External quality assessment unravels interlaboratory differences in quality of RAS testing for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer
- PMID: 25657200
- PMCID: PMC4350801
- DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0382
External quality assessment unravels interlaboratory differences in quality of RAS testing for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer
Abstract
Background: Regulations for the selection of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer for anti-EGFR treatment changed at the end of 2013. The set of mutations to be tested extended from KRAS codons 12 and 13 to KRAS and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4. A European external quality assessment scheme monitored the performance of laboratories and evaluated the implementation of the new regulations.
Materials and methods: The 131 participating laboratories received 10 samples of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material, including RAS (exon 2, 3, 4) and BRAF mutations. Mock clinical data were provided for three cases. Using their routine methods, laboratories determined the genotypes and submitted three written reports. Assessors scored the results according to predefined evaluation criteria.
Results: Half of the participants (49.3%) had completely implemented the new test requirements (codons 12, 13, 59, 61, 117, and 146 of KRAS and NRAS), and 96 laboratories (73.3%) made no genotype mistakes. Correct nomenclature, according to the Human Genome Variation Society, was used by 82 laboratories (62.6%).
Conclusion: Although regulations were effective for several months, many laboratories were not ready for full RAS testing in the context of anti-EGFR therapy. Nevertheless, in each participating country, there are laboratories that provide complete and correct testing. External quality assessments can be used to monitor implementation of new test regulations and to stimulate the laboratories to improve their testing procedures. Because the results of this program are available on the website of the European Society of Pathology, patients and clinicians can refer test samples to a reliable laboratory.
Keywords: Biological markers; Colorectal neoplasms; Patient safety; Quality assurance.
©AlphaMed Press.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Italian external quality assessment for RAS testing in colorectal carcinoma identifies methods-related inter-laboratory differences.J Transl Med. 2015 Sep 3;13:287. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0655-1. J Transl Med. 2015. PMID: 26335936 Free PMC article.
-
External quality assessment for KRAS testing is needed: setup of a European program and report of the first joined regional quality assessment rounds.Oncologist. 2011;16(4):467-78. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0429. Epub 2011 Mar 26. Oncologist. 2011. PMID: 21441573 Free PMC article.
-
Higher quality of molecular testing, an unfulfilled priority: Results from external quality assessment for KRAS mutation testing in colorectal cancer.J Mol Diagn. 2014 May;16(3):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Mar 14. J Mol Diagn. 2014. PMID: 24631467
-
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can testing of tumor tissue for mutations in EGFR pathway downstream effector genes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer improve health outcomes by guiding decisions regarding anti-EGFR therapy?Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):517-27. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.184. Epub 2013 Feb 21. Genet Med. 2013. PMID: 23429431
-
The predictive value of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):852-64. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.895036. Epub 2014 Mar 25. Acta Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24666267 Review.
Cited by
-
RAS testing for colorectal cancer patients is reliable in European laboratories that pass external quality assessment.Virchows Arch. 2018 May;472(5):717-725. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2291-z. Epub 2018 Jan 15. Virchows Arch. 2018. PMID: 29333594
-
Incorporating BEAMing technology as a liquid biopsy into clinical practice for the management of colorectal cancer patients: an expert taskforce review.Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;28(12):2943-2949. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx501. Ann Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28945877 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers.Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Oct 18;10(10):837. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100837. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33080995 Free PMC article.
-
Blood-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer patients: concordance of results from circulating tumor DNA and tissue-based RAS testing.Mol Oncol. 2017 Feb;11(2):208-219. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12023. Epub 2017 Jan 20. Mol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28106345 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
RAS Mutations Beyond KRAS Exon 2: A Review and Discussion of Clinical Trial Data.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):33. doi: 10.1007/s11864-015-0350-8. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26050230 Review.
References
-
- Heinemann V, Douillard JY, Ducreux M, et al. Targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer -- an example of personalised medicine in action. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39:592–601. - PubMed
-
- Erbitux (cetuximab) [European Public Assessment Report]. Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Summary_for_.... Accessed September 25, 2014.
-
- Vectibix (panitumumab) [European Public Assessment Report]. Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Summary_for_.... Accessed September 25, 2014.
-
- Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S, et al. Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1023–1034. - PubMed
-
- Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT, et al. Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: The OPUS study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1535–1546. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous