Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 24;6(2):e02367.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.02367-14.

A new player at the flagellar motor: FliL controls both motor output and bias

Affiliations

A new player at the flagellar motor: FliL controls both motor output and bias

Jonathan D Partridge et al. mBio. .

Abstract

The bacterial flagellum is driven by a bidirectional rotary motor, which propels bacteria to swim through liquids or swarm over surfaces. While the functions of the major structural and regulatory components of the flagellum are known, the function of the well-conserved FliL protein is not. In Salmonella and Escherichia coli, the absence of FliL leads to a small defect in swimming but complete elimination of swarming. Here, we tracked single motors of these bacteria and found that absence of FliL decreases their speed as well as switching frequency. We demonstrate that FliL interacts strongly with itself, with the MS ring protein FliF, and with the stator proteins MotA and MotB and weakly with the rotor switch protein FliG. These and other experiments show that FliL increases motor output either by recruiting or stabilizing the stators or by increasing their efficiency and contributes additionally to torque generation at higher motor loads. The increased torque enabled by FliL explains why this protein is essential for swarming on an agar surface expected to offer increased resistance to bacterial movement.

Importance: FliL is a well-conserved bacterial flagellar protein whose absence leads to a variety of motility defects, ranging from moderate to complete inhibition of swimming in some bacterial species, inhibition of swarming in others, structural defects that break the flagellar rod during swarming in E. coli and Salmonella, and failure to eject the flagellar filament during the developmental transition of a swimmer to a stalk cell in Caulobacter crescentus. Despite these many phenotypes, a specific function for FliL has remained elusive. Here, we established a central role for FliL at the Salmonella and E. coli motors, where it interacts with both rotor and stator proteins, increases motor output, and contributes to the normal rotational bias of the motor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Behavior of single motors of Salmonella (A) and E. coli (B) over a 60-s time frame. Rotation of motors of Salmonella (JP1107) and E. coli (MT02) was monitored by recording the motion of 0.75 µm polystyrene beads attached to sheared “sticky” filaments. Rotation speeds are expressed in Hz. The positive and negative values represent CW and CCW rotations, respectively. Switching (reversal in motor direction) occurs when the trace crosses zero. The profiles are representative of at least 20 individual motors.
FIG  2
FIG  2
Interaction of Salmonella FliL with itself and with rotor-stator components and localization of GFP-FliL at the BB in Salmonella. (A) Two-hybrid assays using the BACTH system, employing full-length proteins expressed from pKT25 or pUT18C, are described in Materials and Methods. Positive controls utilized proteins that dimerize via leucine zipper motifs (ZIP). Negative controls were the empty vectors (None). The strength of interactions between the indicated pairs of proteins was measured quantitatively by the Miller assay (left) as well as visually by colony color (right). The Miller values are averages from six independent biological repeats, each with three technical repeats. (B) Pulldown assays. GST fusions of indicated full-length proteins were coexpressed with either FliL-FLAG (upper set) or FliFpEc-HA (bottom set) in a ΔflhDC mutant strain (RP3098; i.e., no other flagellar proteins were present). Negative controls expressed GST alone. The detergent CHAPS was used to solubilize membrane proteins. Cell lysates were passed over Sepharose beads to trap the GST fusion protein and eluted with glutathione to determine if either FliL-FLAG or FliFpEc-HA was pulled down using appropriate antibodies to detect the epitope-tagged proteins. Lysate controls (L) show protein levels in samples prior to pulldown (P). FliFpEc, periplasmic domain of FliF from E. coli. Assays are representative of at least three independent experiments. All fusion proteins were expressed from plasmids (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). (C) All strains (a to f) expressed GFP-FliL from pJP02 and carried deletions in the indicated genes. The strains are all derived from UA74. The absence of fluorescent puncta when stators are present (a) is likely because the bulky GFP moiety prevents FliL incorporation into the assembled stators. When either MotA alone (b; JP350) or both MotA/MotB (d; JP393) were absent, a punctate pattern indicative of GFP-FliL localization at the BB was observed. The absence of puncta in the ΔmotB strain (c; JP452) is consistent with the report that MotA can localize to the BB by itself (64), where it would be expected to prevent GFP-FliL incorporation. Punctate patterns were eliminated in a ΔflhDC mutant (UA22) (no flagellar machinery present) (e) but restored if only FliF was expressed in this strain (pFliF; FliF oligomerizes into the MS ring by itself [1, 33]), suggesting that FliL can localize to the MS ring in the absence of other flagellar machinery (f).