Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06)
- PMID: 25605741
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv011
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06)
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is a standard option for first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We assessed whether no continuation is non-inferior to continuation of bevacizumab after completing first-line chemotherapy.
Patients and methods: In an open-label, phase III multicentre trial, patients with mCRC without disease progression after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomly assigned to continuing bevacizumab at a standard dose or no treatment. CT scans were done every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A non-inferiority limit for hazard ratio (HR) of 0.727 was chosen to detect a difference in TTP of 6 weeks or less, with a one-sided significance level of 10% and a statistical power of 85%.
Results: The intention-to-treat population comprised 262 patients: median follow-up was 36.7 months. The median TTP was 4.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-5.4] months for bevacizumab continuation versus 2.9 (95% CI 2.8-3.8) months for no continuation; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.96). Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. The median overall survival was 25.4 months for bevacizumab continuation versus 23.8 months (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.63-1.1; P = 0.2) for no continuation. Severe adverse events were uncommon in the bevacizumab continuation arm. Costs for bevacizumab continuation were estimated to be ∼30,000 USD per patient.
Conclusions: Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated for treatment holidays versus continuing bevacizumab monotheray, after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Based on no impact on overall survival and increased treatment costs, bevacizumab as a single agent is of no meaningful therapeutic value. More efficient treatment approaches are needed to maintain control of stabilized disease following induction therapy.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00544700.
Keywords: bevacizumab; maintenance therapy; metastatic colorectal cancer.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and reintroduction after progression versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRIBE2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):497-507. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30862-9. Epub 2020 Mar 9. Lancet Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32164906 Clinical Trial.
-
Maintenance strategies after first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (AIO 0207): a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1355-69. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00042-X. Epub 2015 Sep 8. Lancet Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26361971 Clinical Trial.
-
Modified XELIRI (capecitabine plus irinotecan) versus FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan), both either with or without bevacizumab, as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (AXEPT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):660-671. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30140-2. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29555258 Clinical Trial.
-
Second-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 27;1(1):CD006875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006875.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28128439 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment with bevacizumab and FOLFOXIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: presentation of two novel trials (CHARTA and PERIMAX) and review of the literature.BMC Cancer. 2012 Aug 16;12:356. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-356. BMC Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22897915 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Panitumumab-based maintenance after oxaliplatin discontinuation in metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis of two randomised trials.Int J Cancer. 2019 Jul 15;145(2):576-585. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32110. Epub 2019 Jan 24. Int J Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30614531 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based appraisal of the upfront treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer patients.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 14;19(46):8474-88. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8474. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24379565 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Drug Holidays and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;13(14):3504. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143504. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34298718 Free PMC article.
-
Protein array profiling of circulating angiogenesis-related factors during bevacizumab containing treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.PLoS One. 2018 Dec 28;13(12):e0209838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209838. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30592740 Free PMC article.
-
Successful treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with apatinib: report of two cases and literature review.Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Feb 19;11:883-890. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S148412. eCollection 2018. Onco Targets Ther. 2018. PMID: 29497319 Free PMC article.