Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 31;112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S50-6.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.42.

The role of primary care in cancer diagnosis via emergency presentation: qualitative synthesis of significant event reports

Affiliations

The role of primary care in cancer diagnosis via emergency presentation: qualitative synthesis of significant event reports

E D Mitchell et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Patients diagnosed with cancer in the context of an emergency presentation (EP) have poorer outcomes. It is often assumed that such patients present to the emergency department without consulting their general practitioner (GP). Little work has been done to identify primary care involvement before hospital attendance.

Methods: Participating primary care practices completed a significant event audit (SEA) report for the last patient diagnosed with cancer as a result of an EP. Accounts were synthesised and a qualitative approach to analysis undertaken.

Results: SEAs for 222 patients were analysed. A range of cancers were included, the most common being lung (32.4%) and upper gastrointestinal (19.8%). In most cases, patients had contact with their practice before diagnosis, primarily in the period immediately before admission. In only eight cases had there been no input from primary care. Accounts of protracted primary care contact generally demonstrated complexity, often related to comorbidity, patient-mediated factors or reassurance provided by negative investigations. Learning points identified by practices centred on the themes of presentation and diagnosis, consultation and safety-netting, communication and system issues, patient factors and referral guidelines.

Conclusions: There is extensive primary care input into patients whose diagnosis results from EP, and for the most part potential 'delay' in referral can be reasonably explained by the complexity of the presentation or by coexisting patient factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, Nur U, Tracey E, Coory M, Hatcher J, McGahan CE, Turner D, Marrett L, Gjerstorff ML, Johannesen TB, Adolfsson J, Lambe M, Lawrence G, Meechan D, Morris EJ, Middleton R, Steward J, Richards MA. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet. 2011;377:127–138. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Health . The NHS Cancer Plan: a Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. HMSO: London, UK; 2000.
    1. Hodges D, Rubin G, Crosland A.2010. The use of Lean methods for service improvement in the early diagnosis of lung cancer, a realistic evaluation. Evaluation, Research and Development Unit: Durham University. Available at http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/school.health/erdu/FinalReportUseofLeanMe... (accessed 19 October 2014).
    1. McKay J, Bradley N, Lough M, Bowie P. A review of significant events analysed in general practice: implications for the quality and safety of patient care. BMC Fam Pract. 2009;10:61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McPhail S, Elliss-Brookes L, Shelton J, Ives A, Greenslade M, Vernon S, Morris EJA, Richards M. Emergency presentation of cancer and short-term mortality. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2027–2034. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types