Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;197(11):1893-905.
doi: 10.1128/JB.02607-14. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

Inducible Expression of a Resistance-Nodulation-Division-Type Efflux Pump in Staphylococcus aureus Provides Resistance to Linoleic and Arachidonic Acids

Affiliations

Inducible Expression of a Resistance-Nodulation-Division-Type Efflux Pump in Staphylococcus aureus Provides Resistance to Linoleic and Arachidonic Acids

Heba Alnaseri et al. J Bacteriol. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Although Staphylococcus aureus is exposed to antimicrobial fatty acids on the skin, in nasal secretions, and in abscesses, a specific mechanism of inducible resistance to this important facet of innate immunity has not been identified. Here, we have sequenced the genome of S. aureus USA300 variants selected for their ability to grow at an elevated concentration of linoleic acid. The fatty acid-resistant clone FAR7 had a single nucleotide polymorphism resulting in an H₁₂₁Y substitution in an uncharacterized transcriptional regulator belonging to the AcrR family, which was divergently transcribed from a gene encoding a member of the resistance-nodulation-division superfamily of multidrug efflux pumps. We named these genes farR and farE, for regulator and effector of fatty acid resistance, respectively. Several lines of evidence indicated that FarE promotes efflux of antimicrobial fatty acids and is regulated by FarR. First, expression of farE was strongly induced by arachidonic and linoleic acids in an farR-dependent manner. Second, an H₁₂₁Y substitution in FarR resulted in increased expression of farE and was alone sufficient to promote increased resistance of S. aureus to linoleic acid. Third, inactivation of farE resulted in a significant reduction in the inducible resistance of S. aureus to the bactericidal activity of 100 μM linoleic acid, increased accumulation of [(14)C]linoleic acid by growing cells, and severely impaired growth in the presence of nonbactericidal concentrations of linoleic acid. Cumulatively, these findings represent the first description of a specific mechanism of inducible resistance to antimicrobial fatty acids in a Gram-positive pathogen.

