Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:745163.
doi: 10.1155/2015/745163. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

Identifying the prevalence, trajectory, and determinants of psychological distress in extremity sarcoma

Affiliations

Identifying the prevalence, trajectory, and determinants of psychological distress in extremity sarcoma

Melissa H Tang et al. Sarcoma. 2015.

Abstract

Objective. Extremity sarcoma (ES) is a rare cancer that presents with unique challenges. This study was performed to identify the prevalence, trajectory, and determinants of distress and characterise sources of stress in this cohort. Methods. Consecutive patients with ES were prospectively recruited between May 2011 and December 2012. Questionnaires were administered during initial diagnosis and then six months and one year after surgery. Results. Distress was reported by about a third of our cohort and associated with poorer physical function, poorer quality of life, and pain. In addition to fears regarding mortality and life role changes, the most common sources of stress were centered on dissatisfaction with the healthcare system, such as frustrations with a lack of communication with the hospital regarding appointments and lack of education regarding management and outcomes. Conclusions. Psychological distress presents early in the cancer journey and persists up to one year after surgery. Distress is associated with negative outcomes. Active screening and effective interventions are necessary to improve outcomes. Sources of stress have been identified that may be amenable to targeted interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean DASS21 score with time
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of moderately to severely distressed participants according to timeframe (based on Table 2).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean TESS score with time (based on Table 2).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean pain score with time.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Summary of description of mean scores of EORTC QLQ C-30 (%) domains by presence of distress at 12 months.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grassi L., Indelli M., Marzola M., et al. Depressive symptoms and quality of life in home-care-assisted cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 1996;12(5):300–307. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00181-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacobsen P. B., Donovan K. A., Trask P. C., et al. Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer. 2005;103(7):1494–1502. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20940. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pinquart M., Duberstein P. R. Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2010;40(11):1797–1810. doi: 10.1017/s0033291709992285. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eiser C., Darlington A.-S. E., Stride C. B., Grimer R. Quality of life implications as a consequence of surgery: limb salvage, primary and secondary amputation. Sarcoma. 2001;5(4):189–196. doi: 10.1080/13577140120099173. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Refaat Y., Gunnoe J., Hornicek F. J., Mankin H. J. Comparison of quality of life after amputation or limb salvage. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;(397):298–305. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources