 15min. Cells were harvested and fluorescence of ROS-positive cells was measured by flow cytometry. *P < 0.05 versus tBHP-stimulated controls.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Triterpenoids and DMF stabilize Nrf2 proteins and induce NQO1 and HO-1 protein expression in vitro. VC1 lung cancer cells were treated with DMSO or various concentrations of CDDO-Im (Im), CDDO-Me (Me) or DMF for 0–8h (A) or for 0–24h (B) before cells were lysed and processed by western blotting; MG132 is a proteasome inhibitor used as a positive control.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
CDDO-Im (Im), CDDO-Me (Me) and DMF activate overlapping but non-identical subsets of Nrf2 genes. VC1 cells were treated in triplicates with DMSO, 0.05 μM of CDDO-Im, 0.1 μM of CDDO-Me or 15 μM of DMF for 6h before RNA was extracted and processed for microarray analysis. Expression patterns of Nrf2 genes (A) and non-Nrf2 genes (B) that were detected in the microarray were confirmed by qPCR. *P < 0.05 versus DMSO. (C) Venn diagram depicting the subsets of Nrf2 genes that were targeted by the compounds. (D) Heat map showing the Nrf2 genes that were significantly up-regulated (yellow) or down-regulated (blue) by 1.5-fold or 0.75-fold, respectively by drug treatment compared with control (DMSO) in the microarray. The fold change of Hmox1 was the greatest of all the genes examined (red box).WT Nrf2 mouse embryonic fibroblasts and Nrf2 KO mouse embryonic fibroblasts were treated with DMSO or various concentrations of Im, Me or DMF for 24h (E) or 8h (F) before cells were lysed and processed for western blotting.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Triterpenoids and DMF regulate non-Nrf2-target genes that are involved in biological processes related to cancer progression. VC1 cells were treated with DMSO or various concentrations of CDDO-Im (Im), CDDO-Me (Me) or DMF for 8h (A) or 2h (B) before cells were lysed and processed by western blotting. (C) Venn diagram showing the subsets of genes that were significantly up-regulated by 1.5-fold (left panel) or down-regulated by 0.75-fold (right panel) in the presence of drugs (P < 0.01). (D) Gene Ontology analysis of the number of genes that were targeted by the compounds in eight major biological processes involved in carcinogenesis with respective P values.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Triterpenoids and DMF both induce NQO1 and HO-1 mRNA expression in vivo but have opposing effects in the severity of lung cancer in A/J mice. Mice (n = 5–6 per group) were injected i. p. (A) with vehicle, 12.5mg/kg of CDDO-Im (Im) and CDDO-Me (Me) or 100mg/kg of DMF or gavaged with 12.5mg/kg of Me and/or injected i. p. with 200mg/kg of DMF (B). Four hours later, tissues were harvested, and RNA from lungs and liver were extracted to assess NQO1 (left panel) and HO-1 (right panel) (A) or NQO1 and AKR1B8 (B) mRNA induction by qPCR. *P < 0.05 versus control. (C) Representative images of the lungs of mice fed with control, 50mg/kg of CDDO-Im, 50mg/kg of CDDO-Me or 1200mg/kg of DMF in diet for 15 weeks (magnification, 40×). Histopathology of tumors from control (insets a–c), CDDO-Im (inset d), CDDO-Me (inset e) and DMF (insets f–j) are shown (magnification, 200×).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R., et al. (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin., 64, 9–29. - PubMed
    1. Jaramillo M.C., et al. (2013) The emerging role of the Nrf2-Keap1 signaling pathway in cancer. Genes Dev., 27, 2179–2191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kensler T.W., et al. (2010) Nrf2: friend or foe for chemoprevention? Carcinogenesis, 31, 90–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suzuki T., et al. (2013) Toward clinical application of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 34, 340–346. - PubMed
    1. Hayes J.D., et al. (2010) Cancer chemoprevention mechanisms mediated through the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Antioxid. Redox Signal., 13, 1713–1748. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data