Importance: Staphylococcus aureus colonizes approximately 25% of humans and is a leading cause of human infectious morbidity and mortality. To persist on human hosts, S. aureus must have intrinsic defense mechanisms to cope with antimicrobial fatty acids, which comprise an important component of human innate defense mechanisms. We have identified a novel pair of genes, farR and farE, that constitute a dedicated regulator and effector of S. aureus resistance to linoleic and arachidonic acids, which are major fatty acids in human membrane phospholipid. Expression of farE, which encodes an efflux pump, is induced in an farR-dependent mechanism, in response to these antimicrobial fatty acids that would be encountered in a tissue abscess.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Linoleic acid induces expression of farE. Growth (OD600; open symbols) and relative luminescence units (RLU/OD; closed symbols) of USA300 and USA300 farR::ΦNE, harboring the pGYfarE::lux reporter vector, are charted. USA300 was grown in TSB or in TSB–20 μM linoleic acid (LA); USA300 farR::ΦNE was grown in TSB or in TSB–20 μM linoleic acid. Each value represents the mean and standard deviation of results of three separate cultures, and each culture was subjected to quadruplicate luminescence readings at each time point.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Sensitivity of USA300 and USA300 farR::ΦNE to the bactericidal activity of 100 μM linoleic acid (LA). (A) USA300 or USA300 farR::ΦNE challenge cells were grown to mid-exponential phase in TSB or in TSB–20 μM linoleic acid and then diluted to 106 CFU/ml in TSB containing 100 μM linoleic acid. Viability was monitored at hourly intervals. (B) USA300 farR::ΦNE was complemented with empty pLI50 vector or pLIfarR and assayed for viability in 100 μM linoleic acid after initial growth in TSB–20 μM linoleic acid. All data points represent the means ± standard deviations of viability determinations from quadruplicate cultures. Significant differences in viability at each time point were determined by an unpaired one-tailed Student's t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Mutation of farE::ΦNE enhances sensitivity of S. aureus to toxicity of linoleic acid. Growth of USA300 (A) or USA300 farE::ΦNE (B) in TSB supplemented with 5 μM, 10 μM, 20 μM, or 25 μM linoleic acid and that of USA300 farE::ΦNE(pLIfarE) in TSB–25 μM linoleic acid were measured. (C) Growth of USA300 or USA300 farE::ΦNE in TSB–50 μM linoleic acid and growth of USA300 farE::ΦNE(pLIfarE) in 50 μM or 100 μM linoleic acid. (D) Growth of S. aureus SH1000 or SH1000 farE::ΦNE in TSB–50 μM linoleic acid. Each data point represents the mean value of triplicate (A, C, and D) or quadruplicate (B) cultures.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Sensitivity of USA300 and USA300 farE::ΦNE cells to the bactericidal activity of 100 μM linoleic acid. Cells of USA300 or USA300 farE::ΦNE were exposed to 100 μM linoleic acid after growth to mid-exponential phase in TSB or in TSB–20 μM linoleic acid. Each data point represents the mean value of quadruplicate cultures. P values are indicated by asterisks (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant).
FIG 5
FIG 5
The FAR7 SNP causes enhanced induction of farE expression. The cultures were grown in TSB or TSB–20 μM linoleic acid (LA) as indicated. Data are expressed as relative luminosity units (RLU), standardized to one OD600 unit. Values represent the means of four replicates from each of four independent cultures. Measurements were taken from triplicate cultures when OD600 values reached approximately 0.5, and P values are indicated by asterisks (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
FIG 6
FIG 6
FAR7 is more resistant than USA300 to linoleic acid. (A) Growth analysis of USA300 and FAR7 cultured in TSB or in TSB–100 μM linoleic acid. (B) Bactericidal activity of 100 μM linoleic acid measured with USA300 or FAR7 challenge cells, prepared by growth to mid-exponential phase in TSB or in TSB–100 μM linoleic acid. Each data point represents the mean value of triplicate cultures. P values for comparison of induced USA300 and induced FAR7 cells are indicated by asterisks (***, P < 0.001).
FIG 7
FIG 7
The variant farR7 allele, but not wild-type farR, enables USA300 farR::ΦNE to grow at inhibitory concentrations of linoleic acid. USA300 was grown in TSB–25 μM linoleic acid, USA300 farR::ΦNE was grown in 25 μM or 50 μM LA, USA300 farR::ΦNE(pLIfarR) was grown in 50 μM linoleic acid, and USA300 farR::ΦNE(pLIfarR7) was grown in 50 μM or 100 μM linoleic acid. All data points represent the mean values of triplicate cultures.
FIG 8
FIG 8
Influence of different antimicrobial fatty acids on induction of farE or viability of S. aureus USA300 and USA 300 farE::ΦNE. (A) Quantification of pGYfarE::lux-dependent luciferase activity in S. aureus USA300 grown to an OD600 of 0.5 in TSB alone or in TSB supplemented with 20 μM fatty acid, as indicated. Each value represents the mean of quadruplicate measurements from each of four replicate cultures. P values indicate significant differences compared to growth in TSB alone or a significant difference between growth with linoleic and arachidonic acids. (B) Bactericidal activity of 100 μM linoleic acid (C18:2), arachidonic acid (C20:4), or palmitoleic acid (C16:1) toward USA300 or USA300 farE::ΦNE cells. The inoculum cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.5 in TSB supplemented with 20 μM concentrations of the respective fatty acids prior to challenge with a 100 μM bactericidal concentration. Asterisks indicate P values of significant differences between values for USA300 and USA300 farE::ΦNE. Each value represents the mean viability determination from quadruplicate cultures. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.
FIG 9
FIG 9
Effect of farE::ΦNE and Δtet38 mutations on growth of S. aureus in the presence of 25 μM or 40 μM palmitoleic acid (PA). USA300, USA300 farE::ΦNE, USA300 Δtet38, and USA300 Δtet38-farE::ΦNE were grown in TSB supplemented with 25 μM or 40 μM palmitoleic acid (PA), as indicated. The dotted line with the arrow depicts the time of growth at which the OD600 reached 0.5.
FIG 10
FIG 10
Growth (A) and uptake of [14C]linoleic acid (B) following exposure of S. aureus USA300 and USA300 farE::ΦNE to an increase in concentration of linoleic acid. In panel A, quadruplicate cultures of USA300, USA300 farE::ΦNE(pLI50), or USA300 farE::ΦNE(pLIfarE) were grown in TSB–20 μM linoleic acid to an OD600 of approximately 0.2 to 0.3. The cultures were then supplemented with an additional 50 μM dose of linoleic acid, and growth (OD600) was measured after 30 min and then at hourly intervals. When this experiment was conducted for the purpose of quantifying uptake of [14C]linoleic acid, the cultures were supplemented with 0.20 μCi/ml of [14C]linoleic acid ([14C]-LA) at the 30-min time point, and aliquots of culture were processed for quantification of [14C]linoleic acid uptake at intervals of 1, 2, 5, and 10 min. Each data point represents the mean and standard deviation of values of quadruplicate samples.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boucher H, Miller LG, Razonable RR. 2010. Serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 51(Suppl 2):S183–S197. doi:10.1086/653519. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kochanek KD, Xu J, Murphy SL, Minino AM, Kung HC. 2012. Deaths: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 60:1–117. - PubMed
    1. van Hal SJ, Jensen SO, Vaska VL, Espedido BA, Paterson DL, Gosbell IB. 2012. Predictors of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:362–386. doi:10.1128/CMR.05022-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeLeo FR, Diep BA, Otto M. 2009. Host defense and pathogenesis in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 23:17–34. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Archer GL. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus: a well-armed pathogen. Clin Infect Dis 26:1179–1181. doi:10.1086/520289. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources