Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 3;10(3):e0116731.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116731. eCollection 2015.

Personal networks and mortality risk in older adults: a twenty-year longitudinal study

Affiliations

Personal networks and mortality risk in older adults: a twenty-year longitudinal study

Lea Ellwardt et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Research on aging has consistently demonstrated an increased chance of survival for older adults who are integrated into rich networks of social relationships. Theoretical explanations state that personal networks offer indirect psychosocial and direct physiological pathways. We investigate whether effects on and pathways to mortality risk differ between functional and structural characteristics of the personal network. The objective is to inquire which personal network characteristics are the best predictors of mortality risk after adjustment for mental, cognitive and physical health.

Methods and findings: Empirical tests were carried out by combining official register information on mortality with data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). The sample included 2,911 Dutch respondents aged 54 to 85 at baseline in 1992 and six follow-ups covering a time span of twenty years. Four functional characteristics (emotional and social loneliness, emotional and instrumental support) and four structural characteristics (living arrangement, contact frequency, number of contacts, number of social roles) of the personal network as well as mental, cognitive and physical health were assessed at all LASA follow-ups. Statistical analyses comprised of Cox proportional hazard regression models. Findings suggest differential effects of personal network characteristics on survival, with only small gender differences. Mortality risk was initially reduced by functional characteristics, but disappeared after full adjustment for the various health variables. Mortality risk was lowest for older adults embedded in large (HR = 0.986, 95% CI 0.979-0.994) and diverse networks (HR = 0.948, 95% CI 0.917-0.981), and this effect continued to show in the fully adjusted models.

Conclusions: Functional characteristics (i.e. emotional and social loneliness) are indirectly associated with a reduction in mortality risk, while structural characteristics (i.e. number of contacts and number of social roles) have direct protective effects. More research is needed to understand the causal mechanisms underlying these relations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Survivor functions compared for upper and lower quartiles of network structure (N ind = 2,911).
Note. Based on predictions from the fully adjusted Cox regression models (Models 6). For network size, the lower quartile (25th percentile) included 8 contacts, while the higher quartile (75th percentile) included 19 contacts. For network diversity, the lower quartile included 3 social roles, while the higher quartile included 6 social roles.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Death hazard ratios for women (N ind = 1,498) and men (N ind = 1,413), compared for age-adjusted and adjusted models.
Note. Hazard ratios are shown on a logarithmic scale. Age-adjusted coefficients represent bivariate associations from Models 1. Adjusted coefficients represent multivariate associations from Models 6. Hazard ratios may not be compared across the different variables (as ranges are unequal), but only between age-adjusted and adjusted coefficients, and between men and women.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berkman L, Syme S (1979) Social networks, host-resistance, and mortality – 9-year follow-up-study of Alameda county residents. Am J Epidemiol 109(2): 186–204. - PubMed
    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB (2010) Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. Plos Medicine 7(7): e1000316 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rizzuto D, Orsini N, Qiu C, Wang H, Fratiglioni L (2012) Lifestyle, social factors, and survival after age 75: Population based study. Br Med J 345: e5568 10.1136/bmj.e5568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Uchino B, Smith T, Olson-Cerny C, Nealey-Moore J (2003) Social relationships and ambulatory blood pressure: Structural and qualitative predictors of cardiovascular function during everyday social interactions. Health Psychology 22(4): 388–397. - PubMed
    1. Barefoot J, Gronbaek M, Jensen G, Schnohr P, Prescott E (2005) Social network diversity and risks of ischemic heart disease and total mortality: Findings from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 161(10): 960–967. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This research is financed by Healthy Aging, Population and Society (HAPS), an investment of the University of Groningen strategic research focus Healthy Aging. The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam is largely supported by a grant from the Netherlands Ministry of Health Welfare and Sports, Directorate of Long-Term Care. No funding bodies had any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.