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Influence of FliL on stator protein interaction and stator recovery at the BB in Salmonella. (A) Stator protein interaction in the absence (black bars) and presence (grey bars) of FliL was measured by two-hybrid assays as described for Fig. 2A. The vector control is empty pBAD33. MotA and MotB vectors were as in Fig. 2A. FliL was expressed from pJP134. (B) Kinetics of FRAP. Recovery of MotAEc-YFP (provided on plasmid pHL3) fluorescence after bleaching of puncta (inset) was monitored in the indicated Salmonella genetic backgrounds as described in Materials and Methods. Fluorescence intensity prior to bleaching is given a relative value of 1. Bleaching was controlled so as not to reduce the signal to 0, because recovery was poor otherwise. The data are a mean of 3 separate experiments and at least 9 individual puncta. (C) Western blots to monitor the recovery of functional MotA-His from isolated BBs in the indicated Salmonella strains under swimming or swarming conditions, with and without FliL, as well as with FliL overexpression (pFliL; pJP133) conditions as described in the supplemental material (representative blots are shown in Fig. S4). Data are the averages from 5 separate experiments. Error bars represent standard deviations from the mean.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Mutations in the MotB plug suppress the motility defect of Salmonella fliL mutants but not their rod breakage phenotype. (A) The MotB plug region in Salmonella, E. coli, and Rhodobacter was aligned using T-Coffee (65). This region follows the transmembrane (TM) domain and is typically flanked by proline residues (*). The residues mutated in this study are indicated by numbers above the Salmonella sequence. L56 and A60 are equivalent to positions F63 and A67 in R. sphaeroides, respectively, substitutions at which suppressed the fliL motility defect (23), while substitutions at I59 resulted in growth defects in E. coli (13). (B and C) Two MotB plug mutations (L56A and A60E) expressed in a ΔfliL background (last two columns) suppress both swimming and swarming motility compared to the ΔfliL mutant alone (second column). The wild-type parent is shown in the first column. All strains have motB deleted on the chromosome (QW180) and are complemented by MotB from plasmid pJP74 or respective mutants from pJP114 (L56A) or pJP88 (A60E). (D) Cells picked from the edge of a swarm colony and stained with anti-flagellin (FljB) antibodies. The flagella are attached in the presence of FliL but detached in its absence, irrespective of the MotB plug mutation.
FIG  5
FIG  5
Influence of FliL on single-motor behavior of MotB plug mutations in Salmonella. All strains are ΔmotB (QW180) and are complemented with either wild-type MotB (pJP74) or its indicated plug mutant derivatives (pJP114 and pJP88). Motor function was monitored by the bead assay as described for Fig. 1.
FIG 6
FIG 6
Effect of viscosity on the behavior of fliL mutant motors of E. coli. (A) Motor speeds of wild-type E. coli (MT02) and its ΔfliL derivative (JP1297) monitored with increasing Ficoll concentrations as described for Fig. 1. (B) Torque versus speed plots of the data in panel A, derived as described in Materials and Methods. (C) Switching frequency of the motor, derived from data in panel A. At least 10 individual motors were monitored at each Ficoll concentration.
FIG  7
FIG  7
Model showing the location and function of FliL at the motor. FliL is positioned to interact closely with both the stators and the MS ring (side view of the flagellum and cross view of the MS ring and stators). This arrangement stabilizes the stators and enhances proton flow/efficiency, delivering a higher torque, as depicted on the left side of the flagellum image. Interaction of FliL with FliG as well as MotA (which interacts with FliG) contributes to the switching behavior of the motor. The lower rotation speed in the absence of FliL is depicted on the right side of the flagellum image. Strong FliL-FliL interactions suggest that FliL is at least a dimer, as indicated in the cross view. Association of FliL with the MS ring protein FliF may reinforce the rod, helping it to withstand high external load during swarming. IM, inner membrane; PG, peptidoglycan layer; OM, outer membrane.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Macnab RM. 2003. How bacteria assemble flagella. Annu Rev Microbiol 57:77–100. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090832. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg HC. 2003. The rotary motor of bacterial flagella. Annu Rev Biochem 72:19–54. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161737. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kojima S, Blair DF. 2004. The bacterial flagellar motor: structure and function of a complex molecular machine. Int Rev Cytol 233:93–134. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(04)33003-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hazelbauer GL, Falke JJ, Parkinson JS. 2008. Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays. Trends Biochem Sci 33:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2007.09.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minamino T, Imada K, Namba K. 2008. Molecular motors of the bacterial flagella. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18:693–701. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.09.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources