Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Dec 11:14:313.
doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0313-4.

Comparison of nested, multiplex, qPCR; FISH; SeptiFast and blood culture methods in detection and identification of bacteria and fungi in blood of patients with sepsis

Comparative Study

Comparison of nested, multiplex, qPCR; FISH; SeptiFast and blood culture methods in detection and identification of bacteria and fungi in blood of patients with sepsis

Tomasz Gosiewski et al. BMC Microbiol. .

Abstract

Background: Microbiological diagnosis of sepsis relies primarily on blood culture data. This study compares four diagnostic methods, i.e. those developed by us: nested, multiplex, qPCR (qPCR) and FISH with commercial methods: SeptiFast (Roche) (SF) and BacT/ALERT® 3D blood culture system (bioMérieux). Blood samples were derived from adult patients with clinical symptoms of sepsis, according to SIRS criteria, hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit.

Results: Using qPCR, FISH, SF, and culture, microbial presence was found in 71.8%, 29.6%, 25.3%, and 36.6% of samples, respectively. It was demonstrated that qPCR was significantly more likely to detect microorganisms than the remaining methods; qPCR confirmed the results obtained with the SF kit in all cases wherein bacteria were detected with simultaneous confirmation of Gram-typing. All data collected through the FISH method were corroborated by qPCR.

Conclusions: The qPCR and FISH methods described in this study may constitute alternatives to blood culture and to the few existing commercial molecular assays since they enable the detection of the majority of microbial species, and the qPCR method allows their identification in a higher number of samples than the SF test. FISH made it possible to show the presence of microbes in a blood sample even before its culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Picture from a fluorescence microscope, obtained with the use of FISH: (A) visible K. pneumoniae bacteria (sample no. 67); (B) visible Streptococcus spp. bacteria (sample no. 35); (C) visible E. cloacae bacteria (sample no. 13). Magnification 1000 x.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jamal W, Tamaray G, Pazhoor A, Rotimi VO. Comparative evaluation of BacT/ALERT 3D and BACTEC systems for the recovery of pathogens causing bloodstream infections. Med Princ Pract. 2006;15:223–227. doi: 10.1159/000092186. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loonen AJM, Wolffs PFG, Bruggeman CA, van den Brule AJC. Developments for improved diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:1687–1702. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2153-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burdino E, Ruggiero T, Allice T, Milia MG, Gregori G, Milano R, Cerutti F, De Rosa FG, Manno E, Caramello P, Di Perri G, Ghisetti V. Combination of conventional blood cultures and the SeptiFast molecular test in patients with suspected sepsis for the identification of bloodstream pathogens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79:287–292. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.03.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schreiber J, Nierhaus A, Braune SA, de Heer G, Kluge S. Comparison of three different commercial PCR assays for the detection of pathogens in critically ill sepsis patients. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2013;108:311–318. doi: 10.1007/s00063-013-0227-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leitner E, Kessler HH. Broad-range PCR for the identification of bacterial and fungal pathogens from blood: a sequencing approach. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1237:129–138. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1776-1_13. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms