Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;23(4):1169-96.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2581-9. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy

Affiliations
Review

Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy

Jennifer A H Bell et al. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Oncology clinical trials are necessary for the improvement of patient care as they have the ability to confirm the efficacy and safety of novel cancer treatments and in so doing, contribute to a solid evidence base on which practitioners and patients can make informed treatment decisions. However, only 3-5 % of adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials. Lack of participation compromises the success of clinical trials and squanders an opportunity for improving patient outcomes. This literature review summarizes the factors and contexts that influence cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation.

Methods: An integrative review was undertaken within PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for articles written between 1995 and 2012 and archived under relevant keywords. Articles selected were data-based, written in English, and limited to adult cancer patients.

Results: In the 51 articles reviewed, three main types of factors were identified that influence cancer patients' decision making about participation in clinical trials: personal, social, and system factors. Subthemes included patients' trust in their physician and the research process, undue influence within the patient-physician relationship, and systemic social inequalities. How these factors interact and influence patients' decision-making process and relational autonomy, however, is insufficiently understood.

Conclusions: Future research is needed to further elucidate the sociopolitical barriers and facilitators of clinical trial participation and to enhance ethical practice within clinical trial enrolment. This research will inform targeted education and support interventions to foster patients' relational autonomy in the decision-making process and potentially improve clinical trial participation rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. 2003 Mar 15;97(6):1499-506 - PubMed
    1. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar;7(1):27-33 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):128-35 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2268-75 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 15;20(8):2109-17 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources