Switch to natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
- PMID: 25546031
- DOI: 10.1002/ana.24339
Switch to natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Objective: In patients suffering multiple sclerosis activity despite treatment with interferon β or glatiramer acetate, clinicians often switch therapy to either natalizumab or fingolimod. However, no studies have directly compared the outcomes of switching to either of these agents.
Methods: Using MSBase, a large international, observational, prospectively acquired cohort study, we identified patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis experiencing relapses or disability progression within the 6 months immediately preceding switch to either natalizumab or fingolimod. Quasi-randomization with propensity score-based matching was used to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapse and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses.
Results: Of the 792 included patients, 578 patients were matched (natalizumab, n = 407; fingolimod, n = 171). Mean on-study follow-up was 12 months. The annualized relapse rates decreased from 1.5 to 0.2 on natalizumab and from 1.3 to 0.4 on fingolimod, with 50% relative postswitch difference in relapse hazard (p = 0.002). A 2.8 times higher rate of sustained disability regression was observed after the switch to natalizumab in comparison to fingolimod (p < 0.001). No difference in the rate of sustained disability progression events was observed between the groups. The change in overall disability burden (quantified as area under the disability-time curve) differed between natalizumab and fingolimod (-0.12 vs 0.04 per year, respectively, p < 0.001).
Interpretation: This study suggests that in active multiple sclerosis during treatment with injectable disease-modifying therapies, switching to natalizumab is more effective than switching to fingolimod in reducing relapse rate and short-term disability burden.
© 2014 American Neurological Association.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of switch to fingolimod or interferon beta/glatiramer acetate in active multiple sclerosis.JAMA Neurol. 2015 Apr;72(4):405-13. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4147. JAMA Neurol. 2015. PMID: 25665031
-
Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis.Brain. 2015 Nov;138(Pt 11):3275-86. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv260. Epub 2015 Sep 11. Brain. 2015. PMID: 26362907
-
Are natalizumab and fingolimod analogous second-line options for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis? A clinical practice observational study.Eur Neurol. 2014;72(3-4):173-80. doi: 10.1159/000361044. Epub 2014 Sep 6. Eur Neurol. 2014. PMID: 25226868
-
Oral fingolimod for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;65(8):887-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02721.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16. Int J Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 21679286 Review.
-
Management of fingolimod in clinical practice.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;115 Suppl 1:S60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.09.023. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013. PMID: 24321158 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of multiple sclerosis patients in central European countries: current needs and potential solutions.Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Feb 22;11:1756286418759189. doi: 10.1177/1756286418759189. eCollection 2018. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018. PMID: 29511382 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Annualized hospitalization rate with natalizumab vs fingolimod in second-line treatment for RRMS in the public healthcare system in Brazil: A claim database approach.PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229768. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32119696 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Apr;16(4):38. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0639-4. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016. PMID: 26944956 Review.
-
Natalizumab versus fingolimod for patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from REVEAL, a prospective, randomised head-to-head study.BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):e038861. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038861. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33082194 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Study design of PANGAEA 2.0, a non-interventional study on RRMS patients to be switched to fingolimod.BMC Neurol. 2016 Aug 8;16:129. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0648-6. BMC Neurol. 2016. PMID: 27502119 